TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant ☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  o

Check the appropriate box:

 o

Preliminary Proxy Statement
 o

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement
 o

Definitive Additional Materials
 o

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
L Brands, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

No fee required.
o
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
 
(1)
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
 
(2)
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
 
(3)
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
 
(4)
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
 
(5)
Total fee paid:
 
 
o
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
o
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
 
(1)
Amount Previously Paid:
 
(2)
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
 
 
 
 
(3)
Filing Party:
 
 
 
 
(4)
Date Filed:
 
 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Notice of
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
and Proxy Statement
May 16, 201920, 2021



TABLE OF CONTENTS

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on May 20, 2021: The proxy statement and annual report to stockholders are available at www.proxyvote.com.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

April 23, 2019

8, 2021

DEAR STOCKHOLDER:

You are cordially invited to attend our 20192021 annual meeting of stockholders to be held at 8:10:30 a.m., Eastern Time, on May 16, 2019,20, 2021, at our offices located at Three Limited Parkway, Columbus, Ohio 43230. Our Investor Relations telephone number is (614) 415-7585 should you require assistance in finding the location of the meeting. The formal Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and proxy statement are attached. If you plan to attend, please bring the Admittance Slip located at the back of this booklet and a picture I.D., and review the attendance information provided. IWe hope that you will be able to attend and participate in the meeting, at which time I will have the opportunity to review the business and operations of our company.

meeting.

The matters to be acted upon by our stockholders are discussed in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. It is important that your shares be represented and voted at the meeting. Accordingly, after reading the attached proxy statement, would youplease kindly sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card or vote by telephone or via the Internet as described on the enclosed proxy card. Your vote is important regardless of the number of shares you own.

Sincerely yours,
 

/s/ Sarah E. Nash
/s/ Andrew M. Meslow
 
Leslie H. Wexner
Sarah E. Nash
ChairmanAndrew M. Meslow
Chair of the Board
Chief Executive Officer
* We are continuing to monitor the public health and travel concerns relating to COVID-19 and the related recommendations and protocols issued by federal, state and local governments. In the event that it is not possible or advisable to hold our annual meeting at the time, date and place as originally planned, we will announce alternative arrangements for the meeting as promptly as practicable, which may include holding the meeting solely by means of remote communication or adjourning or postponing the meeting. Any such change, including details on how to participate in a remote meeting, would be announced in advance via press release, a copy of which would be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as additional proxy solicitation materials and posted on our website at http://www.lb.com. Please check this website in advance of the meeting date if you are planning to attend in person.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS



May 16, 2019

20, 2021

April 23, 2019

8, 2021

TO THE STOCKHOLDERS OF L BRANDS, INC.:

We are pleased to invite you to attend our 20192021 annual meeting of stockholders to:

to be held at 10:30 a.m., Eastern Time, on May 20, 2021, at our offices located at Three Limited Parkway, Columbus, Ohio 43230. At the 2021 annual meeting of stockholders, you will vote on the following items of business:
Elect the fourten nominees proposed by the Board of Directors as directors to serve for a three-year term.
directors.
Ratify the appointment of our independent registered public accountants.
Hold an advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation.
Vote on the stockholder proposal to remove supermajority voting requirements,regarding stockholder action by written consent, if properly presented at the meeting.
Transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

Stockholders of record at the close of business on March 22, 201926, 2021 may vote at the meeting. If you plan to attend, please bring the Admittance Slip located at the back of this booklet and a picture I.D., and review the attendance information provided. Your vote is important. Stockholders of record can give proxies by calling a toll-free telephone number, by using the Internet or by mailing their signed proxy cards. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please vote by telephone or via the Internet or sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card in the envelope provided. Instructions are included on your proxy card. You may change your vote by submitting a later dated proxy (including a proxy via telephone or the Internet) or by attending the meeting and voting in person.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on May 16, 2019: The proxy statement and annual report to stockholders are available at www.proxyvote.com. We encourage you to review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials before voting.

If you have any questions or require any assistance with voting your shares, please contact our proxy solicitor:


Innisfree M&A Incorporated
501 Madison Avenue, 20th floor
New York, New York 10022
Shareholders may call toll free: (888) 750-5834
Banks and Brokers may call collect: (212) 750-5833

 
By Order of the Board of Directors,
 

 
Leslie H. Wexner/s/ Sarah E. Nash
 
Chairman
Sarah E. Nash
Chair of the Board


TABLE OF CONTENTS


TABLE OF CONTENTS

INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

The Board of Directors (the “Board”) is soliciting your proxy to vote at our 20192021 annual meeting of stockholders (or at any adjournment of the meeting). This proxy statement summarizes the information you need to know to vote at the meeting. In this proxy statement, “we,” “our,” “L Brands” and the “Company” refer to L Brands, Inc.

We began mailing a printed copy of this proxy statement and the enclosed proxy card, or the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) on or about April 26, 20199, 2021 to all stockholders entitled to vote. The Company’s 20182020 Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “2020 10-K”), which includes our financial statements, is being sent with this proxy statement and is also available in paper copy by request or in electronic form.

Date, Time and Place of Meeting

Date:
May 16, 201920, 2021
Time:
Time:8:10:30 a.m., Eastern Time
Place:
Three Limited Parkway, Columbus, Ohio 43230

Attending the Meeting

Stockholders who plan to attend the meeting in person must bring photo identification and the Admittance Slip located at the back of this booklet.
Although we are hosting an in-person annual meeting, due to the public health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and to support the health and well-being of our stockholders, associates and communities, attendees will be expected to comply with important health and safety protocols as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, including: wearing an appropriate face covering at all times while on the meeting premises, hand washing and/or applying hand sanitizer upon arrival and practicing social distancing by maintaining at least a six-feet distance from other attendees.
You should not attend if you feel unwell or if you have been exposed to COVID-19. Any person in attendance who exhibits cold or flu-like symptoms or who has been exposed to COVID-19 may be asked to leave the premises for the protection of the other attendees. We reserve the right to take any additional precautionary measures deemed appropriate in relation to the meeting and access to meeting premises, and may ask attendees to leave the meeting if they are not following our procedures.
Because of necessary security precautions, bags, purses and briefcases may be subject to inspection. To speed the admissions process, stockholders are encouraged to bring only essential items. Cameras, camcorders or videotaping equipment are not allowed.

We are continuing to monitor the public health and travel concerns relating to COVID-19 and the related recommendations and protocols issued by federal, state and local governments. In the event that it is not possible or advisable to hold our annual meeting at the time, date and place as originally planned, we will announce alternative arrangements for the meeting as promptly as practicable, which may include holding the meeting solely by means of remote communication or adjourning or postponing the meeting. Any such change, including details on how to participate in a remote meeting, would be announced in advance via press release, a copy of which would be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) as additional proxy solicitation materials and posted on our website at http://www.lb.com. Please check this website in advance of the meeting date if you are planning to attend in person.
Shares Entitled to Vote

Stockholders entitled to vote are those who owned Company common stock (which we refer to throughout this proxy statement as “Common Stock”) at the close of business on the record date, March 22, 2019.26, 2021. As of the record date, there were 275,213,368278,897,853 shares of Common Stock outstanding. Each share of Common Stock that you own entitles you to one vote.

Voting Your Shares

Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, we urge you to vote. Stockholders of record can give proxies by calling a toll-free telephone number, by using the Internet or by mailing their signed proxy cards.
1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The telephone and Internet voting procedures are designed to authenticate stockholders’ identities, to allow stockholders to give their voting instructions and to confirm that stockholders’ instructions have been recorded properly. If you are voting by mail, please complete, sign and date the enclosed proxy card and return it promptly in the envelope provided. If you are voting by telephone or via the Internet, please use the telephone or Internet voting procedures set forth on the enclosed proxy card. Returning the proxy card or voting via telephone or the Internet will not affect your right to attend the meeting and vote.

The enclosed proxy card indicates the number of shares that you own.

Voting instructions are included on your proxy card. If you properly fill in your proxy card and send it to us or vote via telephone or the Internet in time to vote, one of the individuals named on your proxy card (your “proxy”) will vote your shares as you have directed. If you sign the proxy card or vote via telephone or the Internet but do not make specific choices, your proxy will follow the Board’s recommendations and vote your shares in the following manner:

“FOR” the election of the Board’s fourten nominees for director (as described on page 45);
“FOR” the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accountants (as described on page 1316);
“FOR” on the advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation (as described on pagespage 14 and 1517); and
FOR” onAGAINST” the stockholder proposal regarding stockholder action by written consent (as described on page 1619).

1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

If any other matter is properly presented at the meeting, your proxy will vote in accordance with his or her best judgment. At the time this proxy statement went to press, we knew of no other matters to be acted on at the meeting. See “—Vote Necessary to Approve Proposals” for a discussion of the votes required to approve these items.

Certain stockholders received a Notice containing instructions on how to access this proxy statement and our 2020 10-K via the Internet. Those stockholders should refer to the Notice for instructions on how to vote.
Revoking Your Proxy

You may revoke your proxy by:

submitting a later dated proxy (including a proxy via telephone or the Internet);
notifying our Secretary at our principal executive offices at Three Limited Parkway, Columbus, Ohio 43230, in writing before the meeting that you have revoked your proxy; or
voting in person at the meeting.

Voting in Person

If you plan to vote in person, a ballot will be available when you arrive. However, if your shares are held in the name of your broker, bank or other nominee, you must bring an account statement or letter from the nominee indicating that you were the beneficial owner of the shares at the close of business on March 22, 2019,26, 2021, the record date for voting, as well as a proxy, executed in your favor, from the nominee.

Appointing Your Own Proxy

If you want to give your proxy to someone other than the individuals named as proxies on the proxy card, you may cross out the names of those individuals and insert the name of the individual you are authorizing to vote. Either you or that authorized individual must present the proxy card at the meeting.

Quorum Requirement

A quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. The presence in person or by proxy at the meeting of holders of shares representing at least one-third of the votes of the Common Stock entitled to vote constitutes a quorum. Abstentions and “broker non-votes” are counted as present for establishing a quorum. A broker non-vote occurs on an item when a broker is not permitted to vote on that item absent instruction from the beneficial owner of the shares and no instruction is given.
2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Vote Necessary to Approve Proposals

Pursuant to the Company’s Bylaws, each director will be elected by a majority of the votes cast with respect to such director. A majority of the votes cast means that the number of votes “for” a director’s election must exceed 50% of the votes cast with respect to that director’s election. Any “against” votes will count as a vote cast, but “abstentions” and broker non-votes will not count as a vote cast with respect to that director’s election. Under Delaware law, if the director is not elected at the annual meeting, the director will continue to serve on the Board as a “holdover director.” As required by the Company’s Bylaws, each director has submitted an irrevocable letter of resignation as director that becomes effective if he or she does not receive a majority of votes cast in an election and the Board accepts the resignation. If a director is not elected, the Nominating & Governance Committee will consider the director’s resignation and recommend to the Board whether to accept or reject the resignation.
The ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accountants requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes present in person or by proxy and voting thereon.
The advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes present in person or by proxy and voting thereon. While this vote is required by law, it will neither be binding on the Company or the Board, nor will it create or imply any change in the fiduciary or other duties of, or impose any additional fiduciary or other duties on, the Company or the Board. However, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee (the “HCC Committee”) will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation decisions.
The stockholder proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes present in person or byin proxy and voting thereon.

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Impact of Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes

You may “abstain” from voting for any nominee in the election of directors and on the other proposals. Abstentions with respect to the election of directors and on the other proposals will be excluded entirely from the vote and will have no effect.

In addition, under New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules, if your broker holds your shares in its name, your broker is permitted to vote your shares on the proposal to ratify Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accountants, even if it did not receive voting instructions from you. Your broker may not vote your shares on any of the other matters without specific instruction. A “broker non-vote” occurs when a broker submits a proxy but refrains from voting. Shares represented by broker non-votes are counted as present or represented for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum but are not counted as otherwise present or represented.
3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Obtaining Additional Copies of the Proxy Materials

We have adopted a procedure called “householding.” Under this procedure, stockholders who share the same last name and reside at the same mailing address will receive one Notice or one set of proxy materials (if they have elected to receive hard copies of the proxy materials), unless one of the stockholders at that address has notified us that they wish to receive individual copies. Stockholders who participate in householding continue to receive separate control numbers for voting. Householding does not in any way affect dividend check mailings.

If you hold Common Stock and currently are subject to householding, but prefer to receive separate copies of proxy materials and other stockholder communications from the Company, or if you are sharing an address with another stockholder and would like to consent to householding, you may revoke or grant your consent to householding as appropriate at any time by calling toll-free at 1-866-540-7095 or notifying our Secretary at our principal executive offices at Three Limited Parkway, Columbus, Ohio 43230.

A number of brokerages and other institutional holders of record have implemented householding. If you hold your shares beneficially in street name, please contact your broker or other intermediary holder of record to request information about householding.

3

4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Board has nominated fourten directors for election at the annual meeting. If you elect the fourten nominees they will hold office for a three-yearone-year term expiring at the 2022 annual meeting or until their successors have been elected.

Director Succession
The Board believes in the necessity of ongoing Board refreshment, and rigorous self-evaluation, diversity and succession planning. Over the past year, we have demonstrated this commitment. We listened to and engagedregularly engage with our shareholdersstockholders and other stakeholders on Board refreshment. We focused our efforts on recruiting strategies to identify new directors who embody the skills, experience, diversity and independence of perspective critical to oversee our Company’s strategies for delivering long-term shareholder value. Working with a search firm, the Nominating & Governance Committee recommended Sarah E. Nash and Anne Sheehan as potential director candidates to the Board, and the Board accepted such recommendation and nominated Ms. Nash and Ms. Sheehan to stand for election at the annual meeting. If all of our nominees are elected this year, we would have added fiveeight new directors since 2014, and fiveseven of whom are independent directors. If all director nominees are elected to serve as our twelvedirectors, six of our directors will be women.

women, including our Chair of the Board, four of whom are ethnically diverse. Information regarding ethnic and gender diversity is based on characteristics self-identified by director nominees.

The Board has in place a robust process that will allow us to continue to refresh the Board and its leadership significantly over the next several years and beyond.Board. We want a thoughtful approach to succession planning and an orderly transition, and the Board seeks to strike a balanced approach that allows the Board to benefit from the right mix of newer directors who bring fresh perspectives and seasoned directors who bring continuity and deep insight into our business and strategies. The Company believes that an effective Board consists of individuals who possess a variety of complementary skills, a range of tenures and a diversity of perspectives. We intend to refresh our Boardassess and assessimplement our Board succession plansplan with this in mind. The Nominating and& Governance Committee and the Board consider the performance, contributions, skills and experience of our Board members in the broader context of the Board’s overall composition, with a view toward constituting a Board that has the integrity, judgment, skill set, experience and other characteristics to oversee the broad set of challenges that the Company faces and evaluate management on executing the Company’s business strategy.
Corporate Governance Highlights
The Board constantly reviews evolving best practices in corporate governance and stays abreast of developments in the area of corporate governance. We have a policy of robust engagement with stockholders, with continuing outreach to and dialogue with all of our major investors on a range of issues, including corporate governance matters and environmental and social goals and initiatives. Corporate governance highlights include:
Board Oversight
Oversees the Company’s strategic plans, capital structure, assessment and management of enterprise risk, cybersecurity and data security policies and environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) matters.
Regular reviews of succession plans for the Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”) and other senior management positions.
Independent Chair of the Board.
Stockholder Rights and Accountability
Declassified the Board in 2020 – all directors are elected annually.
Removed all supermajority voting requirements in our certificate of incorporation in 2020.
Adopted proxy access, permitting up to 20 stockholders owning 3% or more of the outstanding shares of Common Stock continuously for at least three years to nominate the greater of two directors or up to 20% of our Board and include those nominees in our proxy materials.
Stockholders who own at least 25% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock may call a special meeting of stockholders.
In uncontested director elections, directors are elected by a majority of votes cast.
No “poison pill” in effect.
Annual Evaluations
Annual Board and committee assessments enhance performance.
5

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Environmental and Social Responsibility
Enterprise strategy for diversity, equity and inclusion.
Reduction of environmental impact through use of sustainably-managed materials and partnerships with environmentally responsible suppliers.
Commitment to improving the communities where we do business, including investing more than $8 million in non-profit organizations in our home office communities through the L Brands Foundation.
Director Experience, Qualifications, Attributes and Skills
We believe that our Boarddirectors, as a whole, possessespossess the right mix of qualifications, skills and experience to oversee and address the key issues facing our Company now, and the commitment to Board refreshment to ensure this moving forward.

At Our directors also reflect the Company's 2020 annual meeting,diversity of the Board will submit a proposal to stockholders to amend our certificate of incorporation to declassifyCompany’s workforce, communities it serves, its customers and other key stakeholders.

The table below summarizes the Board. If such proposal is approved by our stockholders at the Company's 2020 annual meeting, allqualifications, skills and experience of our directors will standnominees for election annually for one-year terms beginning at the Company's 2021 annual meeting.

Board.


Set forth below is additional information about the experience and qualifications of each of the nominees for director as well as each of the current members of the Board, that led the Board to conclude at the time each individual was nominated to serve on the Board, that he or she would provide valuable insight and guidance as a member of the Board.

Your proxy will vote for each of the nominees unless you specify otherwise. If any nominee is unable to serve, your proxy may vote for another nominee proposed by the Board; alternatively, the Board may elect to reduce the size of the Board. We do not know of any nominee of the Board who would be unable to serve as a director if elected.
6

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Board recommends a vote FOR the election of all of the following nominees of the Board:

If you have any questions or require any assistance with voting your shares, please contact our proxy solicitor:


Innisfree M&A Incorporated
501 Madison Avenue, 20th floor
New York, New York 10022
Shareholders may call toll free: (888) 750-5834
Banks and Brokers may call collect: (212) 750-5833

Nominees

4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Nominees and Directors

Nominees of the Board at the 2019 Annual Meeting

Patricia S. Bellinger
Director since 2017
Age 5860
Human Capital and Compensation Committee
Nominating & Governance Committee

Ms. Bellinger is the Chief of Staff and Strategic Advisor to the President of Harvard University, an institution of higher education. From 2017 to 2018, she was a Senior Fellow at the Center for Public Leadership at Harvard Kennedy School, a graduate and professional school. From 2013 to 2017, she was an Adjunct Lecturer and the Executive Director at the Center for Public Leadership at the Harvard Kennedy School and from 2010 to 2013, she was the Executive Director of Executive Education at Harvard Business School, a graduate and professional school. Prior to joining Harvard Business School, Ms. Bellinger was group vice president at British Petroleum, a global energy company, from 2000 to 2007, where she oversaw leadership development programs and established and led British Petroleum’s global diversity and inclusion transformation. Ms. Bellinger served as a director of Pattern Energy Group Inc., a power company, from 2013 until 2018 and Paris-based Sodexo S.A., from 2005 until 2018.2018 and as a trustee of uAspire. She also serves as a director of Paris-based Sonepar and as a trustee of uAspire.Safran S.A. Ms. Bellinger’s nomination is supported by her extensive executive, business and leadership experience and service on several boards of directors.

Sarah E. NashDonna A. James
Director Nomineesince 2003
Age 6563
Audit Committee
Nominating & Governance Committee

Ms. Nash is the Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of privately held Novagard Solutions, a manufacturer of silicone sealants, coatings, foam and thermal products, and has held this position since 2018. Ms. Nash spent nearly 30 years in investment banking at JPMorgan Chase & Co. (and predecessor companies), retiring as Vice Chairman, Global Investment Banking, in 2005. Ms. Nash currently serves on the board of Blackbaud, Inc., a software company providing technology solutions for the not-for-profit industry, and has done so since 2010, on the board of Knoll, Inc., a designer and manufacturer of lifestyle and workplace furnishings, textiles and fine leathers, and has done so since 2006, and on the board of privately held Irving Oil Company, and has done so since 2012. Ms. Nash previously served as a director of Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, from 2006 until 2014. Ms. Nash is a trustee of the New York-Presbyterian Hospital, a member of the National Board of the Smithsonian Institution and Chairman of the International Advisory Board of the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts. Ms. Nash’s nomination is supported by her extensive experience in capital markets, strategic transactions, corporate governance and non-profit organizations.

Anne Sheehan
Director Nominee
Age 62

Ms. Sheehan is the Chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Investor Advisory Committee. From 2008 until 2018, Ms. Sheehan served as the Director of Corporate Governance at The California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS), the largest educator-only pension fund in the world and the second largest pension fund in the United States. She previously served as the Chief Deputy Director for Policy at the California Department of Finance from 2004 to 2008 and as Executive Director at the California Building Industry Foundation from 2000 to 2004. Ms. Sheehan is a founder of the Investor Stewardship Group and serves on the Advisory Board of the Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware. Ms. Sheehan’s nomination is supported by her extensive experience as a corporate governance professional and her senior management and leadership experience addressing complex legislative, regulatory and public finance issues.

Leslie H. Wexner
Director since 1963
Age 81

Mr. Wexner has been Chief Executive Officer of the Company since he founded the Company in 1963, and Chairman of the Board for 43 years. Mr. Wexner is the husband of Abigail S. Wexner. Mr. Wexner’s nomination is supported by his effective leadership of the Company since its inception.

Directors Whose Terms Continue until the 2020 Annual Meeting

Donna A. James
Director since 2003
Age 61

In April 2006, Ms. James established Lardon & Associates LLC, a business and executive advisory services firm, where she is Managing Director. Ms. James served as the President of Nationwide Strategic Investments, a division of Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, from 2003 through March 2006. Ms. James served as Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and Nationwide

5

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Financial Services from 2000 until 2003. Ms. James is a director of Boston Scientific Corporation, a developer, manufacturer and marketer of medical devices.devices, and The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., an investment and insurance company. Ms. James served as a director of Marathon Petroleum Corp., a transportation fuels refiner, from 2011 to 2018.2018, and as an advisor to the Marathon Petroleum Corp. board of directors from 2019 to 2020. Ms. James also served as Chairman of Financial Settlement Services Agency, Inc. from 2005 through 2006, as director of CNO Financial Group, Inc., a holding company for a group of insurance companies, from 2007 to 2011, as director of Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc., a nonalcoholic beverages company, from 2005 to 2012 and as a director of Time Warner Cable Inc., a provider of video, data and voice services, from 2009 to 2016. Ms. James’s nomination wasis supported by her executive experience, financial expertise, service on several boards of directors and experience with respect to corporate diversity and related issues.

Francis A. Hondal
Director since 2021
Age 56
Ms. Hondal is President of Loyalty and Engagement at Mastercard Incorporated, a global technology company in the payments industry and has served in this position since 2018. She is also a member of Mastercard Incorporated’s management committee and leads the development of products that enable consumer experiences through loyalty, rewards and performance-based marketing services for enterprises worldwide. From 2015 to 2018, Ms. Hondal was Executive Vice President of Credit and Loyalty at Mastercard Incorporated, responsible for growing usage and preference of Mastercard branded products, and from 2011 to 2015 she was Executive Vice President of Products at Mastercard Incorporated. Ms. Hondal also spent 17 years at the American Express Company in global and regional roles within the consumer services division. Since September 2020 Ms. Hondal has served as a director of Equitable Holdings, Inc., a financial service holding company comprised of two principal franchises, Equitable and AllianceBernstein. She is also a board observer for Flybits, a Canadian contextual marketing fintech, and serves on the board of the Florida International University Foundation. Ms. Hondal’s nomination is supported by her extensive consumer marketing, finance and management experience.
7

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Danielle Lee
Director since 2021
Age 45
Ms. Lee is the Chief Fan Officer for the National Basketball Association, Inc. where she oversees brand, creative and multiplatform fan marketing globally and is charged with elevating brand perceptions, cultural connection and fan engagement. Prior to joining the NBA in 2020, Ms. Lee served for four years as Global Vice President, Partner Solutions at Spotify Technology S.A., where she was responsible for developing go-to-market strategy and growing global revenue across music, podcasts and high-impact digital experiences. Prior to Spotify, Ms. Lee served as Global Vice President, Commercial Marketing at Vevo LLC and spent seven years at AT&T Inc. and served as Vice President of Product Marketing and Innovation for AT&T AdWorks after beginning her career at Showtime Networks Inc. Ms. Lee’s nomination is supported by her extensive experience and involvement in brand building, product innovation and strategic marketing across technology, media and entertainment.
Andrew M. Meslow
Director since 2020
Age 51
Mr. Meslow is the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Prior to his appointment as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company in May 2020, Mr. Meslow was the Chief Executive Officer of Bath & Body Works, a subsidiary of the Company, from February 2020 to May 2020. From 2012 to February 2020, he was the Chief Operating Officer of Bath & Body Works. Mr. Meslow also served in other positions at the Company and its subsidiaries from 2003, when he joined the Company, to 2012. Mr. Meslow’s nomination is supported by his effective leadership of the Company as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, his established track record backed by strong operating, business development and execution skills and his extensive understanding of the Company’s businesses and industry.
Michael G. Morris
Director since 2012
Age 7274
Human Capital and Compensation Committee (Chair)
Executive Committee
Audit Committee

Mr. Morris served as the Chairman of the Board of American Electric Power Company, Inc., one of the largest electric utilities in the United States, from 2012 to April 2014. From January 2004 until November 2011, Mr. Morris served as the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of American Electric Power Company, Inc. From 1997 until 2003, he served as the President, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Northeast Utilities, the largest electric utility in New England. From 2013 to 2017, Mr. Morris served as a director of Spectra Energy Corp., one of North America’s leading natural gas infrastructure companies until its acquisition by Enbridge Inc., and from From 2017 to 2018, Mr. Morris served as director of Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLC, the general partner of Spectra Energy Partners (DE) GP, LP, the general partner of Spectra Energy Partners, LP, a master limited partnership engaged in the transmission, storage and gathering of natural gas, and the transportation and storage of crude oil, until its acquisition by Enbridge Inc., and from 2018 to 2019, Mr. Morris served as a director of PHL Group, Inc. Mr. Morris currently serves as a director of The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., an investment and insurance company, and as the Non-Executive Chairman of the board of directors of Alcoa Corporation, a producer of bauxite, alumina and aluminum. Mr. Morris is also a director of PLH Group, Inc. Mr. Morris served as a director of Alcoa Inc., a producer of aluminum, from 2008 to 2016, until Alcoa Inc.’s separation into two standalone, publicly-traded companies, Alcoa Corporation and Arconic Inc. Mr. Morris’s nomination wasis supported by his broad business experience and management expertise.

Sarah E. Nash
Director since 2019
Age 67
Chair of the Board
Executive Committee (Chair)
Nominating & Governance Committee (Chair)
Ms. Nash is the Chair of our Board. Ms. Nash is also Chair of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and majority shareholder of Novagard Solutions, an innovator and manufacturer of silicone sealants and coatings and hybrid and foam solutions for the Building Systems, Electronics, EV and Battery and Industrial and Transportation markets. Ms. Nash spent nearly 30 years in investment banking at JPMorgan Chase & Co. (and predecessor companies), a financial services firm, retiring as Vice Chairman in July 2005. She currently serves on the boards of directors of Blackbaud, Inc., a software company providing technology solutions for the not-for-profit industry, and Knoll, Inc., a designer and manufacturer of lifestyle and workplace furnishing, textiles and fine leathers, and privately held HBD Industries, Inc. and Irving Oil Company. Ms. Nash is Trustee of the New York-Presbyterian Hospital, a member
8

TABLE OF CONTENTS

of the National Board of the Smithsonian Institution and a member of Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (STRI), Panama. Ms. Nash holds a BA in political science from Vassar College. Ms. Nash’s nomination is supported by her extensive experience in capital markets, strategic transactions, corporate governance and non-profit organizations.
Robert H. Schottenstein
Director since 2017
Age 6668
Human Capital and Compensation Committee
Nominating & Governance Committee

Mr. Schottenstein has been the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of M/I Homes, Inc., one of the nation’s largest homebuilders, since 2004. He hasFrom 2014 to March 2021, Mr. Schottenstein served on the board of Installed Building Products, Inc., a leading installer of insulation and complementary building products for residential new construction, since 2014.construction. He also serves on the boards of The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, One Columbus, 2020, The Ohio State University Foundation and is Vice Chair and serves on the Executive Committee of Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing. Mr. Schottenstein’s nomination wasis supported by his management and business experience and involvement in various public policy issues.

Raymond ZimmermanAnne Sheehan
Director since 19842019
Age 8664
Audit Committee
Nominating & Governance Committee

Mr. Zimmerman isMs. Sheehan was the Chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Investor Advisory Committee from 2012 to 2020. From 2008 until 2018, Ms. Sheehan served as the Director of Corporate Governance at The California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS), the largest educator-only pension fund in the world and the second largest pension fund in the United States. She previously served as the Chief Deputy Director for Policy at the California Department of Finance from 2004 to 2008 and as Executive OfficerDirector at the California Building Industry Foundation from 2000 to 2004. Ms. Sheehan is a director of Service Merchandise LLC,Cohn Robbins Holdings Corp., a retail company. Mr. Zimmerman was Chairmanblank check company founded for the purpose of effecting a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more business entities. Ms. Sheehan is a founder of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of 99¢ Stuff, LLC from 1999 to 2003 andInvestor Stewardship Group, serves on the ChairmanAdvisory Board of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of 99¢ Stuff, Inc. from 2003 to 2008. Mr. Zimmerman’s nomination was supported by his financial expertise and broad business experience, particularly in the retail sector.

Directors Whose Terms Continue until the 2021 Annual Meeting

E. Gordon Gee
Director since 2012
Age 75

Dr. Gee is currently the President of West Virginia University, a large public research institution. Prior to his current serviceWeinberg Center for Corporate Governance at West Virginia University, he led several other major universities, including The Ohio State University (2007—2013, 1990—1998), Vanderbilt University (2000—2007), Brown University (1998—2000), the University of Colorado (1985—1990),Delaware, is a member of the Advisory Board of Rock Center for Corporate Governance of Stanford Law School and West Virginia University (1981—1985). Dr. Gee also currently servesis a Senior Advisor at PJT Camberview. Ms. Sheehan’s nomination is supported by her extensive experience as a director of the National 4-H Council. He previously served as a director of the Company from 1992 to 2008, as a director of Hasbro, Inc., a branded-play company, from 1999 until 2010,corporate governance professional and as a director of Bob Evans Farms, Inc., an ownerher senior management and operator of family restaurants, from 2009 until 2014. Dr. Gee’s nomination was supported by his extensive executiveleadership experience addressing complex legislative, regulatory and management experience, as well as his legal expertise and knowledge of the Company gained through his prior service as a director.

public finance issues.

6

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Stephen D. Steinour
Director since 2014
Age 6062
Audit Committee (Chair)
Executive Committee

Mr. Steinour has been the Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer of Huntington Bancshares Incorporated, a regional bank holding company, since 2009. From 2008 to 2009, Mr. Steinour was a Managing Partner in CrossHarbor Capital Partners, LLC, a recognized leading manager of alternative investments. Mr. Steinour was with Citizens Financial Group from 1992 to 2008, where he served in various executive roles, including President from 2005 to 2007 and Chief Executive Officer from 2007 to 2008. Mr. Steinour currentlyalso serves as a directorsupervisory board member of Exelon Corporation,The Clearing House, a utility services holding company.real-time payments platform. He previously served as a trustee of Liberty Property Trust, a real estate investment trust, from 2010 to 2014. Mr. Steinour also serves on the board2014, as a director of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.Cleveland, from 2017 to 2019, and as a director of Exelon Corporation, a utility services holding company, from 2007 to 2020. Mr. Steinour’s nomination wasis supported by his executive experience, financial expertise and service on several boards of directors.

Allan R. Tessler
Director since 1987
Age 82
9

TABLE OF CONTENTSMr. Tessler has been Chairman of

Retiring Directors
Leslie H. Wexner and Abigail S. Wexner have informed the Company that they will retire from the Board and Chief Executive Officereffective May 20, 2021, at the conclusion of International Financial Group, Inc., an international merchant banking firm, since 1987 and is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Teton Financial Services, a financial services company. He previously served as Chairman of the Board of Epoch Holding Corporation, an investment management company, from 2004 to 2013, as Chairman of the Board of J Net Enterprises Inc., a technology holding company, from 2000 to 2004, as Chairman of the Board of Imperva, Inc., a provider of cyber security solutions, where he served as a director from 2015 to 2019, and as a director of Steel Partners Holdings GP Inc., a general partner of a global diversified holding company, from 2010 to 2018.our annual meeting. Mr. Tessler also served as Chairman of the Board of InterWorld Corporation from 2001 to 2004 and as Chairman of Checker Holdings Corp. IV from 1997 to 2009. Mr. Tessler currently serves as Chairman of the Board of Rocky Mountain Bank, a Wyoming bank. He has served as a director of TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation, a securities brokerage company, since November 2006, and as a director of BioCardia, Inc., a clinical-stage regenerative medicine company, since 2012. Mr. Tessler currently serves as the Chair of the Audit Committee of BioCardia, Inc. Mr. Tessler’s nomination was supported by his broad business experience and financial expertise, together with his involvement in various public policy issues.

Abigail S. Wexner
Director since 1997
Age 57

Mrs. Wexner is the chairman, CEO and Founderhusband of Whitebarn Associates, LLC a private investment company. She serves on the boards of Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc., a manufacturer of high performance thermoplastic corrugated pipe, The Ohio State University, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, the Columbus Downtown Development Corporation, the Columbus Partnership, Pelotonia, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The Wexner Foundation, The Columbus Jewish Federation and the United States Equestrian Team Foundation. She is founder and chair of the board for The Center for Family Safety and Healing, founding board member and vice chair of the board for KIPP Columbus and a past chair of the Governing Committee of the Columbus Foundation. Mrs. Wexner is the wife of Leslie H. Wexner. Mrs. Wexner’s nomination was supported by her executive and legal experience, as well as her expertise with respect to a wide range of diversity, philanthropic and public policy issues.

Former Directors

David T. Kollat and Dennis S. Hersch have determined not to stand for reelection. We thank them for their years of exceptional commitmentcontributions, dedication and distinguished service to the Company.

Accordingly, the size of the Board will be reduced to 10 members immediately following the conclusion of our annual meeting and, therefore, stockholders may only cast their vote with respect to the 10 director nominees described above.

Director Independence

The Board has determined that each of the individuals nominated to serve on the Board together with David T. Kollat and each of the members of the Board who will continue to serve after the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders (except for Abigail S. Wexner and Leslie H. Wexner)Andrew M. Meslow), has no material relationship with the Company other than in his or her capacity as a director of the Company and that each is “independent” in accordance with applicable NYSE standards. If all director nominees are elected to serve as our directors, independent directors will constitute over 80%90% of our Board.

In making these determinations, the Board took into account all factors and circumstances that it considered relevant, including, where applicable, the existence of any employment relationship between the director (or nominee)nominee or a member of the director’s (or nominee’s)director nominee’s immediate family and the Company; whether within the past

7

TABLE OF CONTENTS

three years the director (or nominee)nominee has served as an executive officer of the Company; whether the director (or nominee)nominee or a member of the director’s (or nominee’s)director nominee’s immediate family has received, during any twelve-month period within the last three years, direct compensation from the Company in excess of $120,000; whether the director (or nominee)nominee or a member of the director’s (or nominee’s)director nominee’s immediate family has been, within the last three years, a partner or an employee of the Company’s internal or external auditors; and whether the director (or nominee)nominee or a member of the director’s (or nominee’s)director nominee’s immediate family is employed by an entity that is engaged in business dealings with the Company. The Board has not adopted categorical standards with respect to director independence. The Board believes that it is more appropriate to make independence determinations on a case-by-case basis in light of all relevant factors.

Board Leadership Structure

Mr. Leslie H. Wexner serves as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of the Company. Mr. Wexner is the founder of the Company. Mr. Wexner (through his personal and beneficial holdings) is also the Company’s largest stockholder. The Board believes that Mr. Wexner’s experience and expertise in the Company’s business and operations is unrivaled and that he is uniquely qualified to lead the Company. Accordingly, the Company believes that Mr. Wexner’s service as both Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer is a significant benefit to the Company and provides more effective leadership than could be achieved in another leadership structure.

Allan R. Tessler currently serves as the lead independent director. In July 2012, the Board determined that the lead independent director should be appointed solely by the independent directors, as they deem appropriate, and Mr. Tessler was subsequently reappointed as the lead independent director by them. As lead independent director, Mr. Tessler has the authority to call meetings of the independent directors, at which he serves as the chairman. Mr. Tessler also approves information sent to the Board, including the agenda for Board meetings, and is responsible for approving meeting schedules in order to assure that there is sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items.

The Company believes that the lead independent director structure, including Mr. Tessler’s service as lead independent director, offers independent oversight of the Company’s management to complement the leadership that Mr. Wexner provides to the Board as its Chairman.

Structure; Risk Oversight; Certain Compensation Matters

Ms. Nash, an independent director, serves as the Chair of the Board.
The Board, directly and through the Audit Committee and other committees of the Board, takes an active role in the oversight of the Company’s policies with respect to the assessment and management of enterprise risk. Among other things, the Board has policies in place for identifying the senior executive responsible for key risks as well as the Board committees with oversight responsibility for particular key risks. In a number of cases, oversight is conducted by the full Board.

Among other things, the Company, including the CompensationHCC Committee, of the Board, has evaluated the Company’s compensation structure from the perspective of enterprise risk. The Company, including the CompensationHCC Committee, believes that the Company’s compensation structures are appropriate and do not incentivize inappropriate taking of business risks.

Cybersecurity Risk

The Board and the Audit Committee take an active role in thehas oversight of the Company’s cybersecurity and data security policies. Among other things,All members of the Board periodically reviews with membersAudit Committee are independent directors. Members of management of the Company regularly brief the Board on issues relating to information security, fraud, data security and cybersecurity risk and developments, as well as the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures.

Review of Strategic Plans and Capital Structure

The Board regularly reviews the Company’s strategic plans and capital structure with a view toward long-term value creation, including environmental, socialcreation.
Board Oversight of Environmental and governance considerations. The Board also conducts a strategic planning retreat at least annually with senior management.

Social Matters

8

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Social Responsibility

The Company is a values-based company, and we strive to operate our business according to high standards of social responsibility. The Board, with the support, as relevant, of its HCC Committee and the Nominating & Governance Committee, reviews issues of social responsibility, including diversity, equity, and inclusion, environmental,ESG and philanthropic and governance matters,initiatives, and the Company’s policies, practices and progress with respect to such issues. Key areas of focus and highlights include:

10

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Commitment
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. Led by our Offices of Inclusion, we implemented a more robust enterprise strategy for diversity, equity and inclusion, based on the pillars of recruitment, education and development, engagement and retention, community and business. This includes the recruitment, retention and advancement of diverse talent among our Board, workforce and suppliers, that reflects the customers we serve and our communities. Specifically, we are taking the following steps:
Leaders, including our CEO, are engaging in conversations with individual associates and teams to improving the communities where we do business. In 2018, we donated more than 55,000 associate volunteer hours in the United States, Canadalisten and Asia,learn. We are committed to providing both large and invested more than $15 millionsmall, formal and informal forums for associates to non-profit organizations in our home office communities through the L Brands Foundation.be heard.
EmpoweringWe have gathered and joiningare sharing resources to provide education, tools and insights for our associates on managing bias and being an ally.
As noted below, we have increased our investment in funding research withorganizations that fund the goalfight against racism and inequality.
As an indication of ending cancer. Lastour efforts in this area, we have scored between 95 and 100 on the Human Rights Campaign’s Corporate Equality Index every year together with associates, we raised more than $8.7 million for the James Cancer Centerpast decade, with a perfect score of The Ohio State University, bringing100 in 2020.
Respecting Human Rights and the 10 year total to $59 million. In addition we have sponsored the world’s largest Komen Race for the Cure corporate team for the last nine years.
Selection of vendorsPlanet throughout our Supply Chain. We select suppliers based on their ability and commitment to meet our stringent standards related to safety, and quality, standards, and to follow our strict ethical labor and environmental standards.the environment. The majority of our production comes from the United States, China, Vietnam, Sri Lanka, Indonesia and India and includes many long-term strategic partners. Suppliers are audited for compliance with our supplier code of conduct, with particular emphasis on forced labor.
Reducing our Environmental Impact.
Reduction of
Driving toward sustainable materials. We are working to reduce our environmental impact through the use of more sustainable materials and the introduction of programs to reduce energy consumption.fibers and partnerships with more environmentally responsible suppliers. For example, under the Company’s Forest Products Procurement Policy, we work with our suppliers to source packaging and products that include recycled content or is produced with pulp– including those containing man-made cellulosic fibers – from certified forestry operations and have phased out products sourced fromto reduce the pressures on endangered forests. Additionally, the Company participates in global initiatives to improve cotton farming and, by the end of 2021, will procure 50% of the Company's cotton through these more sustainable sources.
PromotionMinimizing use of environmentally sensitive practices.hazardous chemicals. We are committed to the goal ofhave built a chemical management program (including supplier training) aimed at eliminating the discharge of 14priority chemical categories in conjunction with the manufacturing of our apparel products and have adopted the Zero Discharge of Hazardous Chemicals (ZDHC) Manufacturing Restricted Substances List (MRSL).
Reducing energy consumption, water use and greenhouse gas emissions. We have rolled out numerous energy-efficiency projects, such as use of LED lamps in stores, home offices and distribution centers. We also have a commitment to using efficient means of transporting our goods. Since 2006, we have been a partner in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s SmartWay Transport Partnership program, which works with companies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution from transportation of goods. And since 2009, we have been a member of the Ceres Business for Innovative Climate and Energy Policy (BICEP), an advocacy coalition of businesses committed to working with policymakers to pass meaningful energy and climate legislation. With respect to water use, we have taken steps to conserve water use in our buildings and in landscaping.
Supporting our Communities. In 2020, we invested more than $8 million in non-profit organizations in our home office communities through the L Brands Foundation, which included expanding our commitment to long-time community partners, the National Urban League and YWCA, by 2020.donating $1 million in 2020 to each of them (through their national and Columbus-based affiliates) to support the fight against racism and inequality.
11
Recruitment, retention

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Empowering and advancementJoining our Associates in Funding Research with the Goal of talentEnding Cancer. In 2020, we contributed to organizations such as Pelotonia and Susan G. Komen to support cancer research. Since 2010, L Brands has raised more than $65 million for Pelotonia where 100% of every participant-raised dollar funds cancer research at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute.
Responding to COVID. Utilizing various COVID-19 safety measures that reflectsare designed to align with guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we have taken a number of steps to protect our employees and customers, we serveincluding use of temperature checks and verifications from our communities. The Company earnedassociates that they are symptom-free; compensation for our associates who are quarantining due to a perfect score on the Human Rights Campaign 2018 Corporate Equality Index.positive COVID-19 test; providing face masks to our associates and instituting policies for use of face masks; taking steps to promote social distancing at our stores, distribution centers and customer care centers; and increasing our cleaning regimen.

Human Capital Management

The Board recognizes that attracting, developing and retaining the best people is crucial to all aspects of the Company’s activities and long-term success and has oversight of the development and implementation of our human capital management programs, including diversity and inclusion practices and initiatives, recruiting, retention and career development and progression. Among other things, the Board reviews with members of management of the Company issues relating to human capital management such as employeeassociate engagement, workforce planning and demographics, diversity and inclusion strategies and our corporate culture.

culture and in 2020 the Board adopted a new charter for the HCC Committee.

Succession Planning

The Board and its Nominating & Governance Committee have developed policies and principles governing succession planning with respect to the CEO and senior management.

Information Concerning Board Meeting Attendance

Our Board held 1023 meetings in fiscal year 2018.2020. During fiscal year 2018,2020, all of the then-current directors attended 75% or more of the total number of meetings of the Board and of the committees of the Board on which they served (which were held during the period in which they served).

Committees of the Board

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee of the Board is instrumental in the Board’s fulfillment of its oversight responsibilities relating to (i) the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, (ii) the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (iii) the qualifications, independence and performance of the Company’s independent auditors and (iv) the performance of the Company’s internal audit function. The current members of the Audit Committee are Ms.Mr. Steinour (Chair), Mses. James (Chair), Dr. Kollat and Messrs. Schottenstein, TesslerSheehan and Zimmerman.Mr. Morris. The Board has determined that each of the Audit Committee members meets the independence, expertise and experience standards established by the NYSE and the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) for service on the Audit Committee of the Board and for designation as an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of the regulations promulgated by the Commission.

9

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Report of the Audit Committee can be found on page 55 of this proxy statement. The Audit Committee held 1213 meetings in fiscal year 2018.

2020.

Human Capital and Compensation Committee

The CompensationHCC Committee of the Board (i) oversees generally workforce management and development of the human capital of the Company, as well as the Company’s compensation and benefits philosophy and policies, generally, (ii) evaluates the CEO’s performance and overseescompensation and sets his or her compensation, for the CEO, (iii) oversees the evaluation process and compensation structure for other members of the Company’s senior management and (iv) fulfills the other responsibilities set forth in its charter. In 2020, the Board adopted a new charter for the HCC Committee. The current members of the CompensationHCC Committee are Dr. KollatMr. Morris (Chair), Dr. GeeMs. Bellinger and Mr. Morris.Schottenstein. The Board has determined that each of the current Human Capital and Compensation Committee members is “independent” in accordance with applicable NYSE standards.
12

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Report of the CompensationHCC Committee can be found on pagespage 48 to 4950 of this proxy statement. The CompensationHCC Committee held 1214 meetings in fiscal year 2018.

2020.

Nominating & Governance Committee

The Nominating & Governance Committee of the Board actively engages in the ongoing review of the composition of the Board and opportunities for Board refreshment. Based on its review, the Nominating & Governance Committee identifies and recommends to the Board candidates who are qualified to serve on the Board and its committees. The Nominating & Governance Committee also considers and reviews the qualifications of any individual nominated for election to the Board by stockholders. It is responsible for proposing a slate of candidates for election as directors at each annual meeting of stockholders. If all of our nominees are elected this year, we wouldWe have added fiveeight new directors since 2014, seven of whom are independent directors, who bring a diversity of skills, attributes and perspectives to the Board. In addition to ongoing Board refreshment, we believe that a variety of director tenures is beneficial to ensure Board quality and continuity of experience, as reflected in the current composition of our Board.

The Nominating & Governance Committee develops and recommends to the Board criteria and procedures for the selection and evaluation of new individuals to serve as directors and committee members. In assessing director nominees, the Nominating & Governance Committee takes into account the qualifications of existing directors for continuing service or re-nomination, which may be affected by, among other things, the quality of their contributions, their attendance records, changes in their primary employment or other business affiliations, the number of boards of publicly held companies on which they serve or other competing demands on their time and attention. While the Board has not established any specific minimum qualifications for director nominees, as indicated in the Company’s corporate governance principles, the directors and any potential nominees should possess the integrity, judgment, skills, experience and other characteristics that are deemed necessary or desirable for the effective performance of the Board’s oversight function. Certain of the skills, qualifications and particular areas of expertise considered with respect to the members of the Board at the time each Director was nominated are summarized on page 6 of this proxy statement and in the director biographies found on pages 57 through 79 of this proxy statement. Although the Nominating & Governance Committee does not use formal quantitative or similar criteria with regard to diversity in its selection process, the Company’s corporate governance principles provide that the Board will be composed of members of diverse backgrounds and, accordingly, the Committee considers the diversity of experience, background and expertise of the current directors and areas where new directors might add additional perspectives, as factors in the selection of Board nominees.

If all director nominees are elected to serve as our directors, six of our directors will be women, including our Chair of the Board, four of whom are ethnically diverse. The Company will continue to require that the initial pool of candidates identified to be considered for any future Board vacancy include persons reflecting a diversity of race, ethnicity and gender. In addition, in connection with the use of a third-party search firm to identify external candidates who are qualified to serve as potential successors to the CEO, the Board will instruct such third-party search firm to take into consideration the Company’s commitment to diversity as defined above.

The Nominating & Governance Committee does not have a formal policy on the consideration of director candidates recommended by stockholders. The Board believes that it is more appropriate to provide the Nominating & Governance Committee flexibility in evaluating stockholder recommendations. In the event that a director nominee is recommended by a stockholder, the Nominating & Governance Committee will give due consideration to the director nominee and will use the same criteria used for evaluating Board director nominees, in addition to considering the information relating to the director nominee provided by the stockholder.

The Company engaged a search firm to assist the Nominating & Governance Committee in identifying and evaluating potential directors.

The Nominating & Governance Committee also develops and recommends to the Board, and regularly reviews, a set of corporate governance principles for the Company to ensure they reflect evolving best practices, monitors compliance with those principles and stays abreast of developments in the area of corporate governance. For example, a proxy access bylaw was adopted in November 2016, permitting up to 20 stockholders owning 3% or more of the outstanding shares of Common Stock continuously for at least three years to nominate the greater of two directors

10

TABLE OF CONTENTS

or up to 20% of the Board and include those nominees in our proxy materials. The Nominating & Governance Committee also reviews and periodically makes recommendations to the Board regarding the structure, practices, policies and activities of the Board and its committees. Each Board committee’s charter is reviewed at least annually. To ensure that the Board, Board committees and individual directors remain effective, the Nominating & Governance Committee oversees a robust annual evaluation of the Board, each Board committee and each individual director and recommends ways to improve performance. At least annually, each of the Audit Committee, the CompensationHCC Committee and the Nominating & Governance Committee evaluates its own performance and reports to the Board on such evaluation. The full Board also engages in self-evaluation at least annually. The current

13

TABLE OF CONTENTS

members of the Nominating & Governance Committee are Mr. TesslerMs. Nash (Chair), Ms.Mses. Bellinger, James and Dr. Kollat.Sheehan and Mr. Schottenstein. The Board has determined that each of the current Nominating & Governance Committee members is “independent” in accordance with applicable NYSE standards.

The Nominating & Governance Committee held 35 meetings in fiscal year 2018.

2020.

Executive Committee

The Executive Committee of the Board may exercise, to the fullest extent permitted by law, all of the powers and authority granted to the Board. Among other things, the Executive Committee may declare dividends, authorize the issuance of stock and authorize the seal of the Company to be affixed to papers that require it. The current members of the Executive Committee are Messrs. WexnerMs. Nash (Chair) and Tessler.

Finance Committee

The Finance Committee of the Board periodically reviews the Company’s financial positionMessrs. Morris and financial arrangements with banks and other financial institutions. The Finance Committee also makes recommendations on financial matters that it believes are necessary, advisable or appropriate. The current members of the Finance Committee are Mr. Tessler (Chair), Mr. Hersch, Dr. Kollat, Mrs. Wexner and Mr. Zimmerman.

Inclusion Committee

The Inclusion Committee of the Board is instrumental in the Board’s fulfillment of its oversight responsibilities relating to, among other things, (i) the Company’s commitment to diversity and inclusion and (ii) the performance of the Company’s Office of Inclusion. The current members of the Inclusion Committee are Mrs. Wexner (Chair), Ms. Bellinger, Dr. Gee and Ms. James.

Retiring Committee Members

Effective as of the annual meeting, Mr. Hersch and Dr. Kollat will conclude service on the Board and the respective Committees on which they serve.

Steinour.

Meetings of the Company’s Non-Management Directors

The non-management directors and the independent directors of the Board meet in regular executive session in connection with each regularly scheduled Board meeting. Mr. Tesslersessions. Ms. Nash serves as the chair of those meetings. Mr. Meslow does not attend any meetings which neitherof the non-management directors or the independent directors, and Mr. Wexner norand Mrs. Wexner attends.

did not attend any meetings of the non-management directors or the independent directors.

Communications with Stockholders

The Board believes that it is important to understand stockholder perspectives on the Company and foster long-term relationships with stockholders and, to that end, we have a policy of robust engagement with stockholders, with continuing outreach to and dialogue with all of our major investors on a range of issues, including corporate governance matters and environmental and social goals and initiatives. Such engagements with investors have been highly constructive. The Board also provides a process for interested parties to send communications to the full Board, the non-management members of the Board the lead independent director and the members of the Audit Committee. Any director may be contacted by writing to him or her c/o L Brands, Inc., Three Limited Parkway, Columbus, Ohio 43230 or emailing at boardofdirectors@lb.com. Any stockholder wishing to contact Audit Committee members may send an email to auditcommittee@lb.com. Communications that are not related to a director’s duties and responsibilities as a Board member, a non-management director or an Audit Committee member may be excluded by the Office of the General Counsel, including, without limitation, solicitations and

11

TABLE OF CONTENTS

advertisements; junk mail; product-related communications; job referral materials such as resumes; surveys; and any other material that is determined to be illegal or otherwise inappropriate. The directors to whom such information is addressed are informed that the information has been removed and that it will be made available to such directors upon request.

Attendance at Annual Meetings

The Company does not have a formal policy regarding attendance by members of the Board at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders. However, it encourages directors to attend and historically nearly all have done so. All of the then-current Board members attended the 20182020 annual meeting, except for Mr. Morris.meeting. Each director is expected to dedicate sufficient time, energy and attention to ensure the diligent performance of his or her duties, including by attending meetings of the Board and the committees of which he or she is a member.

Code of Conduct, Related Person Transaction Policy and Associated Matters

The Company has a code of conduct that is applicable to all employees of the Company, including the CEO and Chief Financial Officer (the “CFO”), and to members of the Board. Any amendments to the code or any waivers from any provisions of the code granted to executive officers or directors will be promptly disclosed to stockholders through posting on the Company’s website at www.lb.com.

Under the Company’s Related Person Transaction Policy (the “Policy”), subject to certain exceptions, directors and executive officers of the Company are required to notify the Company of the existence or potential existence of any financial or commercial transaction, agreement or relationship involving the Company in which a director or executive officer or his or her immediate family members has a direct or indirect material interest. Each such transaction must be approved by the Board or a committee consisting solely of independent directors after consideration of all material facts and circumstances.

The Company is engaged in several projects designed to increase our speed and agility in producing products that satisfy our customers. In the case of our beauty, personal care and home fragrance businesses, the development
14

TABLE OF CONTENTS

of supplier facilities in close proximity to our headquarters and distribution facilities in central Ohio has been an integral part of capturing the many business benefits of speed and agility. The New Albany Company, a business beneficially owned by Mr. and Mrs. Wexner, is in the business of developing real estate, including industrial parks, and has sold land (and may in the future sell land) to certain vendors or third party developers in connection with the continuing development of an industrial park focused on the foregoing business categories in New Albany, Ohio. The Audit Committee monitors such vendor and third party transactions on an ongoing basis to assure that they are in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders generally.

Copies of the Company’s Code of Conduct, Corporate Governance Principles, Policy and Committee Charters

The Company’s code of conduct, corporate governance principles and Policy, as well as the charters of the Audit Committee, CompensationHCC Committee and Nominating & Governance Committee of the Board, are available on the Company’s website at www.lb.com. Stockholders may also request a copy of any such document from: L Brands, Inc., Attention: Investor Relations, Three Limited Parkway, Columbus, Ohio 43230.

15

12


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending February 1, 2020.January 29, 2022. Ernst & Young LLP has been retained as the Company’s independent registered public accountants continuously since 2003.

The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the Company’s independent registered public accountants. The Audit Committee is responsible for approving the fees associated with the Company’s retention of Ernst & Young LLP. In accordance with Commissionthe Commission’s rules, Ernst & Young LLP’s lead engagement partner rotates every five years. The Audit Committee is directly involved in the selection of Ernst & Young LLP’s lead engagement partner. In addition, the Audit Committee evaluates Ernst & Young LLP’s qualifications, performance and independence and presents its conclusions on these matters to the Board on at least an annual basis, and annually considers whether to continue its engagement of Ernst & Young LLP.

The members of the Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued retention of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accountants is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. We are asking you to ratify Ernst & Young LLP’s appointment, although your ratification is not required. A representative of Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Additional information concerning the Company’s engagement of Ernst & Young LLP is included on page 56.

The Board recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accountants.

13

16

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER
COMPENSATION

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection

Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires us to provide an advisory stockholder vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers (“NEOs”), as such compensation is disclosed pursuant to the disclosure rules of the Commission. After the Company’s 2017 annual meeting, the Board determined to hold this advisory “say-on-pay” vote every year. Accordingly, the Company is providing its stockholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on the fiscal 20182020 compensation of our NEOs as disclosed in this proxy statement, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (the “CD&A”), the compensation tables and other narrative executive compensation disclosures.

Stockholders are being asked to vote on the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve the compensation of the Company’s executive officers named in the 20182020 Summary Compensation Table, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K (which disclosure includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and other narrative executive compensation disclosures).”

This past year has been like no other when it comes to change and a challenging environment. We have been preparing to operate Bath & Body Works and Victoria’s Secret as separate, standalone companies. We implemented cost reduction and performance improvements at Victoria’s Secret, which includes Victoria’s Secret Lingerie, PINK and Victoria’s Secret Beauty (referred to collectively as “VS NewCo”), while continuing to drive strong growth at Bath & Body Works. This work has been done in the midst of a global pandemic that has forced us, and most critically, our executive leadership, to be creative and agile, adopt new ways of working and implement best-in-class safety measures.
To navigate our business transformation, and manage this crisis, our Board prioritized establishing a leadership team that will address the challenges facing the business and position our brands for success, resulting in changes at the most senior executive levels. In May 2020, our founder, Leslie H. Wexner, stepped down as CEO and Chairman of the Board of L Brands, remaining a member of the Board as Chairman Emeritus. Andrew M. Meslow, previously CEO of Bath & Body Works, was named CEO of L Brands and joined the Board. Stuart B. Burgdoerfer, current CFO of L Brands, took on the added role of interim CEO for VS NewCo.
At the end of June 2020, Charles C. McGuigan stepped down from his role as Chief Operating Officer of L Brands and CEO of Mast Global. In September 2020, Julie B. Rosen was hired as President at Bath & Body Works to lead the development of products across all categories. In October 2020, Shelley M. Milano left her role as Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer, allowing for separate human resources leadership teams for each of Bath & Body Works and VS NewCo going forward. Deon N. Riley joined L Brands in December 2020 to fill the Chief Human Resources Officer role for L Brands and Bath & Body Works.
Following these changes, at the end of fiscal 2020, our NEOs are as follows:
Andrew M. Meslow, CEO of L Brands.
Stuart B. Burgdoerfer, CFO of L Brands and interim CEO of VS NewCo.
James L. Bersani, President, Real Estate.
Julie B. Rosen, President, Bath & Body Works.
Deon N. Riley, Chief Human Resources Officer, L Brands and Bath & Body Works.
In addition the following former executive officers who departed during fiscal 2020 are also treated as NEOs under the Commission’s rules:
Leslie H. Wexner, former CEO.
Charles C. McGuigan, former Chief Operating Officer of L Brands and CEO of Mast Global.
Shelley M. Milano, former Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer.
We are committed to aligning our executive compensation with our Company’s performance. OverIn connection with the last several years, the Company implemented a series of initiatives designed to better position several ofCompany’s strong performance in fiscal 2020, our businesses for the future. TheCEO earned above-target short-term effects of some of these initiatives have not produced the results that are expected. In response, the Compensation Committee reduced our CEO’s target and actual compensation each year since 2016. These actions by the Compensation Committee (summarized below), resulted in CEO compensation that decreased 83% from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2018 while total shareholder return decreased 66% during this same period.

2017 Compensation Actions

Did not grant a Fall 2017 long-term performance-based equityperformance incentive award. As a result, CEO long-term performance-based equity awards for fiscal 2017 were 70% ($3.5 million) below target.
Exercised negative discretion to eliminate the Fall season short-term incentive payout, resulting in a total 2017 payout that was 75% ($3.3 million) below target.
As a result of these actions, CEO compensation was 60% ($6.8 million) below the reduced target for fiscal 2017.
CEO total compensation decreased by 61% ($9.1 million) from fiscal 2016 to fiscal 2017 while total shareholder return decreased by 15% during the same period.

2018 Compensation Actions

The Compensation Committee adjusted Mr. Wexner’s target compensation for fiscal 2018 to reduce the amount of fixed compensation and put greater emphasis on performance-based compensation:

Adjusted base salary from $2 million to $1 million, a reduction of 50% or $1 million.
Reduced the short-term performance-based incentive compensation target from $4.4 million to $1.5 million, a reduction of 66% or $2.9 million.
Adjusted the pay mix, increasing the weighting of long-term performance-based incentive compensation from 44% to 72% of total direct compensation.
Decreased total direct compensation at target from $11.4 million to $9.0 million, a reduction of 21% or $2.4 million.
Actual direct CEO compensation for fiscal 2018 was $3.9 million or 57% ($5.1 million) below the reduced target.
Over the three-year period from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2018, CEO compensation decreased 83% while total shareholder return decreased 66%.

17

14


TABLE OF CONTENTS

2019 Compensation Actions

The Compensation Committee further adjusted Mr. Wexner’s target compensation

payments according to the payout formulas established at the beginning of each six-month performance period without retroactive adjustment for the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on results. Long-term equity incentives were granted to our CEO as a one-time incentive in connection with his promotion during fiscal 2019 by reducing2020. Substantially all of the amountlong-term incentive is subject to challenging performance requirements that will only be earned if the Company achieves rigorous growth, profitability and return metrics that provide incentive for a balance of fixed compensationgrowth and long-term performance-based incentive compensation at target:

Reduced base salary from $1 million to $900,000, a reductionprofitability, support the strategic direction of 10%.the Company, and alignment with stockholders.
Reduced long-term performance-based incentive compensation target from $6.5 million to $5.1 million.
Decreased total direct compensation at target from $9.0 million to $7.5 million, a reduction of 17% or $1.5 million.

Although the advisory stockholder vote on executive compensation is non-binding, the CompensationHCC Committee has considered and will continue to consider the outcome of the vote and feedback received from stockholders when making future compensation decisions for NEOs. In 2018, 98.5%2020, 90.9% of the shares voting on the proposal voted in favor of our executive compensation program.

Please refer to the CD&A for a detailed discussion of the Company’s executive compensation principles and practices and the fiscal 20182020 compensation of our NEOs.

Board Recommendation

Mr. Wexner’s total compensation for fiscal 2018 was $4.6 million, which is well below the median of our peers. In addition, 2019 target pay is 39% below the median. In summary, there

There is alignment between our performance, our stockholders’ interests and our CEO’s pay.

TheNEOs’ pay; therefore, the Board recommends a vote FOR this proposal.

18

15


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL 4: STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL TO REMOVE SUPERMAJORITY VOTING REQUIREMENTS

REGARDING STOCKHOLDER ACTION BY WRITTEN CONSENT

John Chevedden, 2215 Nelson Ave., No. 205 Redondo Beach, CA 90278, owner of 90 shares of Common Stock, has notified the Company that he intends to submit the following proposal at this year’s meeting:

Proposal 4—Simple Majority Vote

RESOLVED, 4 – Shareholder Right to Act by Written Consent

Shareholders request that our board of directors take each stepthe necessary sosteps to permit written consent by the shareholders entitled to cast the minimum number of votes that each voting requirement in our charter and bylaws (that is explicit or implicit due to default to state law) that calls for a greater than simple majority votewould be eliminated, and replaced by a requirement for a majority of the votes cast for and against applicable proposals, or a simple majority in compliance with applicable laws. If necessary this means the closest standard to a majority of the votes cast for and against such proposals consistent with applicable laws. This proposal includes taking the steps necessary to adjournauthorize an action at a meeting at which all shareholders entitled to vote thereon were present and voting. This includes shareholder ability to initiate any appropriate topic for written consent.
Taking action by written consent in place of a meeting is a means shareholders can use to raise important matters outside the normal annual meeting cycle like the election of a new director.
Michael Morris, Robert Schottenstein and Donna James were each rejected by 20 to solicit25 million votes each in 2020. Mr. Morris chaired the management pay committee and management pay was rejected by 20 million votes necessary for approval ifplus the votes for approval are lacking during the annual meeting.

Adjourn is mentioned 17 times in our bylaws. management stock option plan was rejected by 24 million votes.

This proposal topic won 95%-support at Dover Corporation and 88%-support at AT&T.
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK) said it adopted written consent in 2019 after 45% support for a written consent shareholder proposal. This proposal could obtain 45% support or more at our 2021 annual meeting.
A shareholder right to act by written consent still affords LB management strong protection for a management holdout mentality for the status quo during the current rapidly changing business environment. Any action taken by written consent would still need 62% supermajority approval from 74%the shares that normally cast ballots at the LB annual meeting to 88%equal the required majority vote from all LB shares outstanding.
With the avalanche of bare bones online shareholder meetings in 2020 shareholder engagement and management transparency have taken a big hit. Shareholders are so restricted in online meetings that management will never want a return to the much more transparent in-person shareholder meeting format. This is all the more reason to support this corporate governance enhancement of shareholder written consent.
Shareholders are restricted in making their views known at Weyerhaeuser, Alcoa, Waste Management, Goldman Sachs, FirstEnergy, McGraw-Hillonline shareholder meetings because all constructive questions and Macy’s. comments can be screened out by management. For instance the Goodyear shareholder meeting was spoiled by a trigger-happy management mute button for shareholders. And AT&T, with 3000 institutional shareholders, would not even allow shareholders to speak.
The proponentssole content of these proposals included Ray T. Cheveddenan online special shareholder meeting can be a few stilted formalities and William Steiner. the announcement of the vote with an almost total absence of communication, outreach or engagement with shareholders.
Now more than ever shareholders need to have the option to take action outside of a shareholder meeting and send a wake-up call to management, if need be, since tightly controlled online shareholder meetings are the Death Valley of shareholder engagement and management transparency.
Please vote yes:
Shareholder Right to Act by Written Consent – Proposal 4
19

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our Response—Statement in Opposition to Stockholder Proposal Regarding Stockholder Action by Written Consent
The votes would have been higher than 74% to 88% if all shareholders had equal access to independent proxy voting advice. Currently a 1%-minority can frustrateBoard has carefully considered the willabove proposal and believes that it is not in the best interests of our 74%-shareholder majority on certain issues in an election in which 75% of shares cast ballots.

Adoption of this proposal would facilitate the adoption of annual election of each director. It is ridiculous to for an L Brands director beyond age 80 to run for a 3-year term and we had 4 such directors. Plus our stock is in the cellar. In 5-years of a robust market our stock dropped from $61 to $37.

Please vote yes:

Simple Majority Vote—Proposal 4

Our Response—Statement Regarding Stockholder Proposal to Remove Supermajority Voting Requirements

After careful consideration,stockholders. Consequently, the Board recommends a vote FOR thisAGAINST the proposal.

Our stockholders already have the ability to act outside the annual meeting cycle.
Our stockholders have very significant, year-round avenues for raising important matters with our Board. Our bylaws permit holders of 25% or more of our stock to request a special meeting, which is a powerful means to consider and approve stockholder-sponsored actions and timely effect changes while ensuring the participation of all stockholders and retaining important procedural safeguards.
The proposal could deprive stockholders of the right to participate in key decisions affecting the Company.
The Board believes that the proposal could result in stockholder proposal. Regardlessdisenfranchisement, as it could lead to stockholders being denied the ability to vote or otherwise have a say on proposed stockholder actions. Unlike stockholder actions taken at an annual or special meeting, stockholder actions by written consent can be taken without prior notice to, and without a vote of, whetherother stockholders. This would enable certain stockholders, including small groups of large, self-interested stockholders, to take actions—effectively in secret—without the involvement of other stockholders, unlike actions taken at stockholder meetings that ensure the participation of all stockholders and the opportunity for discussion.
The proposal lacks procedural safeguards that allow stockholders to make informed decisions.
The Board believes that the proposal could result in stockholders being denied the opportunity to receive information about proposed actions and to make informed decisions. The approval of proposals at stockholder meetings ensures that proposals are widely disseminated to stockholders through a proxy statement and any additional soliciting materials, which must contain information about the proposed action as specified by the Commission. If a meeting is convened, the Board is provided with an opportunity to present its analysis and recommendations to stockholders. Further, the proxy statement and any additional soliciting materials must be distributed to all stockholders in advance of the meeting, providing stockholders with sufficient time and opportunity to consider the proposals before voting.
In contrast, stockholder action by written consent lacks these procedural safeguards. There is no requirement in the proposal to provide stockholders with a description of the proposed action or the reasons for the proposed action. It may be possible for some stockholders to take action without providing proper disclosure to other stockholders that discusses the issues that are the subject of the consent solicitation, or providing any information regarding themselves or their interests in the proposed action. As notice is not required, stockholders may not have sufficient time or opportunity to evaluate the proposed action. Further, the Board does not have the opportunity to provide its views to stockholders with respect to a proposed action by written consent. It may therefore be generally more difficult for stockholders to make a considered decision on such proposed actions.
This proposal would also be costly and disruptive for the Company. Permitting solicitations and action outside of, and in addition to, the traditional setting of a stockholder meeting could result in significant commitments of additional time and expense on the part of the Company with little corresponding benefit to stockholders. In addition, given the lack of procedural safeguards, different groups of stockholders could undertake duplicative and opposing written consents on the same proposal, resulting in confusion and inefficiencies.
The Company’s current policies already demonstrate responsiveness and accountability.
The Board believes that the Company’s strong corporate governance practices makes the adoption of this proposal is approved by stockholders,unnecessary, provide transparency and accountability of the Board will taketo all stockholders and demonstrate that the necessary stepsCompany is responsive to submit its own proposal atstockholder concerns:
In 2020, as part of the 2020 annual meeting to amendCompany’s ongoing review of corporate governance practices, the Company amended our certificate of incorporation to eliminate the classified board structure and provide for all directors to be elected annually by stockholders. In addition, stockholders can remove supermajority voting requirements.

The Board recommends a vote FOR the Stockholder Proposal to Remove Supermajority Voting Requirements.

directors with or without cause.

20

16


TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS

Compensation Discussion

In 2020, in response to stockholder feedback, the Company amended our certificate of incorporation to eliminate all supermajority voting provisions.
The Company’s bylaws provide proxy access permitting a stockholder (or a group of up to 20 stockholders) owning 3% or more of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock continuously for at least three years, to nominate and Analysis

Executive Summary

   We are committed to aligning our executive compensation with our Company’s performance. Over the last several years, the Company implemented a series of initiatives designed to better position several of our businesses for the future. The short-term effects of some of these initiatives have not produced the results that are expected. In response, the Compensation Committee reduced our CEO’s target and actual compensation each year since 2016. These actions by the Compensation Committee (summarized below), resulted in CEO compensation that decreased 83% from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2018 while total shareholder return decreased 66% during this same period.
   The Board reviews the Company’s short- and long-term strategy with our CEO and management team regularly. As we have done in the past, we will continue to calibrate our CEO’s compensation to the results of the business, and to the returns of our stakeholders.
2017 Compensation Actions
   •
Did not grant a Fall 2017 long-term performance-based equity incentive award. As a result, CEO long-term performance-based equity awards for fiscal 2017 were 70% ($3.5 million) below target.
   •
Exercised negative discretion to eliminate the Fall season short-term incentive payout, resulting in a total 2017 payout that was 75% ($3.3 million) below target.
   •
As a result of these actions, CEO compensation was 60% ($6.8 million) below the reduced target for fiscal 2017.
   •
CEO total compensation decreased by 61% ($9.1 million) from fiscal 2016 to fiscal 2017, while total shareholder return decreased by 15% during the same period.
2018 Compensation Actions
   The Compensation Committee adjusted Mr. Wexner’s target compensation for fiscal 2018 to reduce the amount of fixed compensation and put greater emphasis on performance-based compensation:
   •
Adjusted base salary from $2 million to $1 million, a reduction of 50% or $1 million.
   •
Reduced the short-term performance-based incentive compensation target from $4.4 million to $1.5 million, a reduction of 66% or $2.9 million.
   •
Adjusted the pay mix, increasing the weighting of long-term performance-based incentive compensation from 44% to 72% of total direct compensation.
   •
Decreased total direct compensation at target from $11.4 million to $9.0 million, a reduction of 21% or $2.4 million.
   •
Actual direct CEO compensation for fiscal 2018 was $3.9 million or 57% ($5.1 million) below the reduced target.
   •
Over the three-year period from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2018, CEO compensation decreased 83% while total shareholder return decreased 66%.
2019 Compensation Actions
   The Compensation Committee further adjusted Mr. Wexner’s target compensation for fiscal 2019 by reducing the amount of fixed compensation and long-term performance-based incentive compensation at target:
   •
Reduced base salary from $1 million to $900,000, a reduction of 10%.
   •
Reduced long-term performance-based incentive compensation target from $6.5 million to $5.1 million.
   •
Decreased total direct compensation at target from $9.0 million to $7.5 million, a reduction of 17% or $1.5 million.

include in the Company’s proxy materials director nominees constituting up to 20% of the Board.

The Company has a majority voting standard for the election of directors in uncontested elections, and a director who does not obtain a majority vote is required to submit a letter of resignation.

17

The Chair of the Board is an independent director.
The Company does not have a shareholder rights plan or poison pill.
We understand that action by stockholder written consent is a topic of interest to certain stockholders and a topic about which perspectives vary. However, the Board believes that stockholder action by written consent is unnecessary given the Company’s current corporate governance practices, while creating the risk that it could be used by small groups of self-interested stockholders to exclude other stockholders from critical decisions affecting the Company.
The Board Recommends a Vote AGAINST the Stockholder Proposal Regarding Stockholder Action by Written Consent.
21

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Fiscal 2018 Overview

Financial

COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Executive Summary
This past fiscal year has been like no other when it comes to change and a challenging environment. We have been preparing to operate Bath & Body Works and Victoria’s Secret as separate, standalone companies. We implemented cost reduction and performance in 2018 was below our expectations. Operating income declinedimprovements at Victoria’s Secret, which includes Victoria’s Secret Lingerie, PINK and Victoria’s Secret Beauty, referred to collectively as VS NewCo, while growth across our brands was mixed:continuing to drive strong growth at Bath & Body Works was more than offset by declinesWorks. This work has been done in the midst of a global pandemic that has forced us, and most critically, our executive leadership, to be creative and agile, adopt new ways of working and implement best-in-class safety measures.
To navigate our business transformation, and manage this crisis, our Board prioritized establishing a leadership team that will address the challenges facing the business and position our brands for success, resulting in changes at Victoria’s Secretthe most senior executive levels. In May 2020, our founder, Leslie H. Wexner stepped down as CEO and our international segment.

AtChairman of the Board of L Brands, remaining a member of the Board as Chairman Emeritus. Andrew M. Meslow, previously CEO of Bath & Body Works, an aligned, experienced leadership teamwas named CEO of L Brands and strong customer response to our merchandise assortments, driven by a close connection to our customer and a fast and agile supply chain, resulted in another record year, on top of a record 2017. In 2018, Bath & Body Works’ comparable sales increased 11% and operating income increased 13%. Sales in the digital channel increased 30%. We ended the year with more than 600 newly remodeled stores, which include the White Barn store design. These stores present a new, compelling store experience for the brand and customers alike, driving sales growth.

Victoria’s Secret underperformed in 2018 due to a poor assortment which reduced traffic, and resulted in increased promotion that negatively impacted margin rates. Our team is working hard to improve the assortment. Victoria’s Secret segment comparable sales declined 2% for the year, and operating income declined 50%.

In Victoria’s Secret Lingerie (“VSL”), we are seeing better performance in our newer bra launches. However, growth in new styles has not been enough to offset the declines in older sub-brands. We made a substantial investment in sleepwear for the Holiday season, and the category delivered strong growth over last year. VSL comparable sales declined in the low-single digit range in 2018. John Mehas joined the business in mid-February 2019 asBoard. Stuart B. Burgdoerfer, current CFO of L Brands, took on the newadded role of interim CEO for Victoria’s Secret Lingerie. John is an experiencedVS NewCo.

At the end of June 2020, Charles C. McGuigan stepped down from his role as Chief Operating Officer of L Brands and talented fashion merchant leader, and he is focused on getting close to our customers and improving the merchandise assortment.

PINK comparable sales declined in the mid-single digit range in 2018,CEO of Mast Global. In September 2020, Julie B. Rosen was hired as fashion errors in apparel drove a deceleration in performance. Amy Hauk moved fromPresident at Bath & Body Works to join PINKlead the development of products across all categories. In October 2020, Shelley M. Milano left her role as Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer, allowing for separate human resources leadership teams for each of Bath & Body Works and VS NewCo going forward. Deon N. Riley joined L Brands in December 2020 to fill the Chief Human Resources Officer role for L Brands and Bath & Body Works.

Following these changes, at the end of fiscal 2020, our NEOs are as follows:
Andrew M. Meslow, CEO lateof L Brands.
Stuart B. Burgdoerfer, CFO of L Brands and interim CEO of VS NewCo.
James L. Bersani, President, Real Estate.
Julie B. Rosen, President, Bath & Body Works.
Deon N. Riley, Chief Human Resources Officer, L Brands and Bath & Body Works.
In addition the following former executive officers who departed in 2018. She has been getting2020 are also treated as NEOs under the Commission’s rules:
Leslie H. Wexner, former CEO.
Charles C. McGuigan, former Chief Operating Officer of L Brands and CEO of Mast Global.
Shelley M. Milano, former Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer.
Fiscal 2020 Overview
Even without the disruption caused by the COVID-19 global pandemic, L Brands faced significant uncertainty and change in 2020. The fiscal year began with an agreement to really knowsell 55% of the PINK customerVS NewCo business to Sycamore Partners, positioning both Bath & Body Works and plans to bring fresh merchandise ideas in 2019.

Victoria’s Secret Beauty improved sourcing speed and fashion, resulting in comparable sales increasingVS NewCo for long-term success as separate companies. When Sycamore Partners terminated the agreement in the low-double digit rangemidst of an extremely challenging business environment created by the pandemic, our efforts became entirely focused on navigating those challenges.

We took decisive actions to manage the L Brands business in 2018.the best interests of our stockholders, associates, partners, customers and communities. Our actions included expanding the scope of our Compensation Committee, renamed the HCC Committee, to include oversight of the Company’s programs, policies, practices and strategies relating to culture, talent, diversity, inclusion and equal employment opportunities in addition to oversight of the Company’s executive compensation plans. We also implemented compensation-related actions to preserve cash and retain key leaders and associates who are needed to help navigate the pandemic and execute on our plan to operate as separate businesses, including:
22

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Outside North America, we

Suspended cash compensation for the Board for the first quarter of 2020.
Designed a competitive compensation package for our new CEO to ensure appropriate performance incentive along with long-term retention (see “—CEO Compensation” for details).
Temporarily reduced base compensation by 20% for leaders at the Senior Vice President level and above.
Eliminated the 2020 annual merit increase for all associates.
Suspended annual equity awards which, according to our normal practice, would have opened 74 net new storesbeen granted to eligible leaders in 2018, ending the year with 753 stores. RevenueMarch 2020.
Implemented a broad-based cash retention program for full-time, salaried associates in our international segment increased by 20% in 2018, but operating income declined, as growth inhome office, distribution centers and call center, including our franchise businesses was offset by underperformance inNEOs. The NEO retention program is designed to ensure business continuity and leadership stability for strategically important leaders who are critical to navigating the United KingdomCOVID-19 crisis and executing on our investment in China.

Our franchise business – in Victoria’s Secret Full Assortment (“VSFA”), PINK, Victoria’s Secret Beauty and Accessories (“VSBA”)plan to operate VS NewCo and Bath & Body Works stores – continues to grow atas separate, standalone companies during a high profit rate.

We are investing in China and have a strong leadership team with considerable experience to draw upon as we grow. China is an extremely important market and we have received positive responses to the Victoria’s Secret brand and experienced rapid online growth.

In the United Kingdom, we continue to face challenges, influenced by the same issues as our North American business, as well as macro issues specific to the United Kingdom. We are focused on making the necessary changes to improve the business.

We also made some tough decisions that will enable us to increase our focus on our core businesses and our highest growth opportunities. Theseperiod of significant decisions included:

Closing Henri Bendel;uncertainty.
Selling the La Senza business; and
Resetting our dividend and committing to deleverage.

These were the right choices that we believe will strengthen our company and help us deliver positive results.

We are equipped for success—strong brands which lead their categories and an experienced and talented leadership team—with significant growth opportunities both in and outside of North America. Although our performance in 2018 did not meet our expectations, we continue to hold leadership positions in the segments of retail in which we do business.

18

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Pay for Performance

At L Brands, we recognize that

As a specialty retailer, our business is the ultimate change business.constantly changing to enable growth. Our focus is on speed and agility, responding toin support of deliberate change. Our compensation program reflects this philosophy, rewardingincreasing compensation when performance is strong performance and significantly reducingdecreasing compensation when performance does not meet our high expectations.

The CompensationHCC Committee monitorsoversees our compensation program, ensuring that pay is aligned with performance. OverStrong performance in fiscal 2020 is reflected in the last three years, CEO compensation has decreased significantly following performance that was challenged by changes intended to simplifyshort-term cash incentive payments for fiscal 2020.

We remained focused on successfully managing the business through the COVID-19 pandemic, with associate and accelerate growth.

customer safety our top priority, while consistently delivering a great experience in stores and online. Even with significant challenges in the retail environment, performance in fiscal 2020 exceeded our initial expectations, driven by exceptionally strong results at Bath & Body Works and better-than-expected performance at VS NewCo.

The following chart illustrates how CEO compensation has aligned with performance. In years of positive performance, CEO pay increased, while in years of decreasing total shareholder return, CEO pay decreased significantly:


The significant decrease in CEO compensation for fiscal 2018 resulted in CEO compensation that was significantly belowpandemic had a material impact on our business, especially during the 25th percentilefirst quarter, when nearly all of our peer group (discussed below understores around the heading “Compensation Comparison”):


world were closed for a significant period. Notwithstanding the disruption to our business, our leadership team reacted quickly and creatively, enabling progress in several areas. With focus on our direct channels we were able to maximize online sales to help offset the decline resulting from store closures. Direct sales increased 109% at Bath & Body Works and 31% at VS NewCo. Due to good product acceptance and disciplined inventory management, we were also able to meaningfully pull back on promotional activity and achieve increased merchandise margin rates in both businesses. We also implemented a profit improvement plan for VS NewCo, taking action to decrease expenses, close unprofitable stores and improve our international business. This plan is expected to yield an annual benefit of approximately $400 million. As a result, we achieved the following results during fiscal 2020:
Adjusted earnings per share of $3.46 compared to $2.29 last year(1).
Comparable sales increased 21%; total sales decreased 8%, due to store closures.
Gross profit rate increased by 450 basis points(1); driven by a significant increase in the merchandise margin rate and buying and occupancy expense leverage.
Adjusted operating income increased $577 million to $1,808 million compared to $1,231 million last year(1); and the operating income rate increased by 580 basis points to 15.3%(1).
Total stockholder return increased 77.6%.
(1)
Earnings per share and operating income determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for L Brands were $3.00 and $1,580 million for fiscal 2020 and $(1.33) and $258 million for fiscal 2019. Gross profit rate increased 490 basis points and operating income rate was 13.3% for fiscal 2020 calculated according to GAAP. The reconciliation of the adjusted measure to the comparable GAAP figure is on pages 30 through 32 of the 2020 10-K.

These results were achieved through the work of our NEOs to provide a safe and engaging shopping experience for our customers, execute on our profit improvement plan, leverage speed in our supply chain, and increase fulfillment capacity and productivity in our direct channel.

19

23

TABLE OF CONTENTS

While these charts show how

Governance Practices
We have continued the following compensation paid to Mr. Wexner,practices in accordance with our CEO,corporate governance principles:
No tax gross-ups for NEOs upon a change in control.
“No hedging” policy governing stock trading.
Adopted a policy that discourages pledging of Company stock and requires advance approval by the Company aligns with performance, it is also important to note that Mr. Wexner is the beneficial owner of 17.35%our General Counsel. None of the Company’s stock held by our NEOs or Board members is pledged.
No re-pricing of stock options without stockholder approval.
No single-trigger vesting of equity awards upon a change in control.
Clawback policy as described under the heading “—Compensation Governance—Recovery of Compensation.”
Stock ownership guidelines set at five times base salary for our CEO and three times base salary for other NEOs. Members of our Board must maintain ownership of at least the number of shares of Common Stock. Accordingly, his personal wealth is tied directlyStock received as Board compensation over the previous four years.
Stock plan that requires a vesting period of at least one year, subject to our stock price performance, which provides direct alignment with stockholder interests.

certain exceptions.

Stockholder Advisory Vote

In 2018, 98.5%

At our 2020 annual meeting, 90.9% of our stockholders voted in favor of our executive compensation program. The CompensationHCC Committee considers this vote and other stockholder feedback when making compensation decisions for NEOs. We have a policy of robust engagement with stockholders, with continuing outreach to and dialogue with our major investors on a range of issues, including executive compensation matters. As indicated by the high-level support for our executive compensation program in 2018,2020, the feedback from stockholders in 20182020 regarding executive compensation was generally positive.

In addition, the Company reviewed its long-term compensation practices in light of the following feedback it received from proxy advisory firms:

Performance requirement in which 100% of the award is earned if performance is achievedindicated understanding and none of the award is earned if performance is not achieved.
Achievement of only one performance metric is required to earn awards under the long-term equity incentive program.
A portion of long-term equity incentive awards are eligible to vest after two years.
   In response to this feedback, effective for awards granted in March 2019, the Compensation Committee reviewed and redesigned the long-term performance-based equity incentive program as follows:
   •
Long-term equity incentives will be granted as a mix of 50% performance-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”), 30% time-vested RSUs and 20% stock options.
   •
Performance-based RSUs will be subject to achievement of two metrics – revenue growth and operating income as a percent of sales relative to our peer group, each weighted equally at 50%.
   •
Performance will be evaluated based on a scale, and payout will be interpolated between threshold, target and maximum:
   •
Payout at threshold performance is 50% and is set at the 30th percentile of our peer group.
   •
Payout at target performance is 100% and is set at the 50th percentile of our peer group.
   •
Payout at maximum performance is 150% and is set at the 80th percentile of our peer group.
   •
The performance period for both metrics is three years, and 100% of both time-vested and performance-based RSUs vest after three years.

We continue the following compensation practices in accordance with our corporate governance principles and in response to stockholder and advisory group feedback:

No tax gross-ups for NEOs upon a change in control.
“No hedging” policy governing stock trading.
Adopted a policy that discourages pledging of Company stock and requires advance approval by our General Counsel.
None of the Company’s stock held by our NEOs or Board members is pledged.
No re-pricing of stock options without stockholder approval.
Double trigger vesting of equity awards upon a change in control.
Clawback policy as described under “—Compensation Governance—Recovery of Compensation.”
Stock ownership guidelines set at five times base salarysupport for our CEOcompensation outcomes. Notwithstanding the challenging environment in 2020 and three times base salary for other NEOs. Membersthe compensation-related actions that were taken, we believe that our compensation program continues to reflect the feedback of our Board must maintain ownership of at least the number of shares of Common Stock received as Board compensation over the previous four years.stockholders.

24

20


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Stock plan that requires a vesting period of at least one year:
Three year minimum vesting period for RSUs that are based on the passage of time; and
One year minimum vesting period for stock options and for RSUs that are earned based on performance.
While these are the minimum requirements under the plan, stock options and performance-based RSUs awarded to our NEOs in fiscal 2018 generally vest over five years.

Conclusion

Executive Summary

   We are committed to aligning our executive compensation with our Company’s performance. Over the last several years, the Company implemented a series of initiatives designed to better position several of our businesses for the future. The short-term effects of some of these initiatives have not produced the results that are expected. In response, the Compensation Committee reduced our CEO’s target and actual compensation each year since 2016. These actions by the Compensation Committee (summarized below), resulted in CEO compensation that decreased 83% from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2018 while total shareholder return decreased 66% during this same period.
   The Board reviews the Company’s short- and long-term strategy with our CEO and management team regularly. As we have done in the past, we will continue to calibrate our CEO’s compensation to the results of the business, and to the returns of our stakeholders.
2017 Compensation Actions
   •
Did not grant a Fall 2017 long-term performance-based equity incentive award. As a result, CEO long-term performance-based equity awards for fiscal 2017 were 70% ($3.5 million) below target.
   •
Exercised negative discretion to eliminate the Fall season short-term incentive payout, resulting in a total 2017 payout that was 75% ($3.3 million) below target.
   •
As a result of these actions, CEO compensation was 60% ($6.8 million) below the reduced target for fiscal 2017.
   •
CEO total compensation decreased by 61% ($9.1 million) from fiscal 2016 to fiscal 2017, while total shareholder return decreased by 15% during the same period.
2018 Compensation Actions
   The Compensation Committee adjusted Mr. Wexner’s target compensation for fiscal 2018 to reduce the amount of fixed compensation and put greater emphasis on performance-based compensation:
   •
Adjusted base salary from $2 million to $1 million, a reduction of 50% or $1 million.
   •
Reduced the short-term performance-based incentive compensation target from $4.4 million to $1.5 million, a reduction of 66% or $2.9 million.
   •
Adjusted the pay mix, increasing the weighting of long-term performance-based incentive compensation from 44% to 72% of total direct compensation.
   •
Decreased total direct compensation at target from $11.4 million to $9.0 million, a reduction of 21% or $2.4 million.
   •
Actual direct CEO compensation for fiscal 2018 was $3.9 million or 57% ($5.1 million) below the reduced target.
   •
Over the three-year period from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2018, CEO compensation decreased 83% while total shareholder return decreased 66%.

21

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2019 Compensation Actions
   The Compensation Committee further adjusted Mr. Wexner’s target compensation for fiscal 2019 by reducing the amount of fixed compensation and long-term performance-based incentive compensation at target:
   •
Reduced base salary from $1 million to $900,000, a reduction of 10%.
   •
Reduced long-term performance-based incentive compensation target from $6.5 million to $5.1 million.
   •
Decreased total direct compensation at target from $9.0 million to $7.5 million, a reduction of 17% or $1.5 million.
With these actions to reduce CEO pay, Mr. Wexner’s total compensation for fiscal 2018 was $4.6 million, which is well below the median of our peers. In addition, 2019 target pay is 39% below the median. In summary, there is alignment between our performance, our stockholders’ interests and our CEO’s pay. Accordingly, we recommend stockholders vote FOR the executive compensation program as outlined in Proposal 3.

Executive Compensation Philosophy

Guiding Principles

The CompensationHCC Committee has builtoversees an executive compensation program based on the following clear and purposeful guiding principles:

Compensation Component
Our Principles
Pay Level
Attract and retain superior leaders in a highly competitive market for talent.
Pay competitively and equitably.
Recognize depth and scope of accountability and complexity of responsibility.
Pay Mix
Emphasize performance-contingent, long-term and equity-based compensation over fixed compensation.
Pay for Performance
Recognize and reward enterprise, brand and individual performance.
Align executives’ interests with stockholders’ interests.
Require executives to own a significant amount of Common Stock.
Set Spring and Fall goals that reflect the seasonal nature of our business and incentivize goal achievement in each season.
Create long-term stockholder value through regular achievement of short-term goals while pursuing our longer-term strategy of growth in North America and internationally and increasing operating margins.internationally.
Retain and incentivize high-performers through long-term equity incentive awards.

Connecting Pay and Performance

Two key elements of our program’s design connect pay to performance. First, our incentive goals are designed to challenge our NEOs to achieve a high level of performance to earn incentives at target.target levels. When our NEOs hit and exceed, or fall short of, these goals, we compensate them accordingly.

Second, to further connect NEOs’our CEO’s pay to performance and stockholder interests, we employ a pay mix philosophy that places greater emphasis on performance-based and equitylong-term, equity-based, compensation over base salary. The following charts illustratechart illustrates our pay mix philosophy which consists of a lower percentage of base salary compared to performance-based pay at target.


25

22


TABLE OF CONTENTS


To assess whether the Company’s compensation program reflects our financial results as designed, the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, Willis Towers Watson, analyzed our performance-based long-term equity and short-term total cash compensation for our NEOs across four key measures (total shareholder return, operating income, earnings per share and return on invested capital). The analysis tested the alignment of pay delivered over multiple timeframes relative to our peer group with performance measured by these specific metrics that are important to our Company and its stockholders. The analysis demonstrated that pay and performance are appropriately correlated over time.

Based on this analysis, Willis Towers Watson and the Compensation Committee concluded that our NEO compensation is aligned with performance and appropriate based on the competitive market, achievement of performance goals and total returns delivered to our stockholders. They also concluded that the executive compensation program’s design appropriately responds to changes in our business and results.

Compensation Comparison

We compare our NEO compensation with publicly available data on executive compensation.

compensation, including the executive compensation paid by our peer companies, in order to appropriately establish incentives for our NEOs and retain top talent.

We define our peer group, with the help of Willis Towers Watson, the HCC Committee’s independent compensation consultant, to generally include:

Businesses that are similar to ours in total revenue, market capitalization, global footprint, business and/or merchandise focus;
Retailers that compete with us for executive talent;
Specialty and department store retailers;
and
Companies with brands that have emotional content;content.
Businesses that are generally similar to the Company in total revenue, market capitalization, global locations, business and/or merchandise focus; and
Retailers that compete with the Company for executive talent.

We review our peer group annually and did not make any changes in 2018.fiscal 2020. Our peer group consists of the following companies:

Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
J. C. Penney Company, Inc.
Ross Stores, Inc.
American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.
Kohl’s Corporation
Starbucks Corporation
Avon Products, Inc.
Macy’s, Inc.
Tapestry Inc.
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.
NIKE, Inc.
The TJX Companies, Inc.
The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
Nordstrom, Inc.
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
The Gap, Inc.
Ralph Lauren Corporation
 

23

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We do not specifically set our NEOs’ compensation against our peer group. Instead, we consider peer group comparisons provided by Willis Towers Watson as one of several factors in applying our pay philosophy and setting the pay of our NEOs. OurThis peer group used for compensation comparisons differs from the peer group used to evaluate performance under performance stock units (“PSUs”) granted to our CEO. A description of the performance peer group is used by Willis Towers Watson,included under the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, to analyze the effectiveness of our compensation program at delivering pay for performance on a relative basis.

heading “—CEO Compensation.”

Stock Ownership Guidelines

The CompensationHCC Committee encourages Common Stock ownership by our NEOs through stock ownership guidelines which promote a long-term focus on performance, discourage inappropriate risk-taking and align the interests of our NEOs with those of our stockholders. Stock ownership guidelines can be met through direct or beneficial ownership of Common Stock including Common Stock heldand indirect ownership through grants of stock under our stock incentive and retirement plans.

Our CEO is required to achieve and maintain ownership of Common Stock with a value of five times his base salary. As the beneficial owner of 47,741,096 shares of Common Stock (17.35% of shares outstanding), Mr. Wexner’s stock ownership well exceeds this minimum requirement.

Othersalary and our other NEOs are required to achieve and maintain beneficial ownership of Common Stock with a value of three times the NEO’s base salarysalary. Our NEOs are required to maintain these ownership levels within five years of becoming subject to the ownership guideline. All of our NEOs are either in compliance with this guideline.

guideline or will be required to comply within the required time frame.

Members of our Board must maintain ownership of at least the number of shares of Common Stock received as Board compensation over the previous four years. All members of our Board are in compliance with this policy.

Compensation for NEOs

Compensation Setting Process

The CompensationHCC Committee makes all decisions regarding Mr. Wexner’sCEO compensation and Mr. Wexner makes recommendations onwith advisory input from its independent compensation consultant, Willis Towers Watson. Our CEO, with oversight from the HCC Committee, sets compensation for the other NEOs. The CompensationHCC Committee oversees the evaluation process and compensation structure for the otherall NEOs and approves all NEOgrants of stock awards.awards to our NEOs. In making compensation decisions for our NEOs, the HCC Committee takes into consideration input, recommendations and market-based analyses provided by both management and Willis Towers Watson.
26

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Target compensation for the NEOs is reviewed annually and is designed to reward historical performance, incentivize future performance and be competitive with the external market for talent.

Compensation Components

The three principal elements of our executive compensation programs arehave historically been base salary, short-term performance-based cash incentive compensation and long-term performance-based equity incentive compensation. Each NEO’s base salary is set considering similar criteriathe factors below and all our NEOs, including our CEO, participate in the same short-term performance-based cash incentive compensation. The sizecompensation program.
In fiscal 2020, due to the significant uncertainty surrounding the separation of Bath & Body Works and VS NewCo, the COVID-19 pandemic and constraints on shares available for grant timingunder the 2015 Stock Option and Performance Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”), we determined that it was not appropriate to grant long-term equity incentives (which are generally granted annually).
Instead, to ensure long-term retention of long-term performance-based equity incentive compensationour ongoing leadership during particularly turbulent times for our CEO is different frombusiness, special cash retention awards were approved by the otherHCC Committee for our NEOs, but the other key terms of the awardwhich are the same, including vesting and performance requirements. Otherdiscussed below.
In addition to these three principal elements of compensation, that may be paid tothe Company also provides our NEOs include retirement and other post-employment benefits and perquisites. Our CEO is not eligible for post-employment benefits under a severance or change in control agreement. Additional information about each of these compensation componentscomponent is provided below.

Base Salary

The following factors are considered in determining base salary adjustments:

Scope and responsibility of the NEO’s position;
Achievement of seasonal and annual business goals;
Level of overall compensation paid by competitors for comparable positions;
Recruitment, retention and development of leadership talent;
The Company’s challenging expectations for future growth; and
The appropriate balancing of our NEOs’ base salary against their incentive compensation.

24

TABLE OF CONTENTS

As previously discussed, Mr. Wexner’sMeslow and Mr. Burgdoerfer received base salary decreased significantlyadjustments in fiscal 2018. Minimal or no changes were made to the2020 in connection with their promotions and increased scope of responsibility. Mr. Bersani’s base salary did not change from fiscal 2019. Ms. Rosen and Ms. Riley’s base salaries reflect the terms of their offer of employment.

NEO
2020 Base
Salary ($)
Mr. Meslow
1,275,000
Mr. Burgdoerfer
1,200,000
Mr. Bersani
800,000
Ms. Rosen
850,000
Ms. Riley
750,000
The table reflects base salaries in effect at the other NEOs. Inend of fiscal 2020 and does not reflect the fact Mr.that Messrs. Meslow, Burgdoerfer and Mr. McGuigan have not received aBersani’s base salary increase since 2016.

NEO
2018 Base
Salary ($)
2017 Base
Salary ($)
Increase
(%)
Mr. Wexner
 
1,000,000
 
 
2,000,000
 
 
-50.0
%
Mr. Burgdoerfer
 
900,000
 
 
900,000
 
 
0.0
%
Mr. McGuigan
 
1,300,000
 
 
1,300,000
 
 
0.0
%
Mr. Bersani
 
770,000
 
 
 
*
 
 
*
Ms. Milano
 
900,000
 
 
 
*
 
 
*
Mr. Coe
 
1,130,000
 
 
1,100,000
 
 
2.7
%
Mr. Waters
 
925,000
 
 
900,000
 
 
2.8
%
pay was reduced 20% for approximately three months along with leaders at the Senior Vice President level and above to conserve cash during store closures.
*Fiscal 2017 information is not required to be disclosed for Mr. Bersani and Ms. Milano because they were not NEOs until fiscal 2018.

Short-Term Performance-Based Cash Incentive Compensation

Short-term performance-based incentive compensation is paid pursuant to the 2015 Incentive Compensation Performance Plan (the “2015 ICPP”). This programcompensation component focuses on achievement of six-month goals, reflecting the seasonal nature of our business and the fact that achievement of our short-term goals season after season creates long-term value for our stockholders.

Our operations consist of two principal selling seasons: Spring (the first and second quarters) and Fall (the third and fourth quarters). The Fall including theseason, which includes holiday season,sales, is weighted more heavily because of its importance to our profitability. The use of two six-month performance periods in our plan design reflects our belief that achievement of our short-term

27

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Short-term performance-based cash incentive compensation

goals season after season creates long-term value for our stockholders. This structure proved to be beneficial during the COVID-19 crisis because it allowed for our HCC Committee to establish meaningful targets are set atfor the Fall season with a percentage of base salary with the amount earned ranging from zero to double the target incentive, based on the extent to which financial goals are achieved or exceeded.

The financial incentive provided by the short-term performance-based incentive compensation plan is a key component in driving the performancemore clear understanding of the Company. For fiscal 2018, our NEOs’ focus on maximizing operating income was especially important given strategic initiatives that were expectedchallenges of the retail environment, avoiding the need to put pressure on operating income.

make retroactive adjustment to performance goals.

The pre-established, objective financial goals for fiscal 20182020 were based solely on adjusted operating income, subject to adjustment for extraordinary items pursuant to the 2015 Incentive Compensation Performance Plan (the “2015 ICPP”) and approved by the Compensation Committee. Operatingincome. Adjusted operating income is used because it is a performance measure over which executives can have significant impact and is also directly linked to the Company’s long-term growth plan and performance that drives stockholder value. When evaluatingWhile the 2015 ICPP provides for adjustment due to extraordinary items, both Spring and Fall payouts reflect the actual, quantitative results, without retroactive adjustment for the impact of the COVID-19 crisis. Adjusted operating income goals, the Compensation Committee compares the increase in operating income relative to the change in the incentive payments to associates at target.

Operating income goals are set at the beginning of each six-month season based on:

An analysis of historical performance;
Income goals for that brand;
FinancialOverall economic environment including financial results of other comparable businesses; and
Progress toward achieving our strategic plan.

25

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Performance goals for the Fall season were simplified to reflect the intended separation of Bath & Body Works and VS NewCo and the integration of international and sourcing functions into the brands which they support. The table below shows the weighting ofadjusted operating income goals used to determine short-term performance incentive payouts:

NEO
Short-Term Performance Incentive Goal Weighting and Metric
Mr. Wexner
Mr. Burgdoerfer
Mr. McGuigan
Mr. Bersani
Ms. Milano
}
80% weighted average of major brand performance:
   55% Victoria’s Secret operating income
   30% Bath & Body Works operating income
   15% Other operating income
20% Total L Brands operating income
Mr. Coe
100% Bath & Body Works operating income
Mr. Waters
90% weighted average of international brand operating income
10% international home office expense

In fiscal 2018, the Compensation Committee set goals at target that were lower than actual results in fiscal 2017 due to the following items that were expected to reduce operating income in fiscal 2018:

In addition to regular merit increases, the Company increased wages $1 to $2 per hour for most hourly store associates.
Our retail fiscal calendar included an extra week of sales and earnings in fiscal 2017.
Increased costs related to our investment in full assortment stores and development of the direct channel in China for L Brands International.
Investment in direct channel fulfillment capabilities.

The table below shows the operating income goalseach season required to earn short-term performance-based incentive compensation at target and actual performance by season:

performance:
 
Fiscal 20182020 Spring Season
Fiscal 20182020 Fall Season
 
Adjusted
Operating Income
Goal (target)
Actual
Performance(1)
Adjusted
Operating Income
Goal (target)
Actual
Performance(1)
Bath & Body Works(2)
$345 million
$400 million
$870 million
$1,408 million
VS NewCo(2)
65 million
(242) million
40 million
518 million
Other(3)
(52) million
(173) million
N/A
N/A
Total L Brands
$462358 million
$383(15) million
$1,080 millionN/A
$1,071 million
Victoria’s Secret
332 million
196 million
475 million
332 million
Bath & Body Works
252 million
293 million
686 million
793 million
L Brands International(2)
-12 million
-14 million
2 million
-2 million
Other(2)
68 million
91 million
180 million
196 millionN/A
(1)
(1)ActualThe adjusted operating income goal target and the actual performance presentscolumns present operating income on an adjusted basis which removes certain special items which are not indicative of our ongoing operations due to their size and nature. The Company uses adjusted financial information as key performance measures of results for purposes of evaluating performance internally, which may not correspond to amounts reported externally.
(2)
Fiscal 2020 Spring season operating income goals and performance for Bath & Body Works and VS NewCo reflect North America operations and fiscal 2020 Fall season operating income goals and performance reflect total segment, including international operations.
(2)
L Brands International and Other includeincludes business unit operating income that is an internal performance measure and does not correspond to amounts reported externally.
Fall season goals for VS NewCo were set below prior year actual results to provide meaningful incentive in a challenging environment and to reflect the projected decline in store sales due to decreased store traffic and store closures, partially offset by projected growth in online sales and margin rates. Fall season goals for Bath & Body Works were set slightly below prior year actual results to account for capacity constraints on store traffic due to social distancing and the cost of investment in fulfillment of online sales and implementation of safety measures for our workforce and customers. When evaluating operating income goals, the HCC Committee compares the change in adjusted operating income relative to the change in the incentive payments to associates to ascertain the reasonableness of the potential payout.

To earn

Adjusted operating income goal ranges at threshold, payout,target and maximum were significantly widened in fiscal 2020 due to the challenging and uncertain environment. We felt the widened ranges were necessary to provide meaningful and realistic incentives to participants in a year filled with uncertainty due to both the challenges created by the pandemic and uncertainty around the future division of the Company.
28

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The table below shows the range of performance goals average approximately 60% to 90%as a percent of target. To earntarget for threshold and maximum payout, performance goals average approximately 110% to 145% of target. Performance below threshold results in no payout. payout:
 
Fiscal 2020
Spring Season
Fiscal 2020
Fall Season
 
Threshold
Maximum
Threshold
Maximum
Bath & Body Works
87%
107%
89%
111%
VS NewCo
-154%
177%
-313%
488%
Performance between threshold and target and target and maximum is interpolated to determine payout percentage beginning at 20% atfor threshold performance up to 200% at maximum.

maximum performance.
Short-term performance-based cash incentive compensation targets are set as a percentage of base salary with the amount earned ranging from zero to double the target incentive, based on the extent to which financial goals are achieved or exceeded.
The financial incentive provided by the short-term performance-based incentive compensation plan is a key component in driving the performance of the Company. The table below shows the target percent of base salary and the performance goal weighting for each NEO:
NEO
Fiscal
2020
Target
Fiscal 2020 Spring Performance Goal
Fiscal 2020 Fall Performance Goal
Mr. Meslow
185%
3% VS NewCo;
94% Bath & Body Works;
1% Other;
2% Total L Brands*
13% VS NewCo;
87% Bath & Body Works
Mr. Burgdoerfer
180%
48% VS NewCo;
24% Bath & Body Works;
10% Other;
18% Total L Brands*
87% VS NewCo;
13% Bath & Body Works
Mr. Bersani
140%
40% VS NewCo;
28% Bath & Body Works;
12% Other;
20% Total L Brands
50% VS NewCo;
50% Bath & Body Works
Ms. Rosen
115%
N/A
100% Bath & Body Works
Ms. Riley
80%
N/A
100% Bath & Body Works
*
Spring payouts for Mr. Meslow and Mr. Burgdoerfer were pro-rated based on the number of days each NEO served in each of their roles during the season.

26

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Payouts for fiscal 20182020 performance are set forth below and in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the 20182020 Summary Compensation Table below.

Both Spring and Fall payouts reflect the actual, quantitative results originally set at the beginning of each season without adjustment for the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on results.

Total Fiscal 20182020 Incentive Payout
 
Fiscal 2020 Target
Incentive
($)
Fiscal 2020
Spring Incentive
Payout
($)
Fiscal 2020
Fall Incentive
Payout
($)
Total Fiscal 2020
Payout
($)
Percent of Fiscal
2020 Target
(%)
Mr. Meslow
2,304,808
1,658,928
2,830,500
4,489,428
195%
Mr. Burgdoerfer
2,052,000
417,636
2,592,000
3,009,636
147%
Mr. Bersani
1,120,000
250,880
1,344,000
1,594,880
142%
Ms. Rosen
402,816
N/A
805,632
805,632
200%
Ms. Riley
360,000
N/A
720,000
720,000
200%
29

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
Fiscal 2018 Target
Incentive
($)
Fiscal 2018
Spring Incentive
Payout
($)
Fiscal 2018
Fall Incentive
Payout
($)
Total Fiscal 2018
Payout
($)
Percent of Fiscal
2018 Target
(%)
Mr. Wexner
 
1,500,000
 
 
504,600
 
 
879,300
 
 
1,383,900
 
 
92
%
Mr. Burgdoerfer
 
1,530,000
 
 
514,692
 
 
896,886
 
 
1,411,578
 
 
92
%
Mr. McGuigan
 
2,210,000
 
 
743,444
 
 
1,295,502
 
 
2,038,946
 
 
92
%
Mr. Bersani
 
1,001,000
 
 
336,736
 
 
586,786
 
 
923,523
 
 
92
%
Ms. Milano
 
1,080,000
 
 
363,312
 
 
633,096
 
 
996,408
 
 
92
%
Mr. Coe
 
2,034,000
 
 
1,627,200
 
 
2,440,800
 
 
4,068,000
 
 
200
%
Mr. Waters
 
1,572,500
 
 
662,966
 
 
1,003,884
 
 
1,666,850
 
 
106
%
The pandemic had a material impact on our business. Our NEOs reacted quickly and creatively, enabling us to maximize online sales to help offset the decline resulting from store closures. In addition, their leadership resulted in good product acceptance and smart inventory management that allowed us to pull back on promotional activity and achieve better merchandise margin rates in both businesses. This resulted in adjusted operating income that significantly exceeded expectations and goals set at the beginning of each season.

Long-Term Performance-Based Equity Incentive Compensation

Stock awards are made

In fiscal 2020, due to the significant uncertainty surrounding the separation of Bath & Body Works and VS NewCo and the COVID-19 pandemic, our HCC Committee decided not to grant annual long-term incentive compensation to our NEOs at the time of our normal grant cycle (March 2020). Accordingly, long-term equity incentives were only awarded as promotional awards for Mr. Meslow and hiring incentives for Ms. Rosen and Ms. Riley. We did not grant annual equity awards to NEOs or other leaders who were otherwise eligible according to our normal practice.
Stock awards made prior to May 2020 were made under the 2015 Plan and after May 2020 under the 2020 Stock Option and Performance Incentive Plan (the “2015“2020 Plan”). Our equity-based long-term performance-based incentive program rewards past performance, reflected by the size, which was approved at our 2020 stockholder meeting.
Time-Vested Restricted Stock Units
Time-vested restricted stock units (“RSUs”) are granted to ensure market competitiveness of the award at grant,executive compensation package and encourages future performanceto retain executives over the long-term.
In connection with his promotion to CEO of Bath & Body Works in February 2020, Mr. Meslow was granted RSUs with a challenginggrant date value of $1,274,555 that cliff vest 100% after three years. Ms. Rosen and Ms. Riley each received RSUs as a hiring incentive and to make up for forfeited stock awards from their prior employers. Ms. Rosen’s RSUs have a grant date value of $849,986 and cliff vest 100% after three years from the grant date. Ms. Riley’s RSUs have a grant date value of $749,996 and vest 50% on each of the first and second anniversaries of her hire date.
Performance Stock Units
PSUs incentivize executive performance requirement. In addition, the vesting requirements increase the likelihood of retaining executives who are critical to our success.

For the NEOs other than Mr. Wexner, individual performance (including contribution tothrough the achievement of business goals, executiongrowth and profitability metrics. Since we did not grant annual equity awards in fiscal 2020, Mr. Meslow is the only NEO who received a PSU award in fiscal 2020. Mr. Meslow’s PSUs were granted in connection with his promotion to CEO of retail fundamentalsL Brands and accomplishment of talent and cultural objectives), company performance, competitive practice, the Company’s overall equity compensation expense budget, stockholder dilution, internal equity and retention risk are all considered in determining the size of their equity awards. The size and timing of Mr. Wexner’s equity award is determined on a different basis, as described in detail below.

Stock Options

Stock options are intended to align executive interests with stockholder interests by creating a direct link between compensation and stockholder return, and to foster retention. Stock options granted to each NEO vest over five years, subject to continued employment. The exercise price is equal tobelow under the grant date closing price of Common Stock.

Performance-Based RSUs

Performance-based RSUs are intended to:

Incentivize achievement of key performance metrics (through the performance requirement);heading “CEO Compensation.”
Align executive rewards with those realized by stockholders (through the market value of our stock);
Retain superior executive talent (through the time vesting requirements); and
Reward exceptional individual performance (through annual determination of the size of the award).

27

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Below is a summary of the RSU awardslong-term equity incentive compensation, including RSUs, PSUs and stock options awarded in fiscal 2018:

 
Value of
RSU Award
($)
Value of Stock
Option Award
($)
Total Fiscal
2018 Equity
Award Value
($)
Mr. Wexner(1)
 
952,729
 
 
244,137
 
 
1,196,866
 
Mr. Burgdoerfer
 
1,748,530
 
 
117,737
 
 
1,866,267
 
Mr. McGuigan
 
2,059,168
 
 
169,926
 
 
2,229,094
 
Mr. Bersani(2)
 
1,775,448
 
 
98,009
 
 
1,873,457
 
Ms. Milano(2)
 
1,357,942
 
 
114,894
 
 
1,472,836
 
Mr. Coe
 
1,547,959
 
 
143,828
 
 
1,691,787
 
Mr. Waters
 
1,252,154
 
 
117,737
 
 
1,369,891
 
2020.
 
Target Value of
PSU Award
($)
Value of Time-
Vested
RSU Award
($)
Total Fiscal
2020 Equity
Award
Value
($)
Mr. Meslow
11,056,000
1,274,555
12,330,555
Mr. Burgdoerfer
Mr. Bersani
Ms. Rosen
849,986
849,986
Ms. Riley
749,996
749,996
Cash Retention Awards and Other Bonuses
(1)While the performance requirement is the same, the amountTo ensure long-term retention of our ongoing leadership during a time of transition and significant uncertainty and in the absence of a long-term equity incentive award in fiscal 2020, special cash retention awards were granted to Messrs. Meslow, Burgdoerfer and timing of Mr. Wexner’s equity award are determined on a different basis than that of our other NEOs, as described in detail below.
(2)RSUs awarded to Mr. Bersani and Ms. Milano in March 2018 are not subject to the performance requirement because they were not NEOs at that time.

In order for performance-based RSUs to be earned, the Company’s cumulative adjusted operating income, as a percentage of cumulative sales, must bepaid in the top one-thirdthree equal installments. The first of the S&P Retailing Index (also determinedretention payments was paid on a cumulativeJanuary 31, 2021 and adjusted basis) beginning with the fiscal year of the award through the fiscal year immediately preceding each vest date.

We use operating income in our short-term performance-based cash incentive program and as a component of our long-term performance-based equity incentive program because operating income is an important focus for our NEOs and an appropriate metric for measuring performance. However, while operating income is a component of both incentive programs, thereremaining two installments are notable differences in the performance metrics used in the two programs, as detailed below:

Operating income is the sole performance metric used for our short-term program while the long-term program is based on a metric that uses both operating income and sales;
The use of operating income as a percentage of sales for our long-term program requires strong performance in both operating income and sales and measures the efficiency of our sales;
The relative metric of the long-term program requires that our performance significantly exceeds that of companies within our industry for the pre-determined performance goalscheduled to be achieved;made on July 31, 2021 and
The cumulative performance metric of January 31, 2022 if the long-term program requires sustained performance over the five-year vesting period reflecting long-term performance of the Company.

Performance-based RSUs vest over five years, with 20% vestingexecutive is employed on each of those dates. In addition, under the second and third anniversariesterms of the grant date, and 30% onMs. Riley’s offer of employment, she will receive cash retention payments of $250,000 within 30 days of each of the fourthfirst and fifthsecond anniversaries of her hire date, subject to her continued employment.

30

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Total Cash
Retention Amount
($)
Mr. Meslow
6,000,000
Mr. Burgdoerfer
4,500,000
Mr. Bersani
2,250,000
Ms. Rosen
N/A
Ms. Riley
500,000
Cash retention amounts are not disclosed in the 2020 Summary Compensation Table and will be disclosed in the table in the year in which the payment is earned and paid based on the executive’s continued service.
In connection with their offers of employment, Ms. Rosen also received in September 2020 a sign-on bonus of $1,000,000 and Ms. Riley will receive a sign-on bonus of $1,500,000 that will be payable in July 2021, in each case subject to the performance measure being satisfied andher continued employment. ToIn the extentevent either executive voluntarily resigns for any reason or is terminated by the performance metricCompany for cause within two years of her hire date, she will be required to reimburse the full amount of the sign-on bonus.
The sign-on bonus amount for Ms. Riley is not met for any vesting tranche,disclosed in the shares from such vesting tranche2020 Summary Compensation Table and will be forfeited.

Equity awards are granted ondisclosed in the datetable in the awardyear in which the amount is approved, unlesspaid.

In recognition of his extraordinary efforts leading the effective date ofReal Estate team during the reasonCOVID-19 pandemic, and generating significant occupancy savings for the award (such as hire date) is later thanCompany, the approval date. In this case, the grant date is the later date.

HCC Committee also approved a $250,000 bonus to Mr. Bersani.

Retirement and Other Post-Employment Benefits

Retirement and other post-employment benefits consist of qualified and non-qualified defined contribution retirement plan benefits and termination benefits.

Qualified Defined Contribution Retirement Plan

The qualified plan is available to all associates who meet certain age and service requirements. Associates can contribute up to the amounts allowable under Section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The Company matches associates’ contributions according to a predetermined formula and contributes additional amounts

28

TABLE OF CONTENTS

based on a percentage of the associates’ eligible annual compensation and years of service. Associates’ contributions and Company matching contributions to the qualified plan vest immediately. Additional Company contributions and the related investment earnings are subject to vesting based on years of service.

Non-Qualified Defined Contribution Deferred Compensation and Supplemental Retirement Plan

The Company previously sponsored a non-qualified supplemental retirement plan is available to all(the “SRP”) for associates who meetmet certain age, service, job level and compensation requirements. The non-qualified plan is an unfunded plan which provides benefits beyond the Code limits for qualified defined contribution plans. The Company doeshas not set aside assets to fund liabilities of the non-qualified plan. Assets that may be used to satisfy such liabilities are general assets of the Company, subject to the claims of the Company’s creditors.

Associates can contribute

On June 27, 2020 (the “Termination Date”), the HCC Committee authorized the termination of the SRP. Any remaining benefits and obligations under the SRP are expected to be paid out in full approximately one year following the non-qualified plan upTermination Date. Pursuant to a maximum percentageapplicable rules under the Code, certain other deferred compensation arrangements were simultaneously terminated and liquidated, including any remaining elective deferred stock units and deferral elections under the Company’s Stock Award and Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Associate Directors. In addition, any retirement-eligible associates of the Company who were eligible compensation. The Company matches associates’ contributions and contributes additional amounts basedfor special pro rata vesting on any RSUs held by such associate will no longer receive pro rata vesting treatment on a percentage ofretirement following the associates’ eligible compensation and years of service.

The plan also permits participating associates to defer additional compensation which the Company does not match.

Associates’ contributions to the non-qualified plan and the related interest accruals vest immediately. Company contributions and credits to the non-qualified plan and the related interest are subject to vesting based on years of service.

Termination Date.

Termination Benefits: Severance and Change in Control Agreements

We have entered into severance and change in control agreements with our NEOs other than Mr. Wexner.NEOs. See “Retirement and Other Post-Employment Benefits—Estimated Post-Employment Payments and Benefits” below for a description of estimated benefits in certain termination situations, including a change in control.
31

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Mr. McGuigan and Ms. Milano, whose positions were eliminated in connection with the planned separation of VS NewCo from L Brands, received severance benefits in fiscal 2020 according to their individual agreements. In addition, as a component of our senior management transition, Ms. Milano was asked to continue with the Company for a period of four months and assist in the transition. In exchange, in September 2020, Ms. Milano received a retention bonus of $1,500,100 as an enhancement of her existing severance protection benefit in recognition of her performance of expanded duties. Mr. Wexner was not covered by a severance agreement.
Upon a change in control, equity awards will only vest if the executive’s employment is terminated by the executive for good reason or by the Company other than for cause within 24 months of the change in control. None of our NEOs is entitled to a tax gross-up uponfor any excise taxes on compensation paid in connection with a change in control.

Limited Perquisites

We provide our NEOs with minimallimited perquisites that the CompensationHCC Committee has determined are reasonable and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. These perquisites may include the reimbursement of financial planning costs of up to $9,500 per year and supplemental disability and life insurance coverage provided by the Company for associates at the Vice President level and above, including the NEOs. In addition, to the extent that corporate provided aircraft is used by any NEO for personal purposes, the NEO has reimbursed the Company based on the greater of the amount established by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”(the “IRS”) as reasonable for personal use or the aggregate incremental cost associated with the personal use of the corporate owned aircraft as determined by an independent, third partythird-party aircraft costing service.

CEO Compensation

Overview of CEO Pay

The HCC Committee determined that Mr. Wexner’sMeslow’s track record of success at Bath & Body Works and the challenges facing the business make his leadership critical to the future of the Company. While his past successes speak for themselves, the challenges ahead are vast including replacing the leadership of our iconic founder, implementing a profit improvement plan at VS NewCo, separating the Victoria’s Secret and Bath & Body Works businesses, continuing to drive strong growth at Bath & Body Works and navigating a global pandemic that has forced us to be creative and agile, adopt new ways of working and implement best-in-class safety measures. With this in mind, Mr. Meslow’s compensation reflectsis designed to provide significant performance incentives while retaining his leadership over the long term.
CEO Compensation
Mr. Meslow’s compensation includes substantially the same compensation components as the other NEOs. He participates in the short-term, performance-based incentive compensation plan, cash retention program and retirement plan described above.
Mr. Meslow received two long-term equity incentive awards in fiscal 2020. Mr. Meslow first received a time- vested RSU award for 64,048 shares in February 2020 when he was promoted to CEO of Bath & Body Works that cliff vests 100% after three years. In connection with his promotion to CEO of L Brands, Mr. Meslow was awarded PSUs enabling Mr. Meslow to earn from zero to a maximum of 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock over a five-year performance period depending on the Company’s performance. Total compensation decreased 20%achievement of specified operating income margin targets as well as revenue growth measures and stockholder return measures relative to the performance of peers. A five-year performance period (vs. our usual three-year performance period) was used to drive longer-term performance and retention as well as recognize the overall magnitude of the award. As noted below, maximum payout will only occur through extraordinary performance, reflecting revenue growth that significantly exceeds our peer group and meaningful improvement in operating income rate. The RSU award granted in February 2020 will be deducted from fiscal 2017any shares earned under the PSU award.
The PSUs incentivize the CEO through the achievement of challenging profitability, growth and return metrics. Two metrics weighted equally at 50% determine the initial payout: revenue growth relative to 2018 while adjusted operating income(1) decreased 17%. Over the three-year period from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2018, CEO compensation decreased 83% while total shareholder return decreased 66%.

(1)Operating income determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for L Brands decreased 28%. The reconciliation of the adjusted measure to the comparable GAAP figure is on pages 23 to 24 of the Company’s 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “2018 10-K”).

CEO Stock Award Determination Overview

In fiscal 2018, the Compensation Committee transitioned to granting Mr. Wexner one annual stock award from the historical practice of granting one in the Spring,peers and one in the Fall.

cumulative

32

29


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Mr. Wexner’s fiscal 2018 stock grant was granted near

operating income as a percent of cumulative sales (operating income margin). Payout is then adjusted up or down 20% based on total stockholder return relative to peers. These metrics were chosen by the endHCC Committee because they align with the strategic direction of the Fall season when Mr. Wexner’sCompany and the Company’s performance was substantially determined for the fiscal year. This stock award is intended to recognize financial, strategicprovide a balance between growth and operational performance for the fiscal year and incentivize future performance. The stock award was grantedprofitability metrics as well as alignment with stockholders.
Performance will be evaluated based on three separate three-year periods over a target valuetotal of $1.5 million (77% below target) as a combination of stock options and performance-based RSUs.

Mr. Wexner’s stock award is subject to performance in two ways:

five years:
The Compensation Committee goes through a rigorous quantitative and qualitative evaluation of historical performance to determine the size40% of the award; and
Once granted, RSUs mustaward may be earned based on the attainment of a quantitativefiscal 2020 through 2022 performance metric and the value of stock options is contingent on the stock price increasing.vests in 2023

The rigorous quantitative and qualitative evaluation that is used to determine the size30% of the award relative to target includes an analysis of:

Absolute and relative total shareholder return over one and three years
Absolute and relative return on invested capital over one and three years
Sales and operating income growth
Earnings per share
Performance against pre-established financial targets
Leadership talent development
Success in fostering a high-performance culture

While the size of Mr. Wexner’s stock award is determined on a quantitative and qualitative basis, once the size of the grant is determined, the Compensation Committee imposes a quantitative performance metric that the Company must achieve over the vesting period in order for Mr. Wexner to vest in the RSUs. The performance-based RSUs and stock options vest over five years, with 20% vesting on each of the second and third anniversaries of the grant date, and 30% on each of the fourth and fifth anniversaries. Performance-based RSUs mustmay be earned based on fiscal 2021 through 2023 performance and vests in 2024

30% of the award may be earned based on fiscal 2022 through 2024 performance and vests in 2025
The specific targets are as follows:
 
# Shares Earned
3-Year Revenue Growth
Relative to Peer Group
3-Year Cumulative Operating
Income Rate
Threshold
500,000
30th percentile
16%
Target
1,000,000
50th percentile
18%
Maximum
1,500,000
90th percentile
22%
Performance will be evaluated based on a scale, and payout will be interpolated between threshold, target and maximum.
Once performance is determined based on the above two metrics, the award will be adjusted up 20% if total stockholder return is above the 75th percentile and down 20% if total stockholder return is below the 40th percentile of the designated peer group. There is no adjustment for total stockholder return performance between the 40th and 75th percentile and the adjustment may not cause the number of shares earned under the award to be above maximum or below threshold.
The peer group used to determine relative revenue growth performance achievement and total stockholder return adjustment for the PSUs was selected, with the help of adjusted operating income,Willis Towers Watson, based on companies that are generally similar to Bath & Body Works in total revenue, market capitalization, business and/or merchandise focus. Due to the long-term nature of the award and the fact that it is expected that VS NewCo will be separated from L Brands and Bath & Body Works will be the remaining brand, the HCC Committee determined that it was appropriate to select companies based on Bath & Body Works as a percentage of cumulative sales, instandalone company. Accordingly, the top one-third ofcompanies that comprised the S&P Retailing Index (also determined on a cumulative and adjusted basis).

peer group are as follows:

Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
Hanesbrands Inc.
Sally Beauty Holdings Inc.
American Eagle Outfitters Inc.
lululemon athletica inc.
Tapestry Inc.
Big Lots, Inc.
Michael’s Co. Inc.
The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
Burlington Stores Inc.
Newell Brands Inc.
Tractor Supply Company
Coty Inc.
Nu Skin Enterprises Inc.
Ulta Beauty Inc.
Designer Brands Inc.
Ralph Lauren Corporation
Williams Sonoma Inc.
Foot Locker Inc.
Revlon Inc.
CEO Termination Benefits

Due

Mr. Meslow is entitled to his unique role as the founder of theseverance protections similar to those covering other Company Mr. Wexner is not covered by a severance or change in control agreement. However, all of Mr. Wexner’s unvested stock options will vest upon death and all conditions applicable to the RSUs, including the performance condition will be deemed to have been satisfied. Subject to the achievement of pre-established performance conditions, RSUs will continue to vest upon Mr. Wexner’s total disability. Upon retirement, RSUs will vest pro rata based on the fraction of whole months worked from the grant date over the full vesting period (i.e., one-fifth will vest if 12 full months are completed from the grant date for a grant that would otherwise vest over five years), subject to the achievement of performance conditions.executives. In the event of a termination of his employment by the Company without cause or his resignation for good reason absent a change in control, unvested RSU awardshe is entitled to receive cash severance of two years’ base salary and one year of incentive compensation based on actual results. In the event of a termination of his employment by the Company without cause or his resignation for good reason within two years following a change in control, he is entitled to receive cash severance of two years’ base salary and two years’ incentive compensation (at average historical levels), plus a pro rata payment of any unpaid retention payments. In addition, upon a termination of employment by the Company without cause or a resignation for good reason (whether or not in connection with a change in control), the Company will vest ifprovide, at its expense, medical and dental benefits for a period of up to 18 months following the termination date.
33

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CEO Perquisites
The Board has approved Mr. Wexner’s employment is terminated other thanMeslow’s use of corporate provided aircraft for cause within 24 monthspersonal purposes to promote the efficient and effective use of his time while travelling. In fiscal 2020, to the extent that corporate provided aircraft was used by Mr. Meslow for personal purposes, he has reimbursed the Company based on the aggregate incremental cost associated with the personal use of the changecorporate owned aircraft, resulting in control.

CEO Perquisites

Theno disclosure of a personal benefit in the All Other Compensation column of the 2020 Summary Compensation Table. In the future, the Board has approved reimbursement based on the IRS’s Standard Industrial Fare Level (“SIFL”) formula. To the extent that corporate aircraft is used by Mr. Meslow for personal purposes in the future, the difference between the reimbursement amount and the aggregate incremental cost to the Company of Directors hasproviding this benefit will be disclosed in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table.

In addition, the Board approved a security program (the “Security Program”) that providesprovided security services to Mr. Wexner and his family.family during his tenure as our CEO. The Security Program iswas for the benefit of the Company and iswas appropriate given the risks associated with Mr. Wexner’s position. We periodically hire a third party to review our Security Program toposition as the CEO and Chairman of the Board of L Brands. To verify that a bona fide Company oriented security concern existsexisted and that the Security Program costs arewere reasonable and consistent with these concerns.concerns, the Security Program was reviewed by a third party. The Security Program requiresrequired Mr. Wexner to use corporate provided aircraft, or private aircraft that iswas in compliance with the Security Program, whether the purpose of the travel iswas business or personal.

The Security Program expired in connection with Mr. Wexner stepping down as CEO and Chairman of the Board of L Brands, and the associates who served as members of Mr. Wexner’s security team terminated employment with L Brands effective June 30, 2020.

30

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The cost of security services which arewere not business related have been reimbursed to the Company by Mr. Wexner. In addition, to the extent that corporate provided aircraft iswas used by Mr. Wexner during his tenure as CEO for personal purposes, he has reimbursed the Company as noted above under the heading “—Compensation for NEOs—Perquisites”.

Limited Perquisites.”

Compensation Governance

Human Capital and Compensation Committee

Our programs, policies, practices and strategies relating to culture, talent, diversity and inclusion and executive compensation program isare overseen by the CompensationHCC Committee. All of our CompensationHCC Committee members are appointed by our Board and meet independence and other NYSE requirements. CompensationHCC Committee members are selected based on their knowledge and experience in human capital and compensation matters from both their professional experience and their roles on other boards.

As part of its self-evaluation process, the CompensationHCC Committee considers prevailing best practices and compliance with the highest governance standards. During fiscal 2018,2020, the CompensationHCC Committee also continued to engage with the full Board to maximize its effectiveness. The role of the CompensationHCC Committee and information about its meetings are set forth in this proxy statement.

The CompensationHCC Committee participated in the preparation of this CD&A and recommended to the Board that it be included in this proxy statement.

The CompensationHCC Committee, together with the Company, also evaluates the Company’s compensation structure from the perspective of enterprise risk. The Company’s compensation structure includes risk mitigating factors such as a mix of pay that is balanced between long- and short-term, and fixed and variable payouts under the 2015 Plan, 2020 Plan and 2015 ICPP. Based on this evaluation, the CompensationHCC Committee believes that the Company’s compensation structures are appropriate and do not incentivize inappropriate taking of business risks.

The CompensationHCC Committee is governed by a charter which is available on our website at www.lb.com.

Committee Meetings and Delegation

Members of Company management, including the Chief Human Resources Officer, Chief Operating Officerour CEO and the Chief Financial Officer,CFO, attend the CompensationHCC Committee meetings along with the Senior Vice President of Total Rewards,Chief Human Resources Officer, who generally prepares meeting materials, and the Corporate Secretary, who records the minutes of the meeting. Members of Company management, including the CEO, do not play a role in recommending CEO compensation. The CompensationHCC Committee regularly meets in executive session without management present.
34

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The CompensationHCC Committee may delegate its authority to subcommittees or the Chair of the CompensationHCC Committee. In accordance with its charter, the CompensationHCC Committee has delegated to our Chief Operating Officer, or his designee,Vice President, Compensation, the authority to make stock awards under the provisions of the 2015 Plan and 2020 Plan with a value up to $400,000 in any year to any associate who is not a Section 16 officer of the Company or a senior leadership team member.

Independent Compensation Consultant

As permitted by its charter, the CompensationHCC Committee retained Willis Towers Watson as its independent executive compensation consultant and has the sole authority to retain and terminate any independent executive compensation consultant.

The CompensationHCC Committee, considering recommendations from our management team, determines the work to be performed by the consultant. The consultant works with management to gather data required in preparing analyses for CompensationHCC Committee review. Specifically, the services the consultant provides include:

Assisting in evaluation of and providing recommendations for CEO and other NEO compensation;
Informing the CompensationHCC Committee of changing market practices;
Consulting on our executive compensation strategy and program design;
Analyzing alignmentthe competitiveness of pay and performance;
executive pay;
Assisting in the selection of our peer group; and
Assisting in the preparation and review of this disclosure.

31

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In addition to the services provided at the request of the CompensationHCC Committee, a separate division of Willis Towers Watson provides a call center tracking system for which we pay quarterly software usage fees.fees and provides compensation survey reports. For fiscal 2018,2020, these fees totaled $136,985.$128,304. The fees paid to Willis Towers Watson for its services to the CompensationHCC Committee in fiscal 20182020 were $93,869.$250,616. Total fees paid to Willis Towers Watson for the fiscal year were $230,854.$378,920. The CompensationHCC Committee, in its sole discretion, engaged Willis Towers Watson; such engagement was not made or recommended by management. The CompensationHCC Committee did not participate in management’s decision to engage Willis Towers Watson for its call center tracking system. The CompensationHCC Committee has determined that the provision of this work by Willis Towers Watson is not material and does not impair the independence and objectivity of advice provided to the CompensationHCC Committee on executive compensation matters.

The CompensationHCC Committee reviews and approves the provision of additional services by Willis Towers Watson to the Company and evaluates the performance and independence of Willis Towers Watson, specifically considering independence factors identified by the Commission.NYSE listing rules. This evaluation includes a review of written representations from Willis Towers Watson confirming their independence. Based on its evaluation, the CompensationHCC Committee believes that there are no conflicts of interest that could impair Willis Towers Watson’s ability to provide independent, objective advice to the CompensationHCC Committee regarding executive compensation matters.

In addition to consulting provided by Willis Tower Watson, the HCC Committee engaged David Kollat, who served as the Chair of the HCC Committee until May 2019, as an advisor to the HCC Committee until May 2020. Dr. Kollat’s services included consulting related to CEO compensation and establishment of short-term, performance-based incentive compensation goals for the fiscal 2020 Spring season.
Tax Deductibility

Section 162(m) of the Code (“Section 162(m)”) generally does not allow a tax deduction to public companies for compensation paid to certain executive officers that is more than $1 million during the tax year. Section 162(m) of the Code provided an exemption from this deduction limitation for compensation that qualified as “performance-based compensation.” However, as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, this exemption was repealed, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, subject to transition relief for certain arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017. The Company intends to administer grandfathered compensation in accordance with the transition relief to the extent reasonably practicable. Going forward, non-grandfathered annual compensation in excess of $1 million for our covered senior executives will generally not be deductible. The CompensationHCC Committee continues to have the flexibility to pay non-deductible compensation if it believes it is in the best interests of the Company.
35

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Recovery of Compensation

Under the 2015 ICPP, and the 2015 Plan and the Compensation2020 Plan, the HCC Committee has the power and authority to recover previously awarded bonuses or equity-based compensation or profits if (i) required by applicable law with respect to a participant, (ii) a participant engaged in fraudulent conduct or activities (or had knowledge of such conduct or activities) relating to the Company or (iii) a participant should have had knowledge of such conduct or activities based on his or her position, duties or responsibilities.

Tally Sheets

To assess the reasonableness of the compensation of our NEOs, the CompensationHCC Committee annually reviews a three-year history of all of the components of the NEOs’ compensation, including salary, short-term incentive compensation, realized and unrealized gains on stock options and RSUs, the cost to the Company of all perquisites, benefits earned and accrued under the Company’s non-qualified deferred compensation and supplemental executive retirement plan, and potential payouts under several potential severance and change-in-control scenarios. Based on this review, the CompensationHCC Committee concluded that compensation components individually and in aggregate are reasonable, encourage retention, incentivize performance and are in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Conclusion

32

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Conclusion

We are committed to aligning our executive compensation with our Company’s performance. OverIn connection with the last several years,Company’s strong performance in fiscal 2020, our NEOs earned above-target short-term performance incentive payments according to the payout formulas established at the beginning of each six-month performance period without retroactive adjustment for the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on results. Long-term equity incentives were granted only to our CEO as a one-time incentive in connection with his promotion and to Ms. Rosen and Ms. Riley as hiring incentives in connection with their employment offers, and we did not otherwise grant annual equity awards to our NEOs during fiscal 2020. Substantially all of the long-term incentive to our CEO is subject to challenging performance requirements that will only be earned if the Company implementedachieves rigorous growth, profitability and return metrics that provide incentive for a seriesbalance of initiatives designed to better position severalgrowth and profitability, support the strategic direction of our businesses for the future. The short-term effects of some of these initiatives have not produced the results that are expected. In response, the Compensation Committee reduced our CEO’s targetCompany, and actual compensation each year since 2016. These actions by the Compensation Committee (summarized below), resulted in CEO compensation that decreased 83% from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2018 while total shareholder return decreased 66% during this same period.alignment with stockholders.
   The Board reviews the Company’s short-In summary, there is alignment between our performance, our stockholders’ interests and long-term strategy with our CEO and management team regularly. AsNEOs’ pay. Accordingly, we have donerecommend stockholders vote FOR our executive compensation program as outlined in the past, we will continue to calibrate our CEO’s compensation to the results of the business, and to the returns of our stakeholders.
Proposal 3.
2017 Compensation Actions
   •
Did not grant a Fall 2017 long-term performance-based equity incentive award. As a result, CEO long-term performance-based equity awards for fiscal 2017 were 70% ($3.5 million) below target.
   •
Exercised negative discretion to eliminate the Fall season short-term incentive payout, resulting in a total 2017 payout that was 75% ($3.3 million) below target.
   •
As a result of these actions, CEO compensation was 60% ($6.8 million) below the reduced target for fiscal 2017.
   •
CEO total compensation decreased by 61% ($9.1 million) from fiscal 2016 to fiscal 2017, while total shareholder return decreased by 15% during the same period.
2018 Compensation Actions
   The Compensation Committee adjusted Mr. Wexner’s target compensation for fiscal 2018 to reduce the amount of fixed compensation and put greater emphasis on performance-based compensation:
   •
Adjusted base salary from $2 million to $1 million, a reduction of 50% or $1 million.
   •
Reduced the short-term performance-based incentive compensation target from $4.4 million to $1.5 million, a reduction of 66% or $2.9 million.
   •
Adjusted the pay mix, increasing the weighting of long-term performance-based incentive compensation from 44% to 72% of total direct compensation.
   •
Decreased total direct compensation at target from $11.4 million to $9.0 million, a reduction of 21% or $2.4 million.
   •
Actual direct CEO compensation for fiscal 2018 was $3.9 million or 57% ($5.1 million) below the reduced target.
   •
Over the three-year period from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2018, CEO compensation decreased 83% while total shareholder return decreased 66%.
2019 Compensation Actions
   The Compensation Committee further adjusted Mr. Wexner’s target compensation for fiscal 2019 by reducing the amount of fixed compensation and long-term performance-based incentive compensation at target:
   •
Reduced base salary from $1 million to $900,000, a reduction of 10%.
   •
Reduced long-term performance-based incentive compensation target from $6.5 million to $5.1 million.
   •
Decreased total direct compensation at target from $9.0 million to $7.5 million, a reduction of 17% or $1.5 million.

With these actions to reduce CEO pay, Mr. Wexner’s total compensation for fiscal 2018 was $4.6 million, which is well below the median of our peers. In addition, 2019 target pay is 39% below the median. In summary, there is alignment between our performance, our stockholders’ interests and our CEO’s pay. Accordingly, we recommend stockholders vote FOR the executive compensation program as outlined in Proposal 3.

36

33


TABLE OF CONTENTS

20182020 Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information concerning total compensation earned by or paid to our CEO, Chief Financial OfficerCFO and our three other most highly compensated NEOs during the fiscal year ended February 2, 2019.

Name and Principal Position(1)
Year
Salary
($)
Bonus
($)(2)
Stock
Awards
($)(3)(4)
Option
Awards
($)(3)(4)
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compen-
sation($)(5)
Change
in
Pension
Value
and
Non-
qualified
Deferred
Compen-
sation
Earnings
($)(6)
All Other
Compen-
sation
($)(7)
Total ($)
Leslie H. Wexner
Chairman of the Board, CEO
2018
$
1,000,000
 
$
0
 
$
952,729
 
$
244,137
 
$
1,383,900
 
$
638,289
 
$
334,255
 
$
4,553,310
 
2017
 
2,000,000
 
 
0
 
 
920,767
 
 
253,420
 
 
1,112,320
 
 
601,942
 
 
807,128
 
 
5,695,577
 
2016
 
2,000,000
 
 
0
 
 
7,159,010
 
 
2,231,003
 
 
1,657,920
 
 
553,781
 
 
1,172,130
 
 
14,773,844
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Stuart B. Burgdoerfer
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
2018
 
900,000
 
 
0
 
 
1,748,530
 
 
117,737
 
 
1,411,578
 
 
79,008
 
 
260,080
 
 
4,516,933
 
2017
 
900,000
 
 
0
 
 
1,616,479
 
 
83,980
 
 
1,022,040
 
 
70,437
 
 
316,520
 
 
4,009,456
 
2016
 
890,923
 
 
0
 
 
2,426,441
 
 
90,705
 
 
956,448
 
 
60,403
 
 
388,959
 
 
4,813,879
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Charles C. McGuigan
Chief Operating Officer,
CEO/President, Mast Global
2018
 
1,300,000
 
 
0
 
 
2,059,168
 
 
169,926
 
 
2,038,946
 
 
123,879
 
 
369,008
 
 
6,060,927
 
2017
 
1,300,000
 
 
0
 
 
2,434,972
 
 
121,308
 
 
1,476,280
 
 
110,693
 
 
451,336
 
 
5,894,589
 
2016
 
1,290,385
 
 
0
 
 
3,154,443
 
 
117,924
 
 
1,381,536
 
 
95,421
 
 
530,468
 
 
6,570,177
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
James L. Bersani
President, Real Estate
2018
 
766,923
 
 
0
 
 
1,775,448
 
 
98,009
 
 
923,523
 
 
164,461
 
 
202,717
 
 
3,931,081
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Shelley M. Milano
Chief Human Resources Officer
2018
 
849,846
 
 
0
 
 
1,357,942
 
 
114,894
 
 
996,408
 
 
8,979
 
 
133,123
 
 
3,461,192
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Nicholas P. M. Coe
CEO/President,
Bath & Body Works
2018
 
1,125,385
 
 
0
 
 
1,547,959
 
 
143,828
 
 
4,068,000
 
 
59,567
 
 
513,218
 
 
7,457,957
 
2017
 
1,100,000
 
 
0
 
 
1,902,944
 
 
102,644
 
 
2,522,124
 
 
46,311
 
 
523,802
 
 
6,197,825
 
2016
 
1,080,769
 
 
0
 
 
2,426,441
 
 
90,705
 
 
2,503,556
 
 
32,365
 
 
560,907
 
 
6,694,743
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Martin P. Waters
CEO/President,
L Brands International
2018
 
921,154
 
 
0
 
 
1,252,154
 
 
117,737
 
 
1,666,850
 
 
48,872
 
 
337,196
 
 
4,343,963
 
2017
 
900,000
 
 
0
 
 
1,616,479
 
 
83,980
 
 
1,763,172
 
 
39,955
 
 
279,213
 
 
4,682,799
 
2016
 
890,385
 
 
0
 
 
2,426,441
 
 
90,705
 
 
1,094,688
 
 
32,295
 
 
294,972
 
 
4,829,486
 
January 30, 2021.
Name and Principal Position
Year
Salary
($)
Bonus
($)(1)
Stock
Awards
($)(2)(3)
Option
Awards
($)(2)(3)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(4)
Change in
Pension
Value and
Non-qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)(5)
All Other
Compensation
($)(6)
Total
($)
Andrew M. Meslow
Chief Executive Officer
2020
$1,183,462
$0
$12,330,555
$0
$4,489,428
$146,274
$345,220
$18,494,939
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Stuart B. Burgdoerfer
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer,
Interim Chief Executive Officer, VS NewCo
2020
1,068,462
0
0
0
3,009,636
100,128
241,317
4,419,543
2019
900,000
0
1,260,644
238,495
1,114,884
89,235
303,913
3,907,171
2018
900,000
0
1,748,530
117,737
1,411,578
79,008
260,080
4,516,933
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
James L. Bersani
President, Real Estate
2020
763,077
250,000
0
0
1,594,880
197,626
191,420
2,997,003
2019
794,231
0
1,120,586
211,995
770,784
180,374
233,514
3,311,484
2018
766,923
0
1,775,448
98,009
923,523
164,461
202,717
3,931,081
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Julie B. Rosen
President, Bath & Body Works
2020
277,885
1,000,000
849,986
0
805,632
0
870
2,934,373
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deon N. Riley
Chief Human Resources Officer,
L Brands and Bath & Body Works
2020
54,808
0
749,996
0
720,000
0
209
1,525,013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Leslie H. Wexner
Former Chief Executive Officer,
Chairman Emeritus
2020
318,461
0
0
0
188,308
637,061
410,379
1,554,209
2019
900,000
0
794,107
126,676
1,032,300
676,394
253,744
3,783,221
2018
1,000,000
0
952,729
244,137
1,383,900
638,289
334,255
4,553,310
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Charles C. McGuigan
Former Chief Operating Officer,
CEO/President, Mast Global
2020
575,000
0
0
0
3,332,160
156,266
1,073,439
5,136,865
2019
1,300,000
0
1,820,925
344,496
1,610,388
139,555
428,769
5,644,133
2018
1,300,000
0
2,059,168
169,926
2,038,946
123,879
369,008
6,060,927
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Shelley M. Milano
Former Chief Human Resources Officer, L Brands
2020
709,615
0
0
0
1,666,080
28,321
1,886,198
4,290,214
2019
900,000
0
1,260,644
238,495
805,194
18,876
191,411
3,414,620
2018
849,846
0
1,357,942
114,894
996,408
8,979
133,123
3,461,192
(1)Our Board regularly reviews our list of executive officers based on their roles and scope of authority. Messrs. Coe and Waters are included here since they were considered executive officers until May 2018.
(2)
Performance-based incentive compensation bonuses are disclosed in this table underin the Non-Equity“Non-Equity Incentive Plan CompensationCompensation” column. NoneThe bonus paid to Ms. Rosen was paid as a hiring incentive in connection with her employment offer. The bonus paid to Mr. Bersani was in recognition of our NEOs received a nonperformance-based award in fiscal 2018.his extraordinary efforts leading the Real Estate team during the COVID-19 pandemic, generating significant occupancy savings for the Company.
(3)(2)
The value of stock and option awards reflects the aggregate grant date fair value, excluding estimated forfeitures, computed in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718 Compensation—Stock Compensation, for each award. PSUs granted to Mr. Meslow in fiscal 2020 include a specified market condition which can adjust the number of shares which vest under the award. The market condition compares total stockholder return to that of a designated peer group over the performance period. The award was valued using a Monte Carlo simulation model, which requires certain assumptions, including the risk-free interest rate, expected volatility and the estimated dividend yield. Assuming maximum achievement of performance conditions, the value of Mr. Meslow’s PSUs at the grant date was $16,584,000. Stock options are valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. See Note 2119 to the Company’s financial statements filed in the 20182020 10-K for the related assumptions for stock options granted during fiscal 2018, 20172019 and 20162018 and for a discussion of our assumptions in determining the aggregate grant date fair value of these awards. Awards vest over time and, therefore, are not realizable on an annual basis, nor is the ultimate value determinable without reference to future performance.
(4)(3)
Stock and option awards were granted to each NEO under the Company’s 2015 Plan and 2020 Plan. Awards are long-term compensation and generally vest over three to five years and are not realizable on an annual basis.
37

34

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(5)(4)
Represents the aggregate of the non-equity performance-based incentive compensation for the applicable fiscal Spring and Fall selling seasons. Incentive compensation targets are set based on a percentage of base salary and are paid seasonally based on the achievement of adjusted operating income results. The following table illustrates the amount of the compensation which is paid in cash and voluntarily deferred:
 
Paid in Cash
($)
Deferred
Cash
($)
Total
($)
Mr. Wexner
$
1,345,014
 
$
38,886
 
$
1,383,900
 
Mr. Burgdoerfer
 
1,364,746
 
 
46,832
 
 
1,411,578
 
Mr. McGuigan
 
1,978,678
 
 
60,268
 
 
2,038,946
 
Mr. Bersani
 
886,621
 
 
36,902
 
 
923,523
 
Ms. Milano
 
767,250
 
 
229,158
 
 
996,408
 
Mr. Coe
 
3,944,052
 
 
123,948
 
 
4,068,000
 
Mr. Waters
 
1,612,986
 
 
53,864
 
 
1,666,850
 
 
Paid in Cash
($)
Deferred
Cash
($)
Total
($)
Mr. Meslow
$4,489,428
$0
$4,489,428
Mr. Burgdoerfer
3,002,098
7,538
3,009,636
Mr. Bersani
1,581,188
13,692
1,594,880
Ms. Rosen
795,286
10,346
805,632
Ms. Riley
709,154
10,846
720,000
Mr. Wexner
188,308
0
188,308
Mr. McGuigan
3,332,160
0
3,332,160
Ms. Milano
1,666,080
0
1,666,080
(6)(5)
The Company does not sponsor a defined benefit retirement plan (tax-qualified or non-qualified). For fiscal 2018,2020, the amounts shown represent the amount by which earnings on each NEO’s non-qualified plan balance at an annual effective rate of 5.00%4.23% exceed 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate at the time the rate was set in October 2017.2019.
(7)(6)
The following table details all other compensation paid to each NEO during our last fiscal year:
 
Financial
Planning
Services
Provided
to
Executive
($)
Incremental
Company
Cost to
Provide
Supplemental
Life and
Disability
Insurance
Coverage
($)
Company
Contributions to
the Executive’s
Qualified and
Non-Qualified
Retirement Plan
Account
($)
Total
($)
Mr. Wexner
$
0
 
$
1,558
 
$
332,697
 
$
334,255
 
Mr. Burgdoerfer
 
9,500
 
 
2,120
 
 
248,460
 
 
260,080
 
Mr. McGuigan
 
3,420
 
 
1,995
 
 
363,593
 
 
369,008
 
Mr. Bersani
 
9,500
 
 
1,558
 
 
191,659
 
 
202,717
 
Ms. Milano
 
0
 
 
1,558
 
 
131,565
 
 
133,123
 
Mr. Coe
 
0
 
 
2,120
 
 
511,098
 
 
513,218
 
Mr. Waters
 
3,100
 
 
2,120
 
 
331,976
 
 
337,196
 

35

 
Financial
Planning
Services
Provided
to
Executive
($)
Incremental
Company
Cost
to Provide
Supplemental
Life and
Disability
Insurance
Coverage
($)
Company
Contributions
to
the Executive’s
Qualified and
Non-Qualified
Retirement
Plan
Account
($)
Severance
Pay
($)
Retention
Bonus
($)
Board
of
Director
Retainer
Paid in
Stock
($)
Board of
Director
Retainer
Paid in
Cash
($)
Total
($)
Mr. Meslow
$0
$2,598
$342,622
$0
$0
$0
$0
$345,220
Mr. Burgdoerfer
0
2,664
238,653
0
0
0
0
241,317
Mr. Bersani
4,739
2,145
184,536
0
0
0
0
191,420
Ms. Rosen
0
870
0
0
0
0
0
870
Ms. Riley
0
209
0
0
0
0
0
209
Mr. Wexner
0
659
217,272
0
0
80,543
111,905
410,379
Mr. McGuigan
945
1,076
346,418
725,000
0
0
0
1,073,439
Ms. Milano
0
1,800
193,913
190,385
1,500,100
0
0
1,886,198
38

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal 2018

2020

The following table provides information relating to plan-based awards and opportunities granted to the NEOs during the fiscal year ended February 2, 2019.

 
 
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(1)
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(2)
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)(3)
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)(4)
Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards
($)(5)
Name
Grant
Date
Threshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
Threshold
(#)
Target
(#)
Maximum
(#)
Leslie H. Wexner
 
1/30/2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
40,894
 
$
27.51
 
$
244,137
 
 
 
1/30/2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
40,894
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
952,729
 
 
 
 
 
$
300,000
 
$
1,500,000
 
$
3,000,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Stuart B. Burgdoerfer
 
3/21/2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
17,599
 
 
39.42
 
 
117,737
 
 
 
3/21/2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
17,599
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
545,745
 
 
 
4/25/2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
44,416
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,202,785
 
 
 
 
 
 
306,000
 
 
1,530,000
 
 
3,060,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Charles C. McGuigan
 
3/21/2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
25,400
 
 
39.42
 
 
169,926
 
 
 
3/21/2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
25,400
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
787,654
 
 
 
4/25/2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
46,954
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,271,514
 
 
 
 
 
 
442,000
 
 
2,210,000
 
 
4,420,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
James L. Bersani
 
3/21/2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
14,650
 
 
39.42
 
 
98,009
 
 
 
3/21/2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
14,650
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
454,297
 
 
 
4/25/2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
48,787
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,321,152
 
 
 
 
 
 
200,200
 
 
1,001,000
 
 
2,002,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Shelley M. Milano
 
3/21/2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
13,794
 
 
39.42
 
 
92,282
 
 
 
5/16/2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3,839
 
 
34.19
 
 
22,612
 
 
 
3/21/2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
13,794
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
427,752
 
 
 
5/16/2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3,839
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
99,161
 
 
 
5/16/2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
32,173
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
831,029
 
 
 
 
 
 
216,000
 
 
1,080,000
 
 
2,160,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Nicholas P. M. Coe
 
3/21/2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
21,499
 
 
39.42
 
 
143,828
 
 
 
3/21/2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
21,499
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
666,684
 
 
 
3/29/2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
29,573
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
881,275
 
 
 
 
 
 
406,800
 
 
2,034,000
 
 
4,068,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Martin P. Waters
 
3/21/2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
17,599
 
 
39.42
 
 
117,737
 
 
 
3/21/2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
17,599
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
��
 
 
545,745
 
 
 
4/25/2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
26,086
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
706,409
 
 
 
 
 
 
314,500
 
 
1,572,500
 
 
3,145,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
January 30, 2021.
 
 
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(1)
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(2)
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)(3)
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Under-
lying
Options
(#)
Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards
($)(4)
Name
Grant
Date
Threshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
Threshold
(#)
Target
(#)
Maximum
(#)
Andrew M. Meslow
2/20/2020
 
 
 
 
 
 
64,048
 
 
$1,274,555
 
5/14/2020
 
 
 
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
 
 
 
11,056,000
 
 
$460,962
$2,304,808
$4,609,616
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Stuart B. Burgdoerfer
 
410,400
2,052,000
4,104,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
James L. Bersani
 
224,000
1,120,000
2,240,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Julie B. Rosen
9/8/2020
 
 
 
 
 
 
26,958
 
 
849,986
 
 
195,500
977,500
1,955,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deon N. Riley
12/29/2020
 
 
 
 
 
 
19,952
 
 
749,996
 
 
120,000
600,000
1,200,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Leslie H. Wexner
 
750,000
1,500,000
3,000,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Charles C. McGuigan
 
468,000
2,340,000
4,680,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Shelley M. Milano
 
234,000
1,170,000
2,340,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards represent the Threshold, Target and Maximum opportunities under the 2015 ICPP for the 2018fiscal 2020 Spring and Fall seasons. The actual amount earned under this plan is disclosed in the 20182020 Summary Compensation Table in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column.
(2)
Equity Incentive Plan Awards were granted pursuant to the 2020 Plan. Awards granted to Mr. Meslow will vest at the end of the three-year performance period, with the number of shares to be awarded determined based on the Company’s 2015 Plan.achievement of (i) revenue growth during the three year performance period relative to peers and (ii) cumulative operating income as a percentage of cumulative sales, in each case as set forth under the heading —Compensation for NEOs—“Long-Term Equity Compensation.”

Equity Incentive Plan Awards represent the Target payment of performance-based RSUs for fiscal 2018. No amount is disclosed for Threshold and Maximum since the number of performance-based RSUs earned does not fluctuate based on performance. Units are earned at target, or not at all.

Awards granted on March 21, 2018 and to Ms. Milano on May 16, 2018 are subject to the Company’s achievement of operating income as a percentage of sales ranking in the top one-third of the S&P Retailing Index in each of fiscal 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022 determined on a cumulative basis. If the performance condition is met, the RSUs will vest 20% on the second and third anniversaries of the grant date and 30% on the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant date, subject to continued employment.

In each case, the vesting of these awards is subject to continued employment. Dividends are not paid or accrued on stock awards or stock units until such shares vest.

(3)
All Other Stock Awards were granted pursuant to the Company’s 2015 Plan.Plan for grant dates prior to May 14, 2020 and to the 2020 Plan for grant dates from May 14, 2020 on. Grant dates were established on the date the grants were approved by the CompensationHCC Committee. Awards vest 20%100% on the second and third anniversariesanniversary of the grant, date and 30% on the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant date.subject to continued employment.

In each case, the vesting of these awards is subject to continued employment.

(4)Option Awards were granted pursuant to the Company’s 2015 Plan. Option grant dates were established on the date the grants were approved by the Compensation Committee and the exercise price is the closing price of Common Stock on the grant date.

Option Awards vest 20% on the second and third anniversaries of the grant date and 30% on the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant date.

In each case, the vesting of these awards is subject to continued employment.

(5)
The value of stock and option awards reflects the grant date fair value under ASC Topic 718 Compensation—Stock Compensation for each award. Options are valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions as set forth in the Company’s financial statements filed in the 2018 10-K: dividend yield of 5.8%, volatility of 36%, risk free interest rate of 2.5%RSUs and expected life of 2.9 years. RSUsPSUs are valued based on the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the date of grant, adjusted for anticipated dividend yields.
39

36


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End for Fiscal 2018

2020

The following table provides information relating to outstanding equity awards granted to the NEOs as of fiscal year end, February 2, 2019.

 
Option Awards
Restricted Stock Awards
Name
Grant
Date
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
Option
Expiration
Date
Grant
Date
Number
of Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)(21)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
($)(25)
Leslie H. Wexner
 
1/31/2013
 
 
161,559
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
45.03
 
 
1/31/2023
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/29/2013
 
 
55,129
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
41.88
 
 
3/29/2023
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1/30/2014
 
 
124,191
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
49.38
 
 
1/30/2024
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2014
 
 
29,808
 
 
12,777
(1) 
 
0
 
 
54.21
 
 
3/31/2024
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1/28/2015
 
 
87,176
 
 
37,363
(2) 
 
0
 
 
81.11
 
 
1/28/2025
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4/02/2015
 
 
10,528
 
 
15,797
(3) 
 
0
 
 
91.17
 
 
4/02/2025
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1/27/2016
 
 
52,336
 
 
78,505
(4) 
 
0
 
 
91.71
 
 
1/27/2026
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2016
 
 
5,466
 
 
21,866
(5) 
 
0
 
 
87.81
 
 
3/31/2026
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1/25/2017
 
 
18,917
 
 
75,667
(6) 
 
0
 
 
61.85
 
 
1/25/2027
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2017
 
 
0
 
 
23,885
(7) 
 
0
 
 
47.10
 
 
3/31/2027
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1/30/2019
 
 
0
 
 
40,894
(8) 
 
0
 
 
27.51
 
 
1/30/2029
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1/30/2014
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
37,257
(9) 
 
1,011,528
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2014
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
12,777
(10) 
 
346,896
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1/28/2015
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
74,725
(11) 
 
2,028,784
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4/02/2015
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
15,797
(12) 
 
428,889
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1/27/2016
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
104,673
(13) 
 
2,841,872
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2016
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
21,866
(14) 
 
593,662
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1/25/2017
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
94,584
(15) 
 
2,567,956
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2017
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
23,885
(16) 
 
648,478
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1/30/2019
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
40,894
(17) 
 
1,110,272
 
Stuart B. Burgdoerfer
 
3/31/2011
 
 
12,773
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
26.43
 
 
3/31/2021
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/30/2012
 
 
17,329
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
41.54
 
 
3/30/2022
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/29/2013
 
 
23,611
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
41.88
 
 
3/29/2023
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2014
 
 
15,957
 
 
6,840
(1) 
 
0
 
 
54.21
 
 
3/31/2024
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4/02/2015
 
 
5,610
 
 
8,420
(3) 
 
0
 
 
91.17
 
 
4/02/2025
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2016
 
 
1,708
 
 
6,833
(5) 
 
0
 
 
87.81
 
 
3/31/2026
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2017
 
 
0
 
 
14,331
(7) 
 
0
 
 
47.10
 
 
3/31/2027
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/21/2018
 
 
0
 
 
17,599
(18) 
 
0
 
 
39.42
 
 
3/21/2028
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2014
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
11,401
(10) 
 
309,537
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4/02/2015
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
19,647
(12) 
 
533,416
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2016
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
25,054
(14) 
 
680,216
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2017
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
41,932
(16) 
 
1,138,454
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/21/2018
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
17,599
(19) 
 
477,813
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4/25/2018
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
44,416
(20) 
 
1,205,894
 
January 30, 2021.
 
Option Awards
Restricted Stock Awards
Name
Grant
Date
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
Option
Expiration
Date
Grant
Date
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
($)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
($)
Andrew M. Meslow
3/29/2013
6,707
0
0
41.88
3/29/2023
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2014
7,117
0
0
54.21
3/31/2024
 
 
 
 
 
 
4/02/2015
5,757
0
0
91.17
4/02/2025
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2016
5,978
2,563(1)
0
87.81
3/31/2026
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2017
4,936
7,405(2)
0
47.10
3/31/2027
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/21/2018
10,174
5,087(3)
0
39.42
3/21/2028
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/28/2019
11,408
22,817(4)
0
27.94
3/28/2029
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2016
7,688(6)
313,363
0
0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2017
22,215(7)
905,483
0
0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/21/2018
34,287(8)
1,397,538
0
0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/28/2019
61,068(9)
2,489,132
0
0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2/20/2020
64,048(10)
2,610,596
0
0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5/14/2020
0
0
1,000,000(11)
40,760,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Stuart B. Burgdoerfer
3/31/2011
12,773
0
0
26.43
3/31/2021
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/30/2012
17,329
0
0
41.54
3/30/2022
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/29/2013
23,611
0
0
41.88
3/29/2023
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2014
22,797
0
0
54.21
3/31/2024
 
 
 
 
 
 
4/02/2015
14,030
0
0
91.17
4/02/2025
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2016
5,978
2,563(1)
0
87.81
3/31/2026
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2017
5,732
8,599(2)
0
47.10
3/31/2027
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/21/2018
3,519
14,080(5)
0
39.42
3/21/2028
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/28/2019
12,884
25,770(4)
0
27.94
3/28/2029
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2016
0
0
9,396(12)
382,981
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2017
0
0
25,160(13)
1,025,522
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/21/2018
0
0
14,079(14)
573,860
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4/25/2018
0
0
35,533(15)
1,448,325
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/28/2019
19,327(9)
787,769
32,212(16)
1,312,961
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
James L. Bersani
3/30/2012
11,279
0
0
41.54
3/30/2022
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/29/2013
11,638
0
0
41.88
3/29/2023
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2014
9,260
0
0
54.21
3/31/2024
 
 
 
 
 
 
4/02/2015
5,757
0
0
91.17
4/02/2025
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2016
5,978
2,563(1)
0
87.81
3/31/2026
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2017
4,777
7,166(2)
0
47.10
3/31/2027
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/21/2018
2,930
11,720(5)
0
39.42
3/21/2028
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/28/2019
11,453
22,906(4)
0
27.94
3/28/2029
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2016
5,040(17)
205,430
0
0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2017
21,496(18)
876,177
0
0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/21/2018
11,720(19)
477,707
0
0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4/25/2018
39,030(20)
1,590,863
0
0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/28/2019
17,180(9)
700,257
28,633(16)
1,167,081
40

37


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
Option Awards
Restricted Stock Awards
Name
Grant
Date
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
Option
Expiration
Date
Grant
Date
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
($)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
($)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Julie B. Rosen
 
 
 
 
 
 
9/28/2020
26,958(21)
1,098,808
0
0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deon N. Riley
 
 
 
 
 
 
12/29/2020
19,952(22)
813,244
0
0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Leslie H. Wexner
1/31/2013
161,559
0
0
45.03
5/14/2021
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/29/2013
55,129
0
0
41.88
5/14/2021
 
 
 
 
 
 
1/30/2014
124,191
0
0
49.38
5/14/2021
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2014
42,585
0
0
54.21
5/14/2021
 
 
 
 
 
 
1/28/2015
124,539
0
0
81.11
5/14/2021
 
 
 
 
 
 
4/02/2015
26,325
0
0
91.17
5/14/2021
 
 
 
 
 
 
1/27/2016
91,588
0
0
91.71
5/14/2021
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2016
19,132
0
0
87.81
5/14/2021
 
 
 
 
 
 
1/25/2017
37,834
0
0
61.85
5/14/2021
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2017
9,554
0
0
47.10
5/14/2021
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1/27/2016
0
0
19,627(23)
799,997
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2016
0
0
3,189(24)
129,984
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1/25/2017
0
0
23,646(25)
963,811
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2017
0
0
5,175(24)
210,933
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1/30/2019
0
0
10,224(26)
416,730
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1/29/2020
0
0
2,100(27)
85,596
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Charles C. McGuigan
3/31/2014
27,071
0
0
54.21
7/4/2021
 
 
 
 
 
 
4/02/2015
20,566
0
0
91.17
7/4/2021
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2016
7,772
0
0
87.81
7/4/2021
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2017
8,280
0
0
47.10
7/4/2021
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2016
0
0
6,106(12)
248,881
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2017
0
0
15,791(13)
643,641
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/21/2018
0
0
6,350(28)
258,826
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4/25/2018
0
0
10,956(29)
446,567
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/28/2019
775(9)
31,589
19,387(30)
790,214
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Shelley M. Milano
3/31/2016
5,381
0
0
87.81
11/7/2021
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2017
4,213
0
0
47.10
11/7/2021
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/21/2018
2,759
0
0
39.42
11/7/2021
 
 
 
 
 
 
5/16/2018
767
0
0
34.19
11/7/2021
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/28/2019
12,884
0
0
27.94
11/7/2021
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2017
7,783
317,235(31)
0
0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/21/2018
4,369
178,080(32)
0
0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5/16/2018
0
0
10,203(33)
415,874
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/28/2019
10,200(9)
415,752
17,001(16)
692,961
(1)
Options vested 100% on March 31, 2021.
(2)
Options vested 50% on March 31, 2021 and vest 50% on March 31, 2022.
(3)
Options vested 100% on March 21, 2021.
(4)
Options vested 50% on March 28, 2021 and vest 50% on March 28, 2022.
(5)
Options vested 25% on March 21, 2021, vest 37.5% on March 21, 2022 and vest 37.5% on March 21, 2023.
 
Option Awards
Restricted Stock Awards
Name
Grant
Date
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
Option
Expiration
Date
Grant
Date
Number
of Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)(21)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
($)(25)
Charles C. McGuigan
 
3/31/2011
 
 
22,991
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
26.43
 
 
3/31/2021
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/30/2012
 
 
20,580
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
41.54
 
 
3/30/2022
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/29/2013
 
 
28,037
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
41.88
 
 
3/29/2023
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2014
 
 
18,948
 
 
8,123
(1) 
 
0
 
 
54.21
 
 
3/31/2024
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4/02/2015
 
 
8,225
 
 
12,341
(3) 
 
0
 
 
91.17
 
 
4/02/2025
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2016
 
 
2,220
 
 
8,884
(5) 
 
0
 
 
87.81
 
 
3/31/2026
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2017
 
 
0
 
 
20,701
(7) 
 
0
 
 
47.10
 
 
3/31/2027
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/21/2018
 
 
0
 
 
25,400
(18) 
 
0
 
 
39.42
 
 
3/21/2028
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2014
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
13,539
(10) 
 
367,584
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4/02/2015
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
28,796
(12) 
 
781,811
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2016
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
32,570
(14) 
 
884,276
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2017
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
63,164
(16) 
 
1,714,903
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/21/2018
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
25,400
(19) 
 
689,610
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4/25/2018
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
46,954
(20) 
 
1,274,801
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
James L. Bersani
 
3/31/2011
 
 
28,373
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
26.43
 
 
3/31/2021
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/30/2012
 
 
11,279
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
41.54
 
 
3/30/2022
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/29/2013
 
 
11,638
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
41.88
 
 
3/29/2023
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2014
 
 
6,481
 
 
2,779
(1) 
 
0
 
 
54.21
 
 
3/31/2024
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4/02/2015
 
 
2,302
 
 
3,455
(3) 
 
0
 
 
91.17
 
 
4/02/2025
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2016
 
 
1,708
 
 
6,833
(5) 
 
0
 
 
87.81
 
 
3/31/2026
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2017
 
 
0
 
 
11,943
(7) 
 
0
 
 
47.10
 
 
3/31/2027
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/21/2018
 
 
0
 
 
14,650
(18) 
 
0
 
 
39.42
 
 
3/21/2028
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2014
 
 
10,189
(10) 
 
276,631
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4/02/2015
 
 
8,064
(12) 
 
218,938
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2016
 
 
13,438
(14) 
 
364,842
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2017
 
 
35,828
(16) 
 
972,730
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/21/2018
 
 
14,650
(19) 
 
397,748
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4/25/2018
 
 
48,787
(20) 
 
1,324,567
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
Shelley M. Milano
 
3/31/2016
 
 
3,587
 
 
1,794
(5) 
 
0
 
 
87.81
 
 
3/31/2026
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2017
 
 
0
 
 
10,533
(7) 
 
0
 
 
47.10
 
 
3/31/2027
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/21/2018
 
 
0
 
 
13,794
(18) 
 
0
 
 
39.42
 
 
3/21/2028
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5/16/2018
 
 
0
 
 
3,839
(21) 
 
0
 
 
34.19
 
 
5/16/2028
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2016
 
 
12,556
(23) 
 
340,895
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2017
 
 
24,578
(16) 
 
667,293
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/21/2018
 
 
13,794
(19) 
 
374,507
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5/16/2018
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
36,012
(29) 
 
977,726
 
41

38


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
Option Awards
Restricted Stock Awards
Name
Grant
Date
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
Option
Expiration
Date
Grant
Date
Number
of Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)(21)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
($)(25)
Nicholas P.M. Coe
 
3/30/2012
 
 
4,474
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
41.54
 
 
3/30/2022
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/29/2013
 
 
19,879
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
41.88
 
 
3/29/2023
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2014
 
 
17,913
 
 
7,678
(1) 
 
0
 
 
54.21
 
 
3/31/2024
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4/02/2015
 
 
6,579
 
 
9,873
(3) 
 
0
 
 
91.17
 
 
4/02/2025
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2016
 
 
1,708
 
 
6,833
(5) 
 
0
 
 
87.81
 
 
3/31/2026
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2017
 
 
0
 
 
17,516
(7) 
 
0
 
 
47.10
 
 
3/31/2027
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/21/2018
 
 
0
 
 
21,499
(18) 
 
0
 
 
39.42
 
 
3/21/2028
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2014
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
12,800
(10) 
 
347,520
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4/02/2015
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
23,038
(12) 
 
625,482
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2016
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
25,054
(14) 
 
680,216
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2017
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
49,363
(16) 
 
1,340,205
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/21/2018
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
21,499
(19) 
 
583,698
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/29/2018
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
29,573
(22) 
 
802,907
 
Martin P. Waters
 
3/31/2011
 
 
6,149
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
26.43
 
 
3/31/2021
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/30/2012
 
 
27,074
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
41.54
 
 
3/30/2022
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/29/2013
 
 
27,757
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
41.88
 
 
3/29/2023
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2014
 
 
15,007
 
 
6,433
(1) 
 
0
 
 
54.21
 
 
3/31/2024
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4/02/2015
 
 
5,593
 
 
8,392
(3) 
 
0
 
 
91.17
 
 
4/02/2025
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2016
 
 
1,708
 
 
6,833
(5) 
 
0
 
 
87.81
 
 
3/31/2026
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2017
 
 
0
 
 
14,331
(7) 
 
0
 
 
47.10
 
 
3/31/2027
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/21/2018
 
 
0
 
 
17,599
(18) 
 
0
 
 
39.42
 
 
3/21/2028
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2014
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
10,725
(10) 
 
291,184
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4/02/2015
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
19,581
(12) 
 
531,624
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2016
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
25,054
(14) 
 
680,216
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/31/2017
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
41,932
(16) 
 
1,138,454
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3/21/2018
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
17,599
(19) 
 
477,813
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4/25/2018
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
26,086
(20) 
 
708,235
 
(6)
(1)Options vest on March 31, 2019.
(2)Options vest on January 28, 2020.
(3)Options vest 50% on April 2, 2019 and 50% on April 2, 2020.
(4)Options vest 50% on January 27, 2020 and 50% on January 27, 2021.
(5)Options vest 25% on March 31, 2019, 37.5% on March 31, 2020 and 37.5%Shares vested 100% on March 31, 2021.
(7)
(6)Options vest 25% on January 25, 2020, 37.5% on January 25, 2021 and 37.5% on January 25, 2022.
(7)Options vest 20% on March 31, 2019, 20% on March 31, 2020, 30%Shares vested 50% on March 31, 2021 and 30%vest 50% on March 31, 2022.
(8)Options vest 20% on January 30, 2021, 20% on January 30, 2022, 30% on January 30, 2023 and 30% on January 30, 2024.
(9)
Shares vested 100% on January 30, 2019, subject to achievement of a performance condition.March 21, 2021.
(10)(9)
Shares vest 100% on March 31, 2019, subject to achievement of a performance condition.28, 2022.
(10)
(11)50% vestedShares vest 100% on January 28, 2019, subject to achievement of a performance condition. Remaining shares vest on January 28, 2020, also subject to achievement of a performance condition.February 20, 2023.
(12)(11)
Subject to achievement of a performance condition, shares vest 50%40% on April 2, 2019May 14, 2023, 30% on May 14, 2024 and 50%30% on April 2, 2020.May 14, 2025.
(12)
(13)25% vested on January 27, 2019, subjectSubject to achievement of a performance condition. Remainingcondition, 100% of these shares vest 37.5%vested on January 27, 2020 and 37.5% on January 27, 2021, also subjectMarch 31, 2021.
(13)
Subject to achievement of a performance condition.condition, shares vested 50% on March 31, 2021 and vest 50% on March 31, 2022.

39

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(14)
(14)Subject to achievement of a performance condition, shares vested 25% on March 21, 2021, vest 37.5% on March 21, 2022 and vest 37.5% on March 21, 2023.
(15)
Subject to achievement of a performance condition, shares vest 25% on March 31, 2019,April 25, 2021, 37.5% on March 31, 2020April 25, 2022 and 37.5% on April 25, 2023.
(16)
Subject to achievement of a performance condition, 100% of these shares vest on March 28, 2022.
(17)
Shares vested on March 31, 2021.
(18)
(15)Shares vested 50% on March 31, 2021 and vest 50% on March 31, 2022.
(19)
20%Shares vested 25% on March 21, 2021, vest 37.5% on March 21, 2022 and vest 37.5% on March 21, 2023.
(20)
Shares vest 25% on April 25, 2021, 37.5% on April 25, 2022 and 37.5% on April 25, 2023.
(21)
Shares vest 100% on September 28, 2023.
(22)
Shares vest 50% on December 29, 2021 and 50% on December 29, 2022.
(23)
The time-based vesting conditions for 100% of these shares vested on January 25, 201927, 2021. However, the performance-based vesting restrictions are still subject to review and approval by our HCC Committee.
(24)
Subject to achievement of a performance condition.condition, 100% of these shares vested on March 31, 2021.
(25)
The time-based vesting conditions for 100% of these shares vested on January 25, 2021. However, the performance-based vesting restrictions are still subject to review and approval by our HCC Committee.
(26)
The time-based vesting conditions for 80% of these shares vested on January 30, 2021. However, the performance-based vesting restrictions are still subject to review and approval by our HCC Committee. Remaining shares vest 20%100% on January 25, 2020, 30% on January 25, 202130, 2022 and 30% on January 25, 2022,are also subject to achievement of a performance condition.
(16)(27)
Subject to achievement of a performance condition, 100% of these shares vest 20% on March 31, 2019, 20% on March 31, 2020, 30% on March 31, 2021 and 30% on March 31, 2022.January 29, 2023.
(17)(28)
Subject to achievement of a performance condition, 80% of these shares vest 20%vested on JanuaryMarch 30, 2021 20% on January 30, 2022, 30% on January 30, 2023 and 30% on January 30, 2024.
(18)Options vest 20% on March 21, 2020, 20% on March 21, 2021, 30% on March 21, 2022 and 30% on March 21, 2023.2022.
(19)(29)
Subject to achievement of a performance condition, 85.72% of these shares vest 20% on March 21, 2020, 20%April 25, 2021 and 14.28% on March 21, 2021, 30% on March 21, 2022 and 30% on March 21, 2023.April 25, 2022.
(20)(30)
Subject to achievement of a performance condition, 100% of these shares vest 20% on April 25, 2020, 20% on April 25, 2021, 30% on April 25, 2022 and 30% on April 25,March 28, 2023.
(31)
(21)Options vest 20%Shares vested 94.74% on May 16, 2020, 20%March 31, 2021 and 5.26% on May 16, 2021, 30% on May 16, 2022 and 30% on May 16, 2023.March 31, 2022.
(32)
(22)Shares vested 63.15% on March 21, 2021 and 36.85% on March 21, 2022.
(33)
Subject to achievement of a performance condition, 70.59% of these shares vest 20% on March 29, 2020, 20% on March 29, 2021, 30% on March 29, 2022 and 30% on March 29, 2023.
(23)Shares vest on March 31, 2019.
(24)Shares vest 50% on April 2, 2019 and 50% on April 2, 2020.
(25)Shares vest 25% on March 31, 2019, 37.5% on March 31, 2020 and 37.5% on March 31, 2021.
(26)Shares vest 20% on March 31, 2019, 20% on March 31, 2020, 30% on March 31, 2021 and 30% on March 31, 2022.
(27)Shares vest 20% on March 21, 2020, 20% on March 21, 2021, 30% on March 21, 2022 and 30% on March 21, 2023.
(28)Shares vest 20% on April 25, 2020, 20% on April 25, 2021, 30% on April 25, 2022 and 30% on April 25, 2023.
(29)Subject to achievement of a performance condition, shares vest 20% on May 16, 2020, 20% on May 16, 2021 30%and 29.41% on May 16, 2022 and 30% on May 16, 2023.2022.
(30)Market value based on the $27.15 fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the last trading day of the fiscal year (February 1, 2019).
42

40


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Option Exercises and Stock Vested Information for Fiscal 2018

2020

The following table provides information relating to Option Awardsoption awards exercised and RSU Awardsawards vested during the fiscal year ended February 2, 2019.

 
Option Awards
Restricted Stock Awards
 
Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise (#)
Value
Realized on
Exercise ($)(1)
Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting (#)
Value
Realized on
Vesting ($)(2)
Leslie H. Wexner
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
176,851
 
 
6,046,536
 
Stuart B. Burgdoerfer
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
33,065
 
 
1,130,492
 
Charles C. McGuigan
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
56,869
 
 
1,952,881
 
James L. Bersani
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
22,055
 
 
839,630
 
Shelley M. Milano
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
Nicholas P. M. Coe
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
69,808
 
 
2,386,735
 
Martin P. Waters
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
32,437
 
 
1,113,855
 
January 30, 2021.
 
Option Awards
Restricted Stock Awards
 
Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise (#)
Value
Realized on
Exercise ($)(1)
Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting (#)
Value
Realized on
Vesting ($)(2)
Andrew M. Meslow
0
$0
21,427
$238,762
Stuart B. Burgdoerfer
0
0
27,606
292,624
James L. Bersani
28,373
101,411
28,925
311,275
Julie B. Rosen
0
0
0
0
Deon N. Riley
0
0
0
0
Leslie H. Wexner
0
0
117,668
1,277,193
Charles C. McGuigan
95,299
1,042,992
50,104
854,967
Shelley M. Milano
0
0
7,674
83,802
(1)
Option Award Value Realized is calculated based on the difference between (a) the sale price and the option exercise price for shares that were sold upon exercise and (b) the closing price on the day prior to the date of exercise and the option exercise price for shares that were held upon exercise.price.
(2)
Restricted Stock Award Value Realized is calculated based on the closing stock price on the date the RSUs vested.
43

41


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Retirement and Other Post-Employment Benefits

Non-qualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal 20182020(1)

Name
Executive
Contributions
in Last Fiscal
Year ($)(2)
Registrant
Contributions
in Last Fiscal
Year ($)(3)
Aggregate
Earnings in
Last Fiscal
Year ($)(4)
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)(5)
Aggregate
Balance at
Last Fiscal
Year
End($)(6)
Leslie H. Wexner
 
40,350
 
 
316,185
 
 
1,595,722
 
 
0
 
 
33,631,818
 
Stuart B. Burgdoerfer
 
53,248
 
 
220,948
 
 
197,519
 
 
0
 
 
4,251,690
 
Charles C. McGuigan
 
80,581
 
 
336,081
 
 
309,698
 
 
0
 
 
6,657,639
 
James L. Bersani
 
189,858
 
 
164,147
 
 
429,691
 
 
0
 
 
9,009,646
 
Shelley M. Milano
 
232,751
 
 
108,181
 
 
22,446
 
 
0
 
 
646,724
 
Nicholas P. M. Coe
 
124,298
 
 
483,586
 
 
148,917
 
 
0
 
 
3,354,105
 
Martin P. Waters
 
128,369
 
 
304,464
 
 
183,938
 
 
0
 
 
3,440,714
 
Name
Executive
Contributions
in Last Fiscal
Year ($)(2)
Registrant
Contributions
in Last Fiscal
Year ($)(3)
Aggregate
Earnings in
Last Fiscal
Year ($)(4)
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)(5)
Aggregate
Balance at
Last Fiscal
Year End ($)(6)
Andrew M. Meslow
$183,218
314,138
309,370
0
7,739,824
Stuart B. Burgdoerfer
23,958
210,169
211,770
0
5,271,529
James L. Bersani
94,554
156,052
420,554
0
10,712,861
Julie B. Rosen
0
0
0
0
0
Deon N. Riley
0
0
0
0
0
Leslie H. Wexner
16,525
200,188
1,347,385
37,380,867
0
Charles C. McGuigan
36,807
317,934
330,502
0
8,222,681
Shelley M. Milano
105,009
165,429
59,899
0
1,534,122
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
Amounts disclosed include non-qualified cash deferrals, Company matching contributions, retirement credits and earnings under the Company’s Supplemental Retirement PlanSRP (a non-qualified defined contribution plan) and stock deferrals and related reinvested dividend earnings under the Company’s amended and restated 1993 Stock Option and Performance Incentive Plan (the “1993 Plan”), the Company's 2011 Stock Option and Performance Incentive Plan (the “2011 Plan”) and 2015 Plan. Executive Contributions and related matching Registrant Contributions represent 20182020 calendar year deferrals and matches on incentive compensation payments earned based on performance for the Fall 20172019 season, which was paid in March 2018,2020, and for the Spring 20182020 season, which was paid in August 2018.2020.
(2)
All of the contributions are reported in the 20182020 Summary Compensation Table under the “Salary” and/or “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” columns.
(3)
Reflects the Company’s 200% match of associate contributions of up to 3% of base salary and bonus above the IRS qualified plan maximum compensation limit and the Company’s retirement contribution of 6% for less than five years of service or 8% for five or more years of service of compensation above the IRS qualified plan maximum compensation limit. Associates become fully vested in these contributions after six years of service. These contributions are also included under the “All Other Compensation” column of the 20182020 Summary Compensation Table.
(4)
Non-qualified deferred cash compensation balances earn a fixed rate of interest determined prior to the beginning of each year.

The portion of the earnings on deferred cash compensation that exceeds 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate in the amount of $638,289, $79,008, $123,879, $164,461, $8,979, $59,567$146,274, $100,128, $197,626, $637,061, $156,266 and $48,872$28,321 for Mr. Meslow, Mr. Burgdoerfer, Mr. Bersani, Mr. Wexner, Mr. Burgdoerfer, Mr. McGuigan Mr. Bersani,and Ms. Milano, Mr. Coe and Mr. Waters, respectively, is disclosed in the “Change in Pension Value and Non-qualifiedNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column of the 20182020 Summary Compensation Table.

Amount includes dividends earned on deferred stock and RSU balances in the amount of $18,538$2,576 for Mr. Bersani and $61,758 for Mr. Waters.Bersani. Dividends are reinvested into additional stock units based on the closing market price of Common Stock on the dividend payment date.

(5)
Participants may elect to receive the funds in a lump sum or in up to ten annual installments following termination of employment, but generally may not make withdrawals during their employment. Deferrals under the Supplemental Retirement Plan,SRP, the 1993 Plan, the 2011 Plan and the 2015 Plan are unfunded.
(6)
Balance includes the value of deferred stock and RSUs at calendar year-end in the amount of $54,978$354,713 for Mr. Waters.Bersani. Value is calculated based on a stock price of $27.15$40.76 per share of Common Stock on February 1, 2019.January 29, 2021. Balances for Mr. McGuigan and Ms. Milano will be paid out in 2021 in connection with their terminations of employment.

Estimated Post-Employment Payments and Benefits

We have entered into certain agreements with our NEOs that will require us to provide compensation in the event of a termination of employment, including a termination following a change in control of our Company.

Mr. Wexner is not covered by such an agreement but is entitled to certain termination compensation under the terms of our benefit and stock plans.

The following tables set forth the expected benefits to be received by each of the other NEOs in the event of termination resulting from various scenarios, assuming a termination date of February 2, 2019January 30, 2021 and a stock price of $27.15,$40.76, the price of our Common Stock on February 1, 2019.January 29, 2021. Each scenario relates to the single termination event described and amounts are not cumulative in situations where multiple scenarios may apply.

On February 4, 2021 the Company announced that Stuart B. Burgdoerfer had communicated to the Board his desire to retire as CFO of L Brands and Interim CEO of the Victoria’s Secret business. Mr. Burgdoerfer will remain in his CFO role through August 2021.

42

44

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Assumptions and explanations of the numbers set forth in the tables below are set forth in additional text following the tables.(1)

Leslie H. Wexner

 
Involuntary Without Cause or
Voluntary With Good Reason
Involuntary
Without Cause
following
Change in
Control
($)
Death
($)(5)
Disability
($)
Voluntary
Resignation/
Retirement
($)
 
w/out
Release
($)
& Signed
Release
($)
Base Salary
$
0
 
 
0
 
$
0
 
$
0
 
$
0
 
$
0
 
Bonus(2)
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
 
 
Gain of Accelerated Stock Options(3)
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
Value of Pro-rated or Accelerated RSUs(3)
 
5,732,017
 
 
5,732,017
 
 
11,578,335
 
 
11,578,334
 
 
11,578,335
 
 
5,732,017
 
Benefits and Perquisites(4)
 
75,490
 
 
75,490
 
 
75,490
 
 
2,075,490
 
 
550,490
 
 
75,490
 
Tax Gross-Up
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
Total
$
5,807,507
 
$
5,807,507
 
$
11,653,825
 
$
13,653,825
 
$
12,128,825
 
$
5,807,507
 
Andrew M. Meslow

 
Involuntary Without Cause or
Voluntary With Good Reason
Involuntary
Without Cause
following
Change in
Control
($)
Death
($)(5)
Disability
($)
Voluntary
Resignation/
Retirement
($)
 
w/out
Release
($)
Signed
Release
($)
Base Salary
$1,275,000
$2,550,000
$2,550,000
$0
$0
$0
Bonus(1)
0
2,358,750
6,738,052
0
0
0
Cash Retention(2)
0
0
497,608
0
0
0
Gain of Accelerated Stock Options(3)
0
0
299,331
299,331
299,331
0
Value of Pro-rated or Accelerated PSUs/RSUs(3)
0
9,862,738
48,476,113
48,476,113
48,476,113
0
Benefits and Perquisites(4)
37,003
46,761
46,761
2,017,488
566,118
0
Tax Gross-Up
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Total
$1,312,003
$14,818,249
$58,607,865
$50,792,932
$49,341,562
$0

Stuart B. Burgdoerfer

 
Involuntary Without Cause or
Voluntary With Good Reason
Involuntary
Without Cause
following
Change in
Control
($)
Death
($)(5)
Disability
($)
Voluntary
Resignation/
Retirement
($)
 
w/out
Release
($)
& Signed
Release
($)
Base Salary
$
900,000
 
$
1,800,000
 
$
1,800,000
 
$
0
 
$
0
 
$
0
 
Bonus(2)
 
0
 
 
1,530,000
 
 
2,433,618
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
Gain of Accelerated Stock Options(3)
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
Value of Pro-rated or Accelerated RSUs(3)
 
1,590,854
 
 
1,590,854
 
 
4,345,330
 
 
4,345,330
 
 
4,345,330
 
 
1,590,854
 
Benefits and Perquisites(4)
 
91,923
 
 
100,098
 
 
100,098
 
 
1,875,573
 
 
529,661
 
 
75,573
 
Tax Gross-Up
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
Total
$
2,582,777
 
$
5,020,952
 
$
8,679,046
 
$
6,220,903
 
$
4,874,991
 
$
1,666,427
 
 
Involuntary Without Cause or
Voluntary With Good Reason
Involuntary
Without Cause
following
Change in
Control
($)
Death
($)(5)
Disability
($)
Voluntary
Resignation/
Retirement
($)
 
w/out
Release
($)
& Signed
Release
($)
Base Salary
$1,200,000
$2,400,000
$2,400,000
$0
$0
$0
Bonus(1)
0
2,160,000
4,124,520
0
0
0
Gain of Accelerated Stock Options(3)
0
0
349,239
349,239
349,239
0
Value of Pro-rated or Accelerated PSUs/RSUs(3)
0
3,097,842
5,531,417
5,531,417
5,531,417
306,352
Benefits and Perquisites(4)
30,974
37,717
37,717
2,017,488
545,860
17,488
Tax Gross-Up
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Total
$1,230,974
$7,695,559
$12,442,893
$7,898,144
$6,426,516
$323,840
James L. Bersani

Charles C. McGuigan

Involuntary Without Cause or
Voluntary With Good Reason
Involuntary
Without Cause
following
Change in
Control
($)
Death
($)(5)
Disability
($)
Voluntary
Resignation/
Retirement
($)
Involuntary Without Cause or
Voluntary With Good Reason
Involuntary
Without Cause
following
Change in
Control
($)
Death
($)(5)
Disability
($)
Voluntary
Resignation/
Retirement
($)
w/out
Release
($)
& Signed
Release
($)
w/out
Release
($)
& Signed
Release
($)
Base Salary
$
1,300,000
 
$
2,600,000
 
$
2,600,000
 
$
0
 
$
0
 
$
0
 
$800,000
$1,600,000
$1,600,000
$0
$0
$0
Bonus(2)(1)
 
0
 
 
2,210,000
 
 
3,515,226
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
0
1,120,000
2,365,664
0
0
0
Gain of Accelerated Stock Options(3)
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
0
0
309,360
309,360
309,360
0
Value of Pro-rated or Accelerated RSUs(3)
 
2,144,769
 
 
2,144,769
 
 
5,712,984
 
 
5,712,984
 
 
5,712,984
 
 
2,144,769
 
Value of Pro-rated or Accelerated PSUs/RSUs(3)
0
2,738,420
5,017,515
5,017,515
5,017,515
1,317,689
Benefits and Perquisites(4)
 
124,420
 
 
130,668
 
 
130,668
 
 
2,111,924
 
 
665,048
 
 
111,924
 
31,142
37,969
37,969
2,017,488
445,902
17,488
Tax Gross-Up
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Total
$
3,569,189
 
$
7,085,437
 
$
11,958,878
 
$
7,824,908
 
$
6,378,032
 
$
2,256,693
 
$831,142
$5,496,389
$9,330,508
$7,344,363
$5,772,777
$1,335,177
45

43


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Julie B. Rosen
 
Involuntary Without Cause or
Voluntary With Good Reason
Involuntary
Without Cause
following
Change in
Control
($)
Death
($)(5)
Disability
($)
Voluntary
Resignation/
Retirement
($)
 
w/out
Release
($)
& Signed
Release
($)
Base Salary
$0
$1,700,000
$1,700,000
$0
$0
$0
Bonus(1)
0
977,500
805,632
0
0
0
Gain of Accelerated Stock Options(3)
0
0
0
0
0
0
Value of Pro-rated or Accelerated PSUs/RSUs(3)
0
122,076
1,098,808
1,098,808
1,098,808
0
Benefits and Perquisites(4)
13,116
42,011
42,011
1,713,116
455,433
0
Tax Gross-Up
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Total
$13,116
$2,841,587
$3,646,451
$2,811,924
$1,554,241
$0
Deon N. Riley

James L. Bersani

 
Involuntary Without Cause or
Voluntary With Good Reason
Involuntary
Without Cause
following
Change in
Control
($)
Death
($)(5)
Disability
($)
Voluntary
Resignation/
Retirement
($)
 
w/out
Release
($)
& Signed
Release
($)
Base Salary
$
770,000
 
$
1,540,000
 
$
1,540,000
 
$
0
 
$
0
 
$
0
 
Bonus(2)
 
0
 
 
1,001,000
 
 
1,574,823
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
Gain of Accelerated Stock Options(3)
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
Value of Pro-rated or Accelerated RSUs(3)
 
1,168,563
 
 
1,168,563
 
 
3,555,455
 
 
3,555,455
 
 
3,555,455
 
 
1,168,563
 
Benefits and Perquisites(4)
 
62,178
 
 
68,426
 
 
68,426
 
 
2,049,682
 
 
470,306
 
 
49,682
 
Tax Gross-Up
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
Total
$
2,000,741
 
$
3,777,989
 
$
6,738,704
 
$
5,605,137
 
$
4,025,761
 
$
1,218,245
 

Shelley M. Milano

 
Involuntary Without Cause or
Voluntary With Good Reason
Involuntary
Without Cause
following
Change in
Control
($)
Death
($)(5)
Disability
($)
Voluntary
Resignation/
Retirement
($)(6)
 
w/out
Release
($)
& Signed
Release
($)
Base Salary
$
900,000
 
$
1,800,000
 
$
1,800,000
 
$
0
 
$
0
 
$
0
 
Bonus(2)
 
0
 
 
1,080,000
 
 
1,349,914
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
Gain of Accelerated Stock Options(3)
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
Value of Pro-rated or Accelerated RSUs(3)
 
0
 
 
759,413
 
 
2,360,421
 
 
2,360,421
 
 
2,360,421
 
 
0
 
Benefits and Perquisites(4)
 
16,053
 
 
64,724
 
 
64,724
 
 
1,373,719
 
 
504,732
 
 
0
 
Tax Gross-Up
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
Total
$
916,053
 
$
3,704,137
 
$
5,575,059
 
$
3,734,140
 
$
2,865,153
 
$
0
 

Nicholas P.M. Coe

 
Involuntary Without Cause or
Voluntary With Good Reason
Involuntary
Without Cause
following
Change in
Control
($)
Death
($)(5)
Disability
($)
Voluntary
Resignation/
Retirement
($)
 
w/out
Release
($)
& Signed
Release ($)
Base Salary
$
1,130,000
 
$
2,260,000
 
$
2,260,000
 
$
0
 
$
0
 
$
0
 
Bonus(2)
 
0
 
 
2,034,000
 
 
6,590,124
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
Gain of Accelerated Stock Options(3)
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
Value of Pro-rated or Accelerated RSUs(3)
 
1,725,464
 
 
1,725,464
 
 
4,380,028
 
 
4,380,028
 
 
4,380,028
 
 
1,725,464
 
Benefits and Perquisites(4)
 
217,549
 
 
225,787
 
 
225,787
 
 
2,201,074
 
 
712,693
 
 
201,074
 
Tax Gross-Up
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
Total
$
3,073,013
 
$
6,245,251
 
$
13,455,939
 
$
6,581,102
 
$
5,092,721
 
$
1,926,538
 

44

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Martin P. Waters

 
Involuntary Without Cause or
Voluntary With Good Reason
Involuntary
Without Cause
following
Change in
Control
($)
Death
($)(5)
Disability
($)
Voluntary
Resignation/
Retirement
($)(6)
 
w/out
Release
($)
& Signed
Release
($)
Base Salary
$
925,000
 
$
1,850,000
 
$
1,850,000
 
$
0
 
$
0
 
$
0
 
Bonus(2)
 
0
 
 
1,572,500
 
 
3,430,022
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
Gain of Accelerated Stock Options(3)
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
Value of Pro-rated or Accelerated RSUs(3)
 
0
 
 
1,498,816
 
 
3,827,526
 
 
3,827,526
 
 
3,827,526
 
 
0
 
Benefits and Perquisites(4)
 
16,350
 
 
108,912
 
 
108,912
 
 
1,884,387
 
 
544,725
 
 
0
 
Tax Gross-Up
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
 
N/A
 
Total
$
941,350
 
$
5,030,228
 
$
9,216,460
 
$
5,711,913
 
$
4,372,251
 
$
0
 
 
Involuntary Without Cause or
Voluntary With Good Reason
Involuntary
Without Cause
following
Change in
Control
($)
Death
($)(5)
Disability
($)
Voluntary
Resignation/
Retirement
($)
 
w/out
Release
($)
& Signed
Release
($)
Base Salary
$0
$1,500,000
$1,800,000
$0
$0
$0
Bonus(1)
0
600,000
720,000
0
0
0
Gain of Accelerated Stock Options(3)
0
0
0
0
0
0
Value of Pro-rated or Accelerated PSUs/RSUs(3)
0
33,872
813,244
813,244
813,244
0
Benefits and Perquisites(4)
13,116
41,920
41,920
1,513,116
429,217
0
Tax Gross-Up
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Total
$13,116
$2,175,792
$3,075,164
$2,326,360
$1,242,461
$0
(1)Assumes a termination date of February 2, 2019.
(2)
Bonus amounts assumed at target. Under “Involuntary without Cause or Voluntary with Good Reason” termination scenarios, actual bonus payments would be equal to the bonus payment the NEO would have received if he or she had remained employed with the Company for a period of one year after the termination date of February 2, 2019.January 30, 2021. Under an “Involuntary Without Cause following Change in Control” termination scenario, bonus payments will be equal to the sum of the last four seasonal bonus payments received.
(2)
Reflects the unpaid portion of cash retention bonus, pro-rated from the date of the agreement to termination date.
(3)
Reflects the value of unvested RSUs, PSUs at target and stock options that, subject to achievement of pre-established performance conditions, if applicable, would become vested based on the $27.15$40.76 fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the last trading day of the fiscal year (February 1, 2019)(January 29, 2021).
(4)
Estimates for benefits and perquisites include the pro rata value of retirement plan contributions on earnings accrued up to the termination date and the continuation of medical, dental and other insurance benefits. Under the “Death” and “Disability” scenarios, includes proceeds from life and disability insurance policies and the value of unvested retirement plan balances that would become vested.
(5)
Generally, in the event of an NEO’s death, subject to the achievement of any underlying performance conditions, any time-vesting conditions are deemed satisfied. Upon death, any outstanding RSUs held by Mr. Wexner vest in full without regard to performance. RSUsand PSUs awarded to our other NEOs continue to be subject to continued vesting based on performance (except for RSUs granted to Mr. Bersani and Ms. Milano, for whom there are no performance conditions attached to the RSU grants awarded in March orand April of 2018)2018, which are not subject to performance conditions).
(6)Executive officers Milano and Waters have not met the age and/or service requirement to qualify for pro rata RSU vesting and retirement plan contributions under the retirement provisions of the 2011 Plan, the 2015 Plan and the qualified and non-qualified retirement plans.

Assumptions and Explanations of Numbers in Tables

The CompensationHCC Committee retains discretion to provide, and in the past has provided, additional benefits to NEOs upon termination or resignation if it determines the circumstances so warrant.

The tables do not include the payment of the aggregate balance of the NEO’s non-qualified deferred compensation that is disclosed in the Non-qualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal 20172020 table above.
46

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Confidentiality, Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreements

As a condition to each NEO’s entitlement to receive certain severance payments and equity vesting acceleration upon certain termination scenarios, the NEO is required to execute a release of claims against us and shall be bound by the terms of certain restrictive covenants, including non-competition and non-solicitation agreements which prohibit the NEO from soliciting or diverting any current or potential employee, customer, or supplier or competing with any of our businesses in which he or she has been employed for a period of one year from the date of termination.

Termination Provisions—Definitions of Cause and Good Reason

The agreements for all NEOs other than Mr. Wexner, who does not have an agreement, contain customary definitions of cause and good reason. “Cause” generally means that (1) for Messrs. Meslow and Burgdoerfer, the NEO (1) willfully failed to perform his or her duties with the Company (other than a failure resulting from the NEO’s incapacity due to physical or mental illness);, or for our other NEOs, he or she was grossly negligent in the performance of his or her duties with the Company; (2) the NEO has pleadpled “guilty” or “no contest” to or has been convicted of an act which is defined as a felony under federal or state law; or (3) the NEO engaged in willful misconduct in bad faith (or, in Messrs. Meslow and Burgdoerfer’s case “willful misconduct”) which could reasonably be expected to materially harm the Company’s business or its reputation.

“Good

In addition, Messrs. Meslow and Burgdoerfer and Mses. Riley and Rosen have the right to resign for “Good Reason” in case of certain events. “Good Reason” generally means (1) for Mr. Meslow, the failure to continue as CEO of the Company (or, in the event of a change in control, the resulting ultimate parent company) and, for Mr. Burgdoerfer and Mses. Riley and Rosen, the NEO’s failure to continue in a capacity originally contemplated in the NEO’s agreement; (2) the assignment to the NEO of any duties materially inconsistent with the NEO’s position, duties, authority, responsibilities or reporting requirements, as set out in his or her agreement;agreement or, for Mr. Meslow, the assignment to another person of duties that would typically be performed by the CEO of the Company (or, in the event of a change in control, the resulting ultimate parent company); (3) a material reduction of or a delay in payment

45

TABLE OF CONTENTS

of the NEO’s total cash compensation and benefits from those required to be provided;provided or, for Mr. Meslow, a breach by the Company of his employment agreement or any RSU award agreement or other equity agreement; (4) the requirement that, for Mr. Burgdoerfer and Mses. Riley and Rosen, the NEO be based outside of Columbus, Ohio, or, for Mr. Meslow, the requirement that the NEO be based outside of the United States, in each case other than for travel that is reasonably required to carry out the NEO’s duties; or (5) the failure by the Company to obtain the assumption in writing of its obligation to perform the agreement by a successor.

Payments Upon a Termination in Connection with a Change in Control

A “Change in Control” of the Company will be deemed to have occurred upon the first of any of the following events to occur:

(a)
any person, together with all affiliates, becomes a beneficial owner of securities representing 33% or more of the combined voting power of the voting stock then outstanding;
(b)
during any period of 24 consecutive months, individuals who at the beginning of such period constitute the Board (and any new director, whose election by the Board or nomination for election by the stockholders of the Company was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the directors then in office who either were directors at the beginning of the period or whose election or nomination for election was so approved) cease for any reason to constitute a majority of directors then constituting the Board;
(c)
a reorganization, merger or consolidation of the Company is consummated, unless more than 50% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock are beneficially owned by individuals and entities who owned Common Stock just prior to such reorganization, merger or consolidation; or
(d)
the consummation of a complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company.

Participants in the 2015 Plan and the 2020 Plan receive accelerated vesting of equity awards upon a Change in Control in the event of the participant’s termination of employment (other than for Cause) within 24 months of the Change in Control (“double trigger” vesting).

47

TABLE OF CONTENTS

No Tax Gross-up

In the event of a termination following a Change in Control, none of our NEOs are entitled to reimbursement or gross-up for any excise taxes that may be imposed under Section 280G of the Code.

Executive Summary

46

We are committed to aligning our executive compensation with our Company’s performance. In connection with the Company’s strong performance in fiscal 2020, our CEO earned above-target short-term performance incentive payments according to the payout formulas established at the beginning of each six-month performance period without retroactive adjustment for the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on results. Long-term equity incentives were granted to our CEO as a one-time incentive in connection with his promotion during 2020. Substantially all of the long-term incentive is subject to challenging performance requirements that will only be earned if the Company achieves rigorous growth, profitability and return metrics that provide incentive for a balance of growth and profitability, support the strategic direction of the Company, and alignment with stockholders.
 In summary, there is alignment between our performance, our stockholders’ interests and our CEO’s pay. Accordingly, we recommend stockholders vote FOR our executive compensation program as outlined in Proposal 3.
48

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Fiscal 20182020 Director Compensation

The following table sets forth compensation earned by the individuals who served as directors of the Company during fiscal 20182020(1).

Name
Fees Earned or
Paid in
Cash($)(2)
Stock
Awards($)(3)
Total ($)
Patricia S. Bellinger(4)
$
119,125
 
$
111,913
 
$
231,038
 
E. Gordon Gee
 
134,400
 
 
134,422
 
 
268,822
 
Dennis S. Hersch
 
121,900
 
 
121,926
 
 
243,826
 
Donna A. James
 
164,400
 
 
144,435
 
 
308,835
 
David T. Kollat
 
171,900
 
 
156,931
 
 
328,831
 
Michael G. Morris
 
124,400
 
 
124,410
 
 
248,810
 
Robert H. Schottenstein(4)
 
120,932
 
 
111,913
 
 
232,845
 
Stephen D. Steinour
 
111,900
 
 
111,913
 
 
223,813
 
Allan R. Tessler
 
194,400
 
 
169,427
 
 
363,827
 
Abigail S. Wexner
 
141,900
 
 
131,939
 
 
273,839
 
Raymond Zimmerman
 
134,400
 
 
134,422
 
 
268,822
 
Name
Fees Earned
or
Paid in
Cash ($)(2)
Stock
Awards
($)(3)
Total ($)
Patricia S. Bellinger
$100,422
$134,406
$234,828
E. Gordon Gee(4)
0
38,032
38,032
Donna A. James
101,707
134,406
236,113
Michael G. Morris
120,745
146,909
267,654
Sarah E. Nash(5)(6)
272,970
449,406
722,376
Robert H. Schottenstein
100,498
134,406
234,904
Anne Sheehan
109,420
146,909
256,328
Stephen D. Steinour
114,516
134,406
248,922
Allan R. Tessler(4)(5)
75,000
47,936
122,936
Abigail S. Wexner
84,832
111,905
196,737
Leslie H. Wexner(4)
80,543
111,905
192,449
Raymond Zimmerman(4)
0
38,032
38,032
(1)
Directors who are also associates receive no additional compensation for their service as directors. Our current Board’s compensation plan does not provide for stock option awards, non-equity incentive plan compensation, pension or non-qualified deferred compensation. At the end of four years of membership on the Board, each member must maintain ownership of Common Stock equal to the amount of Common Stock received as director compensation over the four-year period.
(2)
Directors receive an annual cash retainer of $111,900; directors receive an additional annual cash retainer of $12,500 for membership on the Audit and CompensationHCC Committees and Special Committee on Stockholder Litigation and $10,000 for all other committee memberships; the Audit Committee Chair receivesand Special Committee on Stockholder Litigation Chairs receive an additional $20,000; the CompensationHCC Committee Chair and the Nominating & Governance Committee Chair each receivesreceive an additional $15,000; and other committee chairsChairs receive an additional $10,000; and the lead independent director received an additional cash retainer of $15,000 and the Board Chair receives an additional cash retainer of $15,000.$80,000. Cash compensation was suspended for the first quarter of 2020 in connection with store closures and the COVID-19 crisis.
(3)
Directors receive an annual stock retainer worth $111,900; directors receive an additional annual stock grant worth $12,500 for membership on the Audit and CompensationHCC Committees and worth $10,000 for other committee memberships; and the lead independent director receivesreceived an additional stock retainer of $15,000. Stock retainers were granted under the 2015 Plan. The number of shares issued is calculated based on the fair market value of Common Stock on the date the shares were issued. The value of stock awards reflects the aggregate grant date fair value, excluding estimated forfeitures, computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718 Compensation—Stock Compensation, for each award. See Note 2119 to the Company’s financial statements filed in the 20182020 10-K for a discussion of our assumptions in determining the aggregate grant date fair value of these awards.
(4)
(4)Compensation for Ms. BellingerEffective May 14, 2020, Dr. Gee, Mr. Tessler and Mr. Schottenstein reflectsZimmerman retired from the Board and in connection with his retirement as CEO, Mr. Wexner became a non-executive Board member as Chairman Emeritus. Stock and cash payments have been pro-rated payment for Committee membership. based on the number of days of Board service. Mr. Tessler was the lead independent director prior to his retirement from the Board.
(5)
Ms. Bellinger joined the Inclusion CommitteeNash and Mr. Schottenstein joinedTessler each received cash payments of an additional $75,000 in connection with their significant contributions to work on the Audit Committee effective May 16, 2018.agreement with Sycamore Partners for the sale of 55% of the VS NewCo business.
(6)
In recognition of Ms. Nash’s extraordinary commitment of time and effort following her appointment.as non-executive Chair of the Board, Ms. Nash was granted a stock award with a value of $225,000 that vests 30% after each of the one and two year anniversaries of the grant and 40% after three years, subject to continued service. Beginning in fiscal 2021, the Board determined that Ms. Nash’s total compensation for her service as non-executive Chair will be $700,000, with 50% paid in cash and 50% paid in stock.
49

47


TABLE OF CONTENTS

HUMAN CAPITAL AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The CompensationHCC Committee of the Board is composed of three directors who are independent, as defined under the NYSE listing standards. Additionally, each member of the CompensationHCC Committee is a “non-employee director” within the meaning of Section 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The CompensationHCC Committee reviews the CD&A on behalf of the Board.

The CompensationHCC Committee has reviewed and discussed the CD&A with management, and based on the review and discussions, the CompensationHCC Committee recommended to the Board that the CD&A be included in the Company’s annual report on Form2020 10-K for the year ended February 2, 2019 and the Company’s proxy statement.

   We are committed to aligning our executive compensation with our Company’s performance. Over the last several years, the Company implemented a series of initiatives designed to better position several of our businesses for the future. The short-term effects of some of these initiatives have not produced the results that are expected. In response, the Compensation Committee reduced our CEO’s target and actual compensation each year since 2016. These actions by the Compensation Committee (summarized below), resulted in CEO compensation that decreased 83% from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2018 while total shareholder return decreased 66% during this same period.
   The Board reviews the Company’s short- and long-term strategy with our CEO and management team regularly. As we have done in the past, we will continue to calibrate our CEO’s compensation to the results of the business, and to the returns of our stakeholders.
2017 Compensation Actions
   •
Did not grant a Fall 2017 long-term performance-based equity incentive award. As a result, CEO long-term performance-based equity awards for fiscal 2017 were 70% ($3.5 million) below target.
   •
Exercised negative discretion to eliminate the Fall season short-term incentive payout, resulting in a total 2017 payout that was 75% ($3.3 million) below target.
   •
As a result of these actions, CEO compensation was 60% ($6.8 million) below the reduced target for fiscal 2017.
   •
CEO total compensation decreased by 61% ($9.1 million) from fiscal 2016 to fiscal 2017, while total shareholder return decreased by 15% during the same period.
2018 Compensation Actions
   The Compensation Committee adjusted Mr. Wexner’s target compensation for fiscal 2018 to reduce the amount of fixed compensation and put greater emphasis on performance-based compensation:
   •
Adjusted base salary from $2 million to $1 million, a reduction of 50% or $1 million.
   •
Reduced the short-term performance-based incentive compensation target from $4.4 million to $1.5 million, a reduction of 66% or $2.9 million.
   •
Adjusted the pay mix, increasing the weighting of long-term performance-based incentive compensation from 44% to 72% of total direct compensation.
   •
Decreased total direct compensation at target from $11.4 million to $9.0 million, a reduction of 21% or $2.4 million.
   •
Actual direct CEO compensation for fiscal 2018 was $3.9 million or 57% ($5.1 million) below the reduced target.
   •
Over the three-year period from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2018, CEO compensation decreased 83% while total shareholder return decreased 66%.
2019 Compensation Actions
   The Compensation Committee further adjusted Mr. Wexner’s target compensation for fiscal 2019 by reducing the amount of fixed compensation and long-term performance-based incentive compensation at target:
   •
Reduced base salary from $1 million to $900,000, a reduction of 10%.
   •
Reduced long-term performance-based incentive compensation target from $6.5 million to $5.1 million.
   •
Decreased total direct compensation at target from $9.0 million to $7.5 million, a reduction of 17% or $1.5 million.

48

TABLE OF CONTENTS

With these actions to reduce CEO pay, Mr. Wexner’s total compensation for fiscal 2018 was $4.6 million, which is well below the median of our peers. In addition, 2019 target pay is 39% below the median. In summary, there is alignment between our performance, our stockholders’ interests and our CEO’s pay. Accordingly, we recommend stockholders vote FOR the executive compensation program as outlined in Proposal 3.

 
Human Capital and Compensation Committee
 
 
 
David T, Kollat,Michael G. Morris, Chair
 
E. Gordon GeePatricia Bellinger
 
Michael G. MorrisRobert H. Schottenstein

49

50

TABLE OF CONTENTS

20182020 PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE

Pay Ratio

In accordance with the requirements of Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K (which we collectively refer to as the “Pay Ratio Rule”), we are providing the following estimated information for 2018:

fiscal 2020:
the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees (except our CEO) was $14,186;
$9,876;
the annual total compensation of our CEO was $4,553,310;$18,494,939; and
the ratio of these two amounts is 3211,873 to 1. We believe that this ratio is calculated in a manner consistent with the requirements of the Pay Ratio Rule.

Methodology for Identifying Our “Median Employee”

Identifying and Adjusting our Employee Population

To identify the median of the annual total compensation of all of our employees (other than our Chief Executive Officer)CEO), we identified our total employee population as of February 2, 2019,January 30, 2021, the last day in our fiscal year. Our employee population consisted of full-time, part-time, seasonal and temporary employees globally.

Determining our Median Employee

To identify our median employee, we calculated the cash compensation paid during the fiscal year for the employee population, annualizing the cash compensation of any permanent employee who joined the Company during the fiscal year. We identified the median compensation amount using this compensation measure which was consistently applied to all our employees in the calculation. We then selected a reasonably representative employee with total compensation equal to the median compensation amount as our “median employee”.

employee.”

Using the methodologies described above, we determined that our median employee was a part-time, hourly employee. The total compensation of the median employee was $14,186.

$9,876.

Determination of Annual Total Compensation of our Median Employee and our CEO

Once we identified our median employee, we then calculated such employee’s annual total compensation for 20182020 using the same methodology we used for purposes of determining the annual compensation of our NEOs for 2018.

2020.

Our CEO’s annual total compensation for 20182020 for purposes of the Pay Ratio Rule is equal to the amount reported in the “Total” column in the 20182020 Summary Compensation Table.

SEC

The Commission’s rules for identifying the median employee and calculating the pay ratio allow companies to apply various methodologies and apply various assumptions and, as a result, the pay ratio reported by us may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported by other companies. Our median employee worked approximately 1615 hours per week during fiscal 2018.2020. If the total compensation per hour earned by the median employee was extrapolated to full-time employment, median compensation would be approximately $35,450$26,500 and the ratio would be 128698 to 1.

51

50


TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table shows certain information about the securities ownership of all directors (and nominees) of the Company, the executive officers of the Company named in the “2018“2020 Summary Compensation Table” above and all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group.

Name of Beneficial Owner
Number of Shares of Common
Stock Beneficially
Owned(a)
Owned(a)(b)
Percent of Class
Patricia S. Bellinger
6,30924,248(d)
*
James Bersani
191,557211,022(c)(e)
*
Stuart B. Burgdoerfer
128,745200,472(c)
*
Nicholas P. M. Coe
106,312(c)
*
E. Gordon Gee
18,248(d)
*
Dennis S. Hersch
13,559,220(d)(f)
4.93
%
Donna A. James
57,68978,717(d)
*
David T. KollatFrancis A. Hondal
162,8590
*
Danielle Lee
0
*
Charles C. McGuigan
243,026186,852(c)(h)(g)
*
Andrew M. Meslow
191,766(c)
*
Shelley B. Milano
24,95975,560(c)
*
Michael G. Morris
20,59530,187(d)
*
Sarah E. Nash
26,735(d)
*
Deon N. Riley
0
*
Julie B. Rosen
0
*
Robert H. Schottenstein
10,80928,843(d)(k)(i)
*
Anne Sheehan
012,524(d)
*
Stephen D. Steinour
14,16529,439(d)
*
Allan R. Tessler
110,438
*
Martin P. Waters
307,644(c)(e)
*
Abigail S. Wexner
14,552,57115,293,575(g)(f)
5.29
%5.49%
Leslie H. Wexner
47,741,09644,299,816(c)(g)(h)(i)
17.35
%
Raymond Zimmerman
150,623(d)(j)
*15.91%
All directors and executive officers as a group
49,389,48245,395,181(c)-(j)(i)
17.95
%16.31%
*
Less than 1%
(a)
Unless otherwise indicated, each named person has voting and investment power over the listed shares and such voting and investment power is exercised solely by the named person or shared with a spouse. None of the listed shares have been pledged as security or otherwise deposited as collateral.
(b)
Reflects beneficial ownership of shares of Common Stock, and shares outstanding, as of February 2, 2019.January 30, 2021.
(c)
Includes the following number of shares issuable within 60 days of February 2, 2019,January 30, 2021, upon the exercise or vesting of outstanding stock awards: Mr. Bersani, 95,128;102,320; Mr. Burgdoerfer, 92,611; Mr. Coe, 68,378;141,920; Mr. McGuigan, 121,655;63,689; Mr. Meslow, 127,919; Ms. Milano, 24,959; Mr. Waters, 83,288;26,004; Mr. Wexner, 576,028;692,436; and all directors and executive officers as a group, 1,062,047.1,590,136.
(d)
Includes the following number of deferred stock units credited to directors’ accounts under the 2003 Stock Award and Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Associate Directors that could be convertible into Common Stock within 60 days after termination from the Board: Ms. Bellinger, 6,309; Dr. Gee, 17,292; Mr. Hersch, 88,726;24,248; Ms. James, 35,951;56,979; Mr. Morris, 10,485;20,077; Ms. Nash, 26,735; Mr. Schottenstein, 6,309;24,343; Ms. Sheehan, 11,839; Mr. Steinour, 4,165; Mr. Zimmerman, 108,712;6,614; and all directors as a group, 277,949.170,835. Mr. Morris has elected to receive pay-out of his deferred stock units over three years, and his total represents 1/3 of the units which he would be owed upon his termination from the Board. Mr. Steinour has elected to receive pay-out of his deferred stock units over five years, and his total represents 1/5 of the units which he would be owed upon his termination from the Board.
(e)
Includes the following number of deferred stock units credited to executives’ accounts under the Company’s Stock Option and Performance Incentive1993 Plan that could be convertible into Common Stock within 60 days after termination of employment with the Company: Mr. Bersani, 8,092; Mr. Waters, 27,376; and all executives as a group, 35,468.8,702.
(f)Includes 127,567 shares held by The Linden East Trust, for which Mr. Hersch is trustee and shares voting and investment power with Mr. Wexner and Mrs. Wexner; 8,483,845 shares held by The Linden West Trust, for which Mr. Hersch is trustee and shares voting and investment power with Mr. Wexner; and 4,853,400 shares held by the Magnolia 2017 Trust, for which Mr. Hersch is trustee and shares voting and investment power with Mr. Wexner and Mrs. Wexner.
(g)
Excludes 33,188,52529,006,241 shares beneficially owned by Mr. Wexner as to which Mrs. Wexner disclaims beneficial ownership. Includes 127,567 shares held by The Linden East Trust; 3,081,7412,081,741 shares held by The Wexner Family Charitable Fund; 191,515 shares held by The Beech Trust; and 4,853,400352,941 shares held by the Magnolia 2017The Linden East II Trust; 352,941 shares held by The Linden West II Trust; 343,166 shares held by Pine Trust; 343,166 shares held by Willow Trust; 343,166 shares held by Cedar Trust; and 343,166 shares held by Rose Trust. Mrs. Wexner shares voting and investment power with Mr. Wexner with respect to shares held by The Linden East Trust, The Wexner Family Charitable Fund, The Beech Trust, The Linden East II Trust, The Linden West II Trust, Pine Trust, Willow Trust, Cedar Trust and the Magnolia 2017Rose Trust, and shares voting and investment power with Mr.Dennis Hersch with respect to shares held by The Linden East Trust and the Magnolia 2017The Linden East II Trust. Includes 6,298,34810,814,206 shares directly owned by Mrs. Wexner.

51

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(h)(g)
Includes the following number of shares held in the Savings and Retirement Plan (as of February 2, 2019)January 30, 2021), over which Messrs. McGuigan and Wexner have investment but not voting power: Mr. McGuigan, 4,874;5,128; and Mr. Wexner, 1,890,961.1,945,002.
(i)(h)
Includes 127,567 shares held by The Linden East Trust; 8,483,8456,111,181 shares held by The Linden West Trust; 3,081,7412,081,741 shares held by The Wexner Family Charitable Fund; 191,515 shares held by The Beech Trust; and 4,853,400352,941 shares held by the Magnolia 2017The Linden East II Trust; 352,941 shares held by The Linden West II Trust; 343,166 shares held by Pine Trust; 343,166 shares held by Willow Trust; 343,166 shares held by Cedar Trust; and 343,166 shares held by Rose Trust. Mr. Wexner shares voting and investment power with Mrs. Wexner with respect to shares held by The Linden East Trust, The Wexner Family Charitable Fund, The Beech Trust, The Linden East II Trust, The Linden West II Trust, Pine Trust, Willow Trust, Cedar Trust and the Magnolia 2017Rose Trust, and shares voting and investment power with Mr.Dennis Hersch with respect to the shares held by The Linden East Trust and The Linden West Trust and the Magnolia 2017 Trust. Includes 4,892,608 shares held by the Wexner Personal Holdings Corporation, of which Mr. Wexner is the sole stockholder, director and officer. Includes 6,298,34810,814,206 shares directly owned by Mrs. Wexner, as to which Mr. Wexner may be deemed to share voting and investment power. Includes 17,345,08315,365,014 shares directly owned by Mr. Wexner.
(j)Includes 3,440 shares which are Mr. Zimmerman’s pro rata share of 10,321 shares owned by a corporation of which Mr. Zimmerman is president and a 33% stockholder.
(k)(i)
Includes 2,500 shares held by the Frances Schottenstein 2010 Irrevocable Trust, for which Mr. Schottenstein is co-trustee and shares voting and investment power; and 2,000 shares held by the Irving Schottenstein Marital Trust 2, for which Mr. Schottenstein is co-trustee and has sole voting and investment power. Mr. Schottenstein has a financial interest in 500 of the foregoing shares held by the Irving Schottenstein Marital Trust 2.

52

52


TABLE OF CONTENTS

DELINQUENT SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

REPORTS

The Company’s executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities, must file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of the Company’s equity securities with the Commission. Copies of those reports must also be furnished to the Company. Based solely on a review of the copies of reports furnished to the Company and written representations of the Company’s executive officers and directors that no other reports were required, we believe that during fiscal 20182020 our executive officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners complied with these filing requirements, other than Mr. BersaniMs. Sheehan who was late in filing one Form 4 reportingregarding one transaction.

53

53


TABLE OF CONTENTS

SHARE OWNERSHIP OF PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

The following table sets forth the names of all persons who, as of the dates indicated below, were known by the Company to be the beneficial owners (as defined in the rules of the Commission) of more than 5% of the shares of Common Stock.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
Amount
Beneficially
Owned
Percent
of
Class
Leslie H. Wexner(1)
 
47,741,096
 
 
17.35
%
Three Limited Parkway
 
 
 
 
 
 
P.O. Box 16000
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columbus, OH 43216
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Vanguard Group(2)
 
25,066,401
 
 
9.11
%
100 Vanguard Blvd.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Malvern, PA 19355
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BlackRock, Inc.(3)
 
21,445,945
 
 
7.80
%
55 East 52nd Street
 
 
 
 
 
 
New York, NY 10055
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PRIMECAP Management Company(4)
 
19,266,010
 
 
7.00
%
177 E. Colorado Blvd., 11th Floor
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pasadena, CA 91105
 
 
 
 
 
 
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
Amount
Beneficially
Owned
Percent
of Class
Leslie H. Wexner(1)
Three Limited Parkway
P.O. Box 16000
Columbus, OH 43230
44,299,816
15.91%
Lone Pine Capital LLC, David F. Craver, Brian F. Doherty, Mala Gaonkar,
Kelly A. Granat, Stephen F. Mandel, Jr. and Kerry A. Tyler(2)
Two Greenwich Plaza
Greenwich, CT 06830
26,265,094
9.4%
The Vanguard Group(3)
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
23,127,478
8.32%
Melvin Capital Management LP(4)
535 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
New York, NY 10022
20,913,640
7.5%
Egerton Capital (UK) LLP(5)
5 Stratton Street
London, W1J 8LA, United Kingdom
15,819,746
5.7%
Abigail S. Wexner(6)
Three Limited Parkway
P.O. Box 16000
Columbus, OH 43230
15,293,575
5.49%
(1)
(1)
As of February 2, 2019.January 30, 2021. For a description of Mr. Wexner’s beneficial ownership, see “Security Ownership of Directors and Management” on page 5152.
(2)
As of December 31, 2018,2020, based solely on information set forth in the Schedule 13G/A filed February 11, 201916, 2021 by Lone Pine Capital LLC, David F. Craver, Brian F. Doherty, Mala Gaonkar, Kelly A. Granat, Stephen F. Mandel, Jr. and Kerry A. Tyler (each, a “Lone Pine Reporting Person”), each Lone Pine Reporting Person has shared dispositive power over 26,265,094 shares and shared voting power over 26,265,094 shares.
(3)
As of December 31, 2020, based solely on information set forth in the Schedule 13G/A filed February 10, 2021 by The Vanguard Group, The Vanguard Group has sole dispositive power over 24,733,91822,292,258 shares and sole voting power over 272,0650 shares, and has shared dispositive power over 332,483835,220 shares and shared voting power over 68,918319,199 shares.
(3)(4)
As of December 31, 2018,2020, based solely on information set forth in the Schedule 13G/A filed February 6, 201916, 2021 by BlackRock, Inc., BlackRock, Inc.Melvin Capital Management LP, Melvin Capital Management LP has soleshared dispositive power over 21,445,94520,913,640 shares and soleshared voting power over 19,488,77320,913,640 shares.
(4)(5)
As of December 31, 2018,2020, based solely on information set forth in the Schedule 13G/A13G filed February 8, 201910, 2021 by PRIMECAP Management Company, PRIMECAP Management CompanyEgerton Capital (UK) LLP, Egerton Capital (UK) LLP has sole dispositive power over 19,266,01015,819,746 shares and sole voting power over 4,848,42415,819,746 shares.
(6)
As of January 30, 2021. For a description of Mrs. Wexner’s beneficial ownership, see “Security Ownership of Directors and Management” on page 52.

54

54


TABLE OF CONTENTS

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

As provided in our written charter, the Audit Committee is instrumental in the Board’s fulfillment of its oversight responsibilities relating to (i) the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, (ii) the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (iii) the qualifications, independence and performance of the Company’s independent auditors and (iv) the performance of the Company’s internal audit function.

It is not the duty of the Audit Committee to plan or conduct audits or to determine that the Company’s financial statements are complete and accurate and are in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. This is the responsibility of management and the independent auditors. Furthermore, while we are responsible for reviewing the Company’s policies and practices with respect to risk assessment and management, it is the responsibility of the CEO and senior management to determine the appropriate level of the Company’s exposure to risk.

We have reviewed and discussed L Brands’ audited financial statements as of and for the year ended February 2, 2019January 30, 2021 and met with both management and our independent auditors to discuss the financial statements. Management has represented to us that the financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. We have reviewed with the internal auditors and independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their respective audits. We also met with the internal auditors and independent auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations and their evaluations of the Company’s internal controls.

We have also discussed with the independent auditors allthe matters required to be discussed with audit committees underby the applicable auditingrequirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”) and regulatory standards.the Commission. The Company’s independent auditors also provided to us the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight BoardPCAOB regarding the independent auditor’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and we discussed with the independent auditors their independence from the Company. We considered whether the provision of non-audit services by the independent auditors to the Company is compatible with maintaining their independence.

Based on the reviews and discussions summarized in this Report, and subject to the limitations on our role and responsibilities, certain of which are referred to above and in the Audit Committee charter, we recommended to the Board that L Brands’ audited financial statements be included in our annual report on Form2020 10-K for the year ended February 2, 2019 for filing with the Commission.

We have appointed Ernst & Young LLP as L Brands’ independent registered public accountants.

Audit Committee

Stephen D. Steinour, Chair
Donna A. James Chair
David T. Kollat
Michael G. Morris
Robert H. Schottenstein
Allan R. Tessler
Raymond Zimmerman

Anne Sheehan

55

55


TABLE OF CONTENTS

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

During our 20182020 fiscal year, Ernst & Young LLP served as the Company’s independent registered public accountants and in that capacity rendered an opinion on our consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2019.January 30, 2021. The Audit Committee has selected Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accountants for the current fiscal year.

Audit Fees

The aggregate audit fees payable to Ernst & Young&Young LLP for the fiscal years ended 20182020 and 20172019 were approximately $5,611,000$6,790,000 and $5,048,000,$5,080,000, respectively. These amounts include fees for professional services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP in connection with the audit of our consolidated financial statements and reviews of our unaudited consolidated interim financial statements as well as fees for services that generally only the independent auditor can reasonably be expected to provide, including comfort letters and consultation regarding financial accounting and/or reporting standards. These amounts also include fees for services rendered in connection with the audit of our internal control over financial reporting, and fees for services rendered in connection with statutory audits of our international subsidiaries’ financial statements.

statements and fees for audit services in connection with the potential sale or spin-off of VS NewCo.

Audit Related Fees

The aggregate fees for assurance and related services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP that were reasonably related to the audit of our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended 20182020 and 20172019 were approximately $304,000$367,000 and $288,000,$319,000, respectively. The fees under this category are for assurance and related services that are traditionally performed by the independent auditor and include audits of employee benefit plans, agreed upon procedures and other attest engagements.

Tax Fees

The aggregate fees for tax services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for the fiscal years ended 20182020 and 20172019 were approximately $138,000$151,000 and $338,000,$199,000, respectively. Tax fees include tax compliance and advisory services.

All Other Fees

No fees for other services were paid to Ernst & Young LLP for the fiscal years ended 20182020 and 2017.

2019.

Pre-approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and non-audit services to be provided by Ernst & Young LLP in a given fiscal year.

56

56


TABLE OF CONTENTS

OTHER MATTERS

The Board knows of no other matters to be brought before the annual meeting. However, if other matters should come before the meeting, each of the persons named as a proxy intends to vote in accordance with his or her judgment on such matters.

STOCKHOLDER AND MANAGEMENT PROPOSALS FOR NEXT YEAR

Stockholder Proposals Pursuant to Rule 14a-8

Proposals submitted for inclusion in the proxy statement for the 20202022 annual meeting must be received by the Secretary of the Company at our principal executive offices on or before December 28, 2019.

10, 2021.

Stockholder Director Nominations for Inclusion in 20202022 Proxy Statement

Written notice of stockholder nominations of persons for election as a director at the 20202022 annual meeting that are to be included in our proxy statement for the 20202022 annual meeting pursuant to the proxy access provisions in Section 2.05 of our Bylaws must be received by the Secretary of the Company at our principal executive offices no earlier than November 28, 201910, 2021 and no later than December 28, 2019.10, 2021. The notice must contain the information required by our Bylaws.

Other Stockholder Proposals

If a stockholder intends to present a proposal or nominate a person for election as a director at the 20202022 annual meeting other than as described above, the stockholder must comply with the requirements set forth in Section 2.04 of our Bylaws. The Bylaws require, among other things, that the Secretary receive written notice of the intent to present a proposal or nomination no earlier than February 16, 202019, 2022 and no later than March 17, 2020.21, 2022. The notice must contain the information required by our Bylaws.

Management Proposals

At the 2020 annual meeting, the Board will submit a proposal to stockholders to amend our certificate of incorporation to declassify the Board. If such proposal is approved by our stockholders, all of our directors will stand for election annually for one-year terms beginning at the Company's 2021 annual meeting. The Board will also submit a proposal to stockholders to amend our certificate of incorporation to remove supermajority voting requirements.

SOLICITATION EXPENSES

We are soliciting this proxy on behalf of our Board and will bear the solicitation expenses. Our directors or employees may solicit proxies by telephone, facsimile, email and personal solicitation, in addition to the use of the mail. In addition, we have retained Innisfree M&A Incorporated at a fee estimated to be approximately $25,000, plus reimbursable expenses and customary charges, to assist in the solicitation of proxies. We will, upon request, reimburse banks, brokerage houses and other institutions, nominees, and fiduciaries for their expenses in forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners.

 
By Order of the Board of Directors,
 

 
Leslie H. Wexner/s/ Sarah E. Nash
Sarah E. Nash
Chairman
Chair of the Board

57

57

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ADMITTANCE SLIP

2019 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Date, Time and Place of Meeting:

Date:Thursday, May 16, 2019

Time:8:30 a.m., Eastern Time
Place:Three Limited Parkway
Columbus, Ohio 43230

Attending the Meeting:

Stockholders who plan to attend the meeting in person must bring this admittance slip and a photo identification to gain access. Because of necessary security precautions, bags, purses and briefcases may be subject to inspection. To speed the admissions process, stockholders are encouraged to bring only essential items. Cameras, camcorders or videotaping equipment are not allowed. Photographs or videos taken by the Company at the meeting may be used by the Company. By attending, you waive any claim or rights to these photographs.

For more information about attending the annual meeting, please visit the website at www.lb.com or contact Investor Relations at (614) 415-7585.


TABLE OF CONTENTS


L BRANDS, INC.ATTENTION: INVESTOR RELATIONSP.O. BOX 16000THREE LIMITED PARKWAYCOLUMBUS, OH 43230VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.comUse the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALSIf you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date.Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.VOTE BY MAILMark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.TO VOTE MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED The Board of Directors recommends you vote FORthe following: 3.Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation☐☐☐ 1.Election of Directors NomineesForAgainstAbstain 4.Stockholder proposal to remove supermajority voting requirements☐☐☐ 01Patricia S. Bellinger 02Sarah E. Nash 03Anne Sheehan 04Leslie H. Wexner ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ For address change/comments, mark here(see reverse for instructions) ☐ Please indicate if you plan to attend this meetingYesNo ☐☐ The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposals: NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. 2.Ratification of the appointment of independent registered public accountantsForAgainstAbstain ☐ ☐ ☐ Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]Date Signature [Joint Owners]Date

TABLE OF CONTENTS


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The COMBINED Annual Report & Proxy Statement is/are available at www.proxyvote.com. This Proxy is Solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders on May 16, 2019 8:30 AM The undersigned hereby appoints Leslie H. Wexner and Stuart B. Burgdoerfer, and each of them, proxies, with full power of substitution, to vote for the undersigned all shares of Common Stock of L Brands, Inc. which the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally present at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 16, 2019 at 8:30 a.m., Eastern Time, and at any adjournments thereof, upon the matters described in the accompanying Proxy Statement and upon any other business that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments thereof. SAID PROXIES ARE DIRECTED TO VOTE AS MARKED ON THE REVERSE SIDE AND IN THEIR DISCRETION UPON SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THIS MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENTS THEREOF. Address change/comments: (If you noted any Address Changes and/or Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.) (Continued and to be signed on reverse side)